VW's Stillborn Big Wide Car: The AmiWagen

Paul Niedermeyer
by Paul Niedermeyer

VW’s current strategy to design larger cars specifically for the US market isn’t the first time around. In the early sixties, VW gave serious thought to a six-seater rear-engine sedan to take on the Americans on their own (big) terms. Obviously inspired by the 1960 Corvair, which made a huge impression in Europe, but taken even further: the EA 128 was a fair chunk bigger and wider than the Corvair, right into mid-size territory. And with bench seats to seat six big Amerikaner. Even a wagon version (Kountry Knecht?). But where to get the underpinnings and six-cylinder engine for the AmiWagen? Where else:

Porsche, of course; that well-spring of VW prototypes and engineering for decades. And how convenient: the timing in 1962 was handy for Porsche, since their own new six-cylinder 901 (911) was just in gestation. The result: a (US) mid-sized sedan version of the 911, from the suspension right up to the steering wheel. And of course the 911 engine, which looks almost lost in that big rear end (pic here). Large copyrighted exterior pics here and here.

Stretching 4.7 meters (185 inches), the EA128 was a half-foot longer than the Corvair, and from the looks of it, substantially wider. The front seat was clearly designed for three-across seating, with a 40/60 split bench. (excellent pic here).

The 911 engine was detuned to 90 hp, which was respectable for European standards of the time, but the 911’s torque curve would have been anything but familiar with the typical American driver. Never mind the cost to build it, which presumably was at least one of the EA 128’s downfall. The Corvair’s own downward trajectory probably didn’t help. And even if VW could rationalize its production, it would have still come out way more expensive than a Fairlane. But VW had it all wrong: this should have been sold as a Porsche, with a zippy new name, say…Panamera.

[ see related VW 411/412 CC here]

Paul Niedermeyer
Paul Niedermeyer

More by Paul Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 34 comments
  • Robert.Walter Robert.Walter on Sep 11, 2010

    I wonder why these cars never saw the light of day ... could it be that, despite size, they were too primative to compete with US cars of the same size? Or, possibly, given the very large panel sizes, VW would have had to invest in presses to handle the large tools, for a car that could only be needed by Americans, but with no certainty of being embraced by them?

    • Paul Niedermeyer Paul Niedermeyer on Sep 11, 2010

      Robert; VW built (or had Porsche build) dozens and dozens of prototypes during this era. As you know, it was different then than now: no computer design; more trial and error. Somebody in VW got the idea in his head to ponder a big wide sedan: call Porsche and have them cobble up a crude prototype, and see how it comes off.

      There's a picture somewhere of over forty VW prototypes rolled out on a parking lot for Spiegel to shoot, to prove to Germans that they really were working on Beetle successors. Now days, it's done totally different.

  • Robert.Walter Robert.Walter on Sep 11, 2010

    Also, what's up with the wipers on the sedan? They are of an opposing type rarely seen (good for pushing the water up over the roof, and a common system for RH and LH drive vehicles, but not so good for wiping the very center of the glass and in trying to minimize this, with the inevitable lash, likely good for the two wipers to bang into each other... Or could it be that they are broken (compare to the wagon pic, which makes more sense)...

  • Slavuta Motor Trend"Although the interior appears more upscale, sit in it a while and you notice the grainy plastics and conventional design. The doors sound tinny, the small strip of buttons in the center stack flexes, and the rear seats are on the firm side (but we dig the ability to recline). Most frustrating were the repeated Apple CarPlay glitches that seemed to slow down the apps running through it."
  • Brandon I would vote for my 23 Escape ST-Line with the 2.0L turbo and a normal 8 speed transmission instead of CVT. 250 HP, I average 28 MPG and get much higher on trips and get a nice 13" sync4 touchscreen. It leaves these 2 in my dust literally
  • JLGOLDEN When this and Hornet were revealed, I expected BOTH to quickly become best-sellers for their brands. They look great, and seem like interesting and fun alternatives in a crowded market. Alas, ambitious pricing is a bridge too far...
  • Zerofoo Modifications are funny things. I like the smoked side marker look - however having seen too many cars with butchered wire harnesses, I don't buy cars with ANY modifications. Pro-tip - put the car back to stock before you try and sell it.
  • JLGOLDEN I disagree with the author's comment on the current Murano's "annoying CVT". Murano's CVT does not fake shifts like some CVTs attempt, therefore does not cause shift shock or driveline harshness while fumbling between set ratios. Murano's CVT feels genuinely smooth and lets the (great-sounding V6) engine sing and zing along pleasantly.
Next