Opel Rescue Delayed

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer
opel rescue delayed

GM was supposed to have a restructuring plan for Opel in place by the end of December, but it’s looking like that deadline is DOA. In a blog post at GM Europe’s “ Driving Conversations” blog, GME supremo Nick Reilly explains:

While it is indeed exciting to see that things are coming together, bear in mind this is going to be one of the largest, most complex industrial reorganisations in European manufacturing in years. It will affect thousands of people and their families; impact plants and other stakeholders.

We are determined to do this right. We must do this right. Although we had hoped to have the new business model finalised in December, it appears that more work needs to be done and further consultations will not be rushed.

I said earlier that we would have a plan in place by year-end. Now it looks like an announcement may slip into January. This is not a broken promise. It is a pledge to do something right.

More likely, the problem is cash-related. GM has thus far only offered to pay 20 percent of the cost of restructuring Opel, or about $1b of the estimated $5b price tag. The rest would come from European governments, who are not eager to see unemployment rise if Opel goes under. At least that’s the theory.

And though in some respects that seems to be a fairly safe bet (according to Sergio Marchionne, no OEM auto factory has been closed in Europe since before World War II), GM is incredibly unpopular in Europe. Speaking at a conference in Brussels, Justus Haucap, the chair of Germany’s Monopolkommission said that aid for Opel would distort competition, possibly putting automakers like VW at a disadvantage. This, despite the German government’s previous willingness to violate EU rules to fund the sale of Opel to Magna. According to Haucap, Opel’s problems started “long before the financial crisis” as the automaker’s sales have fallen by 100,000 units since 2005.

According to the WSJ, Haucap believes “It is also unclear why Opel should have no other source of funding given that it is 60% owned by the U.S. government,” and that “he is optimistic that the new German government will have a more competition-based approach to helping Opel.” In plain English: nobody wants to give GM money to keep Opel.

Join the conversation
2 of 13 comments
  • Rusted Source Rusted Source on Dec 10, 2009
    This is not a broken promise. It is a pledge to do something right. Ain't that a peach. I should use that line the next time my wife complains that our house renovations are still not done.

  • Tricky Dicky Tricky Dicky on Dec 11, 2009

    I think the Marchionne quote was referring to German car factories not closing. Plenty of plants closed in the UK for example, Renault shut up shop in Brussels about 10 years ago for a continental European example.

  • Scott "It may not be the ideal hauler to take the clan cross-country to Wally World considering range anxiety "Range Anxiety is a chosen term that conceals as much as it discloses. You don't care about range that much if you can recharge quickly and current BV's (battery vehicles) can't, no matter how good the chargers are. From what I've been reading it is likely that within 5 years there will be batteries in cars, most likely Tesla's, that can charge fast enough with no harm to the batteries to satisfy all of us with no need to increase range beyond a real world 300-ish miles.And that's when I buy one.
  • Charles I had one and loved it . Seated 7 people . Easy to park , great van
  • Jay Mason Your outdoor space will get better every year with a pergola. A horizontal, pole-supported framework for climbing plants is called a pergola. It creates a closed off area. pergola builder denton texas by Denton Custom Decks provide cover for outdoor gatherings. They would be more than happy to assist you with the pergola's framework.
  • Alan I would think Ford would beef up the drive line considering the torque increase, horse power isn't a factor here. I looked at a Harrop supercharger for my vehicle. Harrop offered two stages of performance. The first was a paltry 100hp to the wheels (12 000AUD)and the second was 250hp to the wheels ($20 000 (engine didn't rev harder so torque was significantly increased)). The Stage One had no drive line changes, but the Stage Two had drive line modifications. My vehicle weighs roughly the same as a full size pickup and the 400'ish hp I have is sufficient, I had little use for another 100 let alone 250hp. I couldn't see much difference in the actual supercharger setup other than a ratio change for the drive of the supercharger, so that extra $8 000 went into the drive line.
  • ToolGuy Question: F-150 FP700 ( Bronze or Black) supercharger kit is legal in 50 states, while the Mustang supercharger kit is banned in California -- why??