BMW 316d: Worth a Longing Glance?
It’s BMW’s most efficient 3 series yet, which means it’s a brand-killer stateside Not to worry though, the new M5 will have 600hp. We’ll get that. Anyway, the two liter BMW oil burner gets 62.8mpg (52 miles per US gallon, non-EPA testing) and emits fewer than 120 grams of carbon per kilometer. Too bad it still starts at about $38K (in the UK). And takes 10.9 seconds to reach 62 mph. And since we’re in the realm of Euro-diesel fantasy, wouldn’t you just as soon cough up $40-42K for a 123d five-door? It may only get 50 mpg (41 US, etc), but it’s the first diesel to produce 100 hp per liter, and “a gem of an engine,” according to Autocar. Back in the stark reality of the American market though, that new M5 is going to have a twin-turbo V10. And in case that’s not enough, it will also boast a boost button based on the F1 KERS system. Good times.
More by Edward Niedermeyer
Comments
Join the conversation
The "gem of an engine" Autocar is referring to is the twin turbo version of this engine. Just like a 325d, a 330d and 335d have the same engine (with the 325 being the lowest stressed), this 316 has the same engine block as the 123d. But in terms of character they can't be further apart. You cannot quote this low stressed 316 in the same sentence as that in a 123d, just as you will never ever compare a 325d with a 335d. So in future please compare apples with apples before you throw powerful quotes like that around.
Alright guys (DarkSpork), let me tell you the truth about the Prius. Yes, in city driving you will average a fantastic 50mpg, but on highway driving, let me tell you, you'll get a horrible 50mpg. So where does this leave you at the end of the day? Regardless of what kind of driving you do, you'll usually end up with a 50mpg tank. There really isn't any conventional engine car you can buy today that will get you 50mpg on the freeway. Sure there's the Honda Fit and Toyota Yaris, but you've got to drive them fancy to get 50mpg out of them. Though I'll admit they probably are cheaper in the long run compares to a Prius. And if your daily commute is "mostly highway", that still means there's city driving and probably stop and go driving mixed in. So most people will get something between the combined and highway rating for their cars then. You can't really trust everyones numbers either. I caught a fish that was 12 inches big is what billy bob says, but actually it was barely 6 inches. We all know people lie about things to make themselves sound better. The truth is that most people either average the EPA combined rating, or up to 10% better. Driving slower and anticipating stops is required to do better than that.