GM-Daewoo: Grasping At Straws?

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Bailout and reorganization gave GM the fresh start it so desperately needed in the US, but other governments have been decidedly less sympathetic to GM’s plight. Germany saw an opportunity to free Opel from GM’s grip, and now the Korean Development Bank has GM up against the wall over the future of GM-Daewoo. Reuters reports Fritz Henderson flew to Korea to meet with Daewoo’s creditors and put a cheery face on the situation. But calling the talks “very positive” is more tribute to Fritz’s unflagging optimism than an indication that GM-Daewoo is almost out of the woods. GM has no choice but to fight for its only remaining small car development center, the only question is with what?

GM-Daewoo is so far in debt to the KDB that it has no choice but make a public equity offering, a move that Henderson says he supports. But the issue that the KDB wants resolved is how much GM will contribute to such an offering. Without a sweetened pot, it’s hard to imagine investors going to go head-over-heels for a deeper stake in an indebted, sales-losing, shackled-to-GM carmaker. On the point of this contribution however, Fritz was… incoherent.

GM has resources around the world. Resources can be used not only from the U.S., including operations here in Korea. We are able to provide support, if necessary

The problem is that this is only moderately true at best. Daewoo’s offering will be $425m at minimum; the KDB wants that amount doubled. But GM is forbidden from using any of its $50b US bailout money to rescue its foreign division, and where else is The General going to find the cash to hold off its Korean creditors? Fritz’s statement has the vague confidence of someone deciding which leg to cut off to stay alive.

And even if GM does come up with enough money to pull off an equity offering, it has no way of stopping KDB-initiated reforms in Daewoo management. The bank has said it wants a more prominent role in managing the firm, including hiring its own financial officer. The KDB also wants GM to share licenses for jointly-developed vehicles. And even if GM comes up with some money for the share offering, the KDB is likely to expand its share beyond its current 28 percent. In other words, the bank is going to get its way. Daewoo is slip-sliding away, and all of GM’s small car eggs are still in that basket.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 16 comments
  • Monty Monty on Oct 15, 2009

    Great writing, Mr. Niedermeyer. I had to double-check the byline to verify the author of this post. You're just as snarky as Mr. Farago; for illustration look no futher than these two gems: "On the point of this contribution however, Fritz was… incoherent." "Fritz’s statement has the vague confidence of someone deciding which leg to cut off to stay alive."

  • Pacificpom2 Pacificpom2 on Oct 15, 2009

    With Holden building the Cruze next year, perhaps this will be the "world car platform" that Zeta/J-car failed to be. GM won't need a manufacturer in Korea anymore, just a design house hooked into the web.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next