German Water Torture: Stringing Opel Along

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

If anybody would offer me Nick Reilly’s job, I would scream. I don’t have the nerves the assignment takes. Yesterday, Opel made headlines for losing 51.5 percent in May. In today’s mass publication BILD Zeitung, there is even worse news:

“The decision about government aid for the ailing car manufacturer Opel has been delayed until the coming week.”

A meeting of the steering committee that was planned for today could not take place due to “scheduling difficulties.” A new meeting will “expectedly” take place in the coming week. Another committee (there is no shortage of committees in Berlin, only commitment is in short supply) had similar scheduling problems end of May.

According to Der Spiegel, “indications are mounting that the committee will deny aid.” They have an expert opinion from PriceWaterhouseCoopers that says that “General Motors has free liquidity between $16b and $17b.”

Message to GM: “Help yourself, or god help you.”

Whatever the commitment lacking committees may decide: The last word has Germany’s Economics Minister Brüderle. He’s a declared skeptic.

The true and final decision will be made by Brüderle’s boss, German Chancellor Angela Merkel. If politically expedient, she’ll approve the money. If not, she’ll use it for something else. The twentysomethingthousand lost jobs faze nobody. Germany has 3,242,000 jobless, 165,000 less than in the previous month. The sky won’t fall if Opel closes. Given the incredibly shrinking German car market, a little bloodletting may even help the German patient. Especially if the blood is spilled by an American company that had snubbed the Chancellor. Who drives a Golf at home.

There is no easier way to help the German car industry than to turn off Opel’s air supply. Totally EU compliant. No state aid to nobodoy. No sleazy job guarantees.

That “If Mrs. Merkel declines help, we will pay for it ourselves. Maybe this will make your chancellor happy” could haunt Whitacre. I bet it haunts Reilly every night and day.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 5 comments
  • Mhadi Mhadi on Jun 04, 2010

    Well done. At least GM cannot bully the German and Swedish governments the way they did with the Canadian government, which is spineless and just looks towards the U.S. for guidance. No tax-payer subsidies to a bankrupt company. Germans will not stand for it.

  • Tricky Dicky Tricky Dicky on Jun 05, 2010

    So what's the most likely scenario then?: 1) Opel don't get the money and go out of business OR 2) Opel don't get the money from any EU governments and GM has to do their best to fund them out of the available liquidity, meaning that Opel won't be able to reduce it's cost base as quickly as they would like, or to develop the desired new products in the optimal timeframes and consequently, bleed a little more market share/ fail to deliver proft in the medium term Not sure....

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next