Biller Secret Toyota Documents "Published Material"; Pissing Match Breaks Out In Congress

Paul Niedermeyer
by Paul Niedermeyer
biller secret toyota documents published material pissing match breaks out in

Instead of solving the truly pressing needs of the land, Republicans and Democrats are publicly squabbling over the relevance and veracity of the Biller “smoking gun” documents that claim to prove that Toyota hid safety problems. U.S. Rep. Edolphus Towns, D-N.Y., chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, sent a letter on Feb. 26 to Yoshimi Inaba, president and chief executive officer of Toyota Motor North America Inc., that said the documents provided “evidence that Toyota deliberately withheld relevant electronic records that it was legally required to produce” in lawsuits. Towns went on to say that the documents “shed some light on Toyota’s handling of the sudden unintended acceleration problem” and “indicate a systematic disregard for the law. Not so, says U.S. Rep. Darrell Issa, R-California. And he has a smoking gun of his own:

In a response dated March 2, Issa wrote that Towns’ conclusions were based on “conjecture and altered quotations” and that Towns’ letter “frequently misquotes and mischaracterizes” the documents. From a law.com article:

Issa cited Dallas plaintiffs attorney Todd Tracy, who reopened 17 personal injury cases based on Biller’s claims but voluntarily dismissed them after reviewing the documents. Tracy said that they failed to reveal any “concealment, destruction, or pattern of discovery abuse…In a telephone interview on Thursday, Tracy told The National Law Journal that Issa’s characterization was correct. One box contained 15 copies of the same deposition, Tracy said. Another contained research about bringing a wrongful termination suit. Tracey found 50 copies of Biller’s resume and e-mails that Biller wrote to colleagues, but no replies. “These were supposed to be the hottest documents in the history of jurisprudence, the way they were portrayed,” Tracy said. “The material was published material. Give me a break.”

In many years of litigating against Toyota, Tracy said, he never had any trouble securing discovery material. “I never had any trouble getting it at all,” Tracy said.

Towns had his comeback: “Mr. Issa’s comments do not address the central issue — has Toyota been illegally withholding documents for years. We need to continue cutting through the smokescreen put up by Toyota and keep our eyes on the ball.” Leave it to a congressman to use the word “smokescreen” with meaning.

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 14 comments
  • Mungooz Mungooz on Mar 06, 2010

    Why is it so difficult for the brain dead Republican commenters here and elsewhere to understand that the Toyota "mysterious" acceleration recalls are newsworthy because the alleged problem(s) are killing people? A recall mandated because a window doesn't roll down is not equally important. What is it with these conspiracy nuts? The UAW, in concert with Detroit's salvaged manufacturers, have conjured up this controversy? Get real. Geez! And that Issa guy, I wouldn't trust him as far as I could throw him.

  • Kendahl Kendahl on Mar 06, 2010

    "Pissing match" conjures up a different picture.

  • Lou_BC I kinda like the blocky lines. The snout has a star wars stormtrooper look so that means it won't hit anything.
  • ToolGuy I respect the work this individual has done from the starting point he was handed ("I have been involved for about 6 months repairing this car acquired form my sister who received it from our dad"; "The car was an oily mess when I received it, had a clogged catalytic converter, and hesitated intermittently on the highway after extended driving (> 20 miles)")...But there is no need to show prospective customers the "before" or "in process" photographs. Very few customers want to see or know how the sausage is made.And rather than show extreme close-ups of the dents, call a PDR shop, and bump up your selling price.
  • Ajla "launched as the GX550 offering a 3.4-liter" I know some people rip on pick up or performance car buyers for insecurity but it is funny that premium vehicle buyers need inflated designations like this because "GX340t" won't get their d*cks hard. Although Lexus isn't alone in this, it's even better here because they went from GX470 to GX460 back in 2009 and no one died over the decrease. The IS500 and LC500 are still matched to their displacement but maybe they'd sell more if it was called LC650? 🤔
  • ToolGuy Q: Is it time for ToolGuy the non-early adopter to purchase an EV for long-term ownership?A: No, it is not.(Get this stuff ironed out and I'll be back later.)
  • Theflyersfan Why take the effort to cover the back plate when the front plate is visible in a couple shots?
Next