Texas Police Chief: "Fired for Questioning Red Light Cameras"

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper

Questioning the wisdom of photo enforcement can be fatal to the career of a top law enforcement official. Former Texas police Chief Michael Clancey found this out the hard way when he dared to suggest that the College Station City Council should not use red light cameras as a budgetary tool. Clancey filed a lawsuit in federal court last month demanding punitive damages and back wages from the city which, he claimed, violated his First Amendment rights.

From Clancey’s lawsuit:

When the city first considered implementing red light cameras, the program was justified as a revenue-generating program, and was listed for public discussion and comment on the city council docket. Clancey voiced his opposition to the description of the program, explaining that he believed the red light project should be based upon concerns for public safety. This matter was not raised by Clancey in his official capacity. Rather, Clancey expressed his opinion as a citizen of College Station.

According to the suit, City Manager Glenn Brown and Assistant City Manager Kathy Merrill retaliated by giving Clancey a sharply negative performance review.

Mr Brown and Ms Merrill failed to provide any details for how Clancey could improve his performance. Rather, Clancey was simply told to improve his performance by November 1, or he would be subject to termination, and provided no direction that would allow him to meet management’s expectations.

Clancey claimed that he never had a chance to defend himself to city officials before he was given the choice of resigning or being fired on October 26, 2007. Clancey chose to cite “family reasons” and resign.

Clancey’s dilemma sheds light on the difference in opinion regarding photo ticketing in the law enforcement community. Top brass, represented by the International Association of Chiefs of Police, not only endorse the use of red light cameras and speed cameras, the organization makes money from “certification” of the devices.

On the other hand, officers in the field tend to oppose automated ticketing machines. The Phoenix Law Enforcement Association, for example, represents over 2600 police officers in Phoenix, Arizona. The group recently testified against the state’s photo radar program.

Clancey started his law enforcement career thirty years ago in Alexandria, Virginia, where he rose from beat cop to captain before taking the job of chief in Westerville, Ohio, in 1999. Clancey took the higher-profile College Station job in 2005. The crime rate dropped sixteen percent during his tenure.

For its part, College Station officials released an internal affairs report attacking Clancey for his involvement in the cancellation of a “failure to obey a police officer” ticket issued by a rookie officer on October 9, 2007 to the daughter of a police lieutenant. The report was finalized after Clancey was forced to quit.

The Newspaper
The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Join the conversation
2 of 12 comments
  • TonyJZX TonyJZX on Jun 19, 2009

    the way i look at it is that Hitler fired a lot of his lieutenants who didn't tow the party line (and worse) i'm sure the US Army had to sift thru a lot of people before they found the 'right' kind of person to run Gitmo and Abu Ghraib texas and other local council 'organs' (!!!) are really no different

  • Ravenchris Ravenchris on Jun 20, 2009

    You want justice? Do not reelect incumbents.

  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X The push for EV's is part of the increase in our premiums. Any damage near the battery pack and the car is a total loss.
  • Geozinger Up until recently this was on my short list of cars to replace my old car. However, it didn't pass the "knee test" with my wife as her bad knee makes it difficult for her to get in and out of a sedan. I saw a number of videos about the car and it seems like the real deal as a sporting sedan. In addition I like the low price, too, but it was bad luck/timing that we didn't get to pull the trigger on this one.
  • ToolGuy I agree with everyone here. Of course there are exceptions to what I just said, don't take everything so literally. The important thing is that I weighed in with my opinion, which is helping to move things forward. I believe we can all agree that I make an important contribution (some will differ, that is their prerogative). A stitch in time saves nine. Life isn't fair, you know. I have more to say but will continue at our next meeting. You can count on that, for I am a man of my word. We will make it happen. There might be challenges. I mean, it is what it is. This too shall pass. All we can do is all we can do. These meetings are never really long enough for me to completely express all the greatness within me, are they? Let's meet to discuss. All in a day's work. After all, Rome wasn't built in a day. At the end of the day, I must say I agree with you. I think you will agree. When all is said and done, there is more said than done. But of course that is just one man's opinion. You are free to disagree. As I like to say...(I am working on my middle management skills -- how am I doing?)
  • Golden2husky Have to say he did an excellent job on the C7, especially considering the limited budget he was given. I am very happy with my purchase.
  • Marty The problem isn't range; it's lack of electricity in multi-unit building parking. All you need is level 1 - a standard 120v wall socket - and if you're plugged in 10 hours overnight you get 280 miles per week or more. That's enough for most folks but you can use public charging to supplement when needed. Installing conduit circuits and outlets is simple and cheap; no charge stations needed.