What's Wrong With This Picture: Six Of One, Half Dozen Of The Other Edition


Buick’s LaCrosse is dropping its little-loved 3.0 V6 base engine in favor GM’s direct-injected 2.4 liter four-banger, probably so it can use the magic term “3o MPG highway” in forthcoming marketing. The downsides? You mean, besides having to move over 4,000 lbs with a 182 hp, 172 lb-ft engine (compared to the 3.0’s 255 hp, 217 lb-ft)?
Comments
Join the conversation
th009 "The LaCrosse is almost 10 inches longer than the Sonata, and is aimed at the premium (or near-premium) segment. I really don’t think the two cars are direct competitors." 1) Oh, I didn't realize GM's packaging ability is that poor. 2) You are right in that they are not direct competitors. GM would lose face in a direct comparison and thus it chose to give the Buick a higher MSRP and dump them to fleets.
We also have to remember Buicks target market here. Older folks don;t care how quick their cars are. They care if the seats are cushy, the ride is pillow soft and the trunk holds a foursomes worth of golf clubs. The Rendezvous had a very problematic 5 speed btw.
Buick sales are a fraction of what they were just a decade ago (just like Government Motors market share, but I digress) so the only direction they can go is up. I suspect Government Motors sales of Buicks to go up a bit whether it be by doubling the model lineup and sending more to rental fleets.
Isn't the LaCrosse a more spacious, luxurious (American style) car than the Regal? I think that Buick's buyers will have no trouble making a distinction between the tight Euro-style Regal and the bloated cruiser LaCrosse. And I'm sure that the 4 cylinder has enough power for buyers of either one, but if they have any doubts, the LaCrosse has the option 3.6 "Cadillac" engine - which should be good for bragging rights.