Automotive Idiocy On The Rise In Germany

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Did you know that all drivers in Germany are potentially subject to an Idiotentest? Well, “Idiot Test” is the popular term; technically it’s called the Medizinisch-Psychologische Untersuchungen (Medical-Psychological Test) and it’s administered to some 100,000 Germans each year by the Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen (Federal Highway Research Institute). The point is, if a German driver does something colossally stupid, like run a red light, wreck while racing, or get caught driving drunk, the Bundesanstalt makes him or her take a test to determine that they are medically and psychologically capable of driving safely. If you fail, either get sent back to (mandatory) driving school, or you lose your license (and gain the sneaking suspicion that your high school counselor was right, and you really are an idiot). Anyway, while you’re pondering the pros and cons of this system compared to America’s lassez-idiot approach, consider this: the number of idiot tests administered to German drivers was up three percent last year, the first time in years that the number went up. Apparently you can’t keep automotive idiocy down.

The reasons for the increase, according to Auto Motor und Sport: more drivers wrecking while racing, running red lights, taking narcotics in traffic (yes, really), and “overtaking dangerously.” Still none of these automotive idiocies was able to top the international king of stupid moves behind the wheel, driving drunk, which triggered 54 percent of all idiot tests.

Intriguingly, the Idiot Test has come under criticism from several German auto clubs and others, who argue that the tests are insufficiently transparent and that failing the test can make it nearly impossible to regain one’s driver’s license. One lawyer tells AM und S that

The scandal of the Idiot Test is that it’s nearly impossible to defend against their decisions

Which actually makes good sense. Idiots are notoriously bad at defending themselves against anything. And really, if you’re living in a society that requires mandatory driver training, failing an Idiot Test doesn’t leave you with many scapegoats. Which was probably the point.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 6 comments
  • Kristjan Ambroz Kristjan Ambroz on Nov 12, 2010

    I also think it is common sense to do the tests, however I would do them prior to attaining a licence in the first place on top of applying them to serious offenders. Sure, a fair number would never qualify to drive but the advantages would be enormous. It is already required to pass a psychological fitness / suitability test in certain European countries before they let you train for a truck driving licence - do not want people who are unable to concentrate or too aggressive behind the wheel of a 40 tonner. Well to be honest I would not want them behind the wheel of any vehicle apart from perhaps a bicycle but it would be political suicide for anyone to suggest it. Obligatory retesting of ones driving skills every 5 years appears quite sensible to me, too - again something that will sadly never happen.

  • Brettc Brettc on Nov 12, 2010

    I wonder if that's A3 Golf/Jetta or B4 Passat? Can't tell if it's a diesel either since the tach isn't visible. My thought is that if you end up taking the idiot test in Germany, then you've probably been deemed an idiot. I was shocked at how easily I was able to get my license in Maine when I moved. Since my original license was from Ontario all I had to do was an eye test and I got the license. No written test or road test. Amazing. Of course Maine used to be one of the states where illegal immigrants could easily get a driver's license so I guess that's why it was so easy for me 10 years ago.

  • Brandon I would vote for my 23 Escape ST-Line with the 2.0L turbo and a normal 8 speed transmission instead of CVT. 250 HP, I average 28 MPG and get much higher on trips and get a nice 13" sync4 touchscreen. It leaves these 2 in my dust literally
  • JLGOLDEN When this and Hornet were revealed, I expected BOTH to quickly become best-sellers for their brands. They look great, and seem like interesting and fun alternatives in a crowded market. Alas, ambitious pricing is a bridge too far...
  • Zerofoo Modifications are funny things. I like the smoked side marker look - however having seen too many cars with butchered wire harnesses, I don't buy cars with ANY modifications. Pro-tip - put the car back to stock before you try and sell it.
  • JLGOLDEN I disagree with the author's comment on the current Murano's "annoying CVT". Murano's CVT does not fake shifts like some CVTs attempt, therefore does not cause shift shock or driveline harshness while fumbling between set ratios. Murano's CVT feels genuinely smooth and lets the (great-sounding V6) engine sing and zing along pleasantly.
  • JLGOLDEN Our family bought a 2012 Murano AWD new, and enjoyed it for 280K before we sold it last month. CVT began slipping at 230K but it was worth fixing a clean, well-cared for car. As soon as we sold the 2012, I grabbed a new 2024 Murano before the body style and powertrain changes for 2025, and (as rumored) goes to 4-cyl turbo. Sure, the current Murano feels old-school, with interior switchgear and finishes akin to a 2010 Infiniti. That's not a bad thing! Feels solid, V6 sounds awesome, and the whole platform has been around long enough that future parts & service wont be an issue.
Next