Houston, Texas Attempts to Hide Red Light Camera Safety Data


The city of Houston, Texas sought to keep secret all detailed information about the performance of its red light camera program on the eve of an election that will decide their fate. Yesterday, Paul Kubosh, co-founder of Citizens Against Red Light Cameras, filed suit in Harris County District Court seeking a court order compelling the release of accident data at intersections equipped with automated ticketing machines. Voters head to the polls today to decide whether or not the city will be allowed to continue using the devices.
“The city of Houston is not in compliance with the Texas Public Information Act by reason of failing to release requested public information,” attorney Randall Kallinen wrote in his brief to the court. “The monthly Location Performance Summary Reports from Houston red light camera contractor American Traffic Solutions, Inc., from September 30, 2008, to September 30, 2010, are public records under the Texas Public Information Act and not subject to any exception to release.”
Kubosh had sent his request for these reports on October 5. Under state law, the city had until October 19 to either supply the information or petition the state attorney general for a ruling on why the material should be considered exempt. The city has done neither. The city’s contractor, on the other hand, has been busy undermining the citizen initiative. As of October 25, American Traffic Solutions had spent $1.5 million in legal expenses for its failed effort to block the referendum in addition to an advertising blitz designed to rescue the program.
“Suppression has been the modus operandi by the pro camera advocates during entirety of the campaign — from trying to deny the people the right vote to suppressing data that would expose the lie that is the red light camera,” the anti-camera group’s spokesman, Philip Owens, told TheNewspaper. “Sadly this is nothing new, but we are engaged in the fight and plan on finishing”
The documents are of particular interest because research in the nearby city of Baytown revealed that accidents increased 40 percent at red light camera locations. Baytown is also holding a citizen initiative to ban photo ticketing.
[Courtesy: Thenewspaper.com]
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- The Oracle I say let the clunkers stay on the roads.
- Jpolicke Twenty-three grand for a basket case? And it has '66 wheel covers and gas cap so who knows what else isn't original?
- Scott Can't be a real 1965 Stang as all of those are nothing but a pile of rust that MIGHT be car shaped by now.
- 56m65711446 So, the engineers/designers that brought us the Pinto are still working at Ford!
- Spookiness I dig it. The colors are already available on the CX-50. The terracotta is like a nice saddle brown. The non-turbo Carbon Edition has a bluish gray and a burgundy leather interior. A nice break from the typical relentless black and 50 shade of gray palette. Early CX-30's had some dark navy blue (armest, console, and parts of the door) but I guess that was just too weird and radical so they switched to all-black.I'd be fine with cloth in colors, leather is over-rated, but I'll never have an all-black interior in a car ever again.
Comments
Join the conversation
Someone reported you could appeal a camera ticket in their city by sending the appeal to a post office box in Mexico. Not mentioned was if you had to do it in Spanish. Some legislatures have limited the ticket fine to a parking ticket. To beat this, some cities calculated the fine of a Pete tractor-trailer rig blocking 8 handicap spaces and used that as the "parking ticket." Others have used a "normal" parking ticket then thrown a $366 "excise tax" on it to run it up to over $400.
Thanks all. That shameful Prop 3 is defeated. I'm extremely proud of my fellow Houstonians. http://www.click2houston.com/election-results/25568031/detail.html