Bailout Watch 475: Supplier Rescue Becomes OEM Bully Stick

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer
bailout watch 475 supplier rescue becomes oem bully stick

Ronald Reagan once said that the scariest words in the English language are “we’re from the government and we’re here to help.” For troubled auto suppliers though, there are scarier things than government assistance. Specifically, government assistance administered by GM and Chrysler. Automotive News [sub] reports that the the newest automaking branches of the federal government will be in charge of allocating the $5 billion in supplier aid, and that they’ll be using the money to settle old scores. According to AN‘s breezy prose, GM and Chrysler may “pass over” suppliers that have sought to protect themselves from OEM bankruptcies by demanding payment in fewer than 45 days or arguing that insolvency worries allow them to break contracts with the automakers. After all, the government didn’t think the supplier rescue money would go to the most in-need firms, did it?

In order to qualify for the program’s credit or loan guarantees, all suppliers must meet “qualifying commercial terms” with GM and Chrysler. And the gruesome twosome insist that contracts which were renegotiated to keep suppliers afloat do not qualify on these terms. In other words, if a supplier was struggling enough to renegotiate with an OEM they almost certainly won’t receive any government assistance. Analysts note that “hundreds” of suppliers have asked GM and Chrysler for renegotiation, and that they will either return to the original contracts (which brought them to these dismal circumstances) or simply do without the loans. With a government aid to suppliers now twisted into a tool of coercion for the OEMs, is it at all surprising that this plan is said to have originated with GM VP Bo Andersson?

Join the conversation
2 of 7 comments
  • ConspicuousLurker ConspicuousLurker on Mar 30, 2009

    Does anyone actually believe that all this tap-dancing and money infusion is going to save these companies? I'm not wild on the government playing favorites with our cash (Chrysler using the bailout cash to lay down money on the hood of their cars while Ford struggles, etc), but how are many of these suppliers going to survive in this market, anyways? Being an optimist and working under the assumption that Chrysler and GM won't go bankrupt, who are going to buy the cars that are filled with the supplied parts? Production is already cut back severely. I don't think the import factories can make up the difference--they're working in the same market. This whole exercise is an expensive effort to make it look like the politicians are doing something when they aren't. Bush needed to show that he did give two craps about domestic policy, and the Democrats and Obama want to prove to the rank-and-file UAW members, who have shoveled them cash for the last seven decades, that they did try.

  • Bertel Schmitt Bertel Schmitt on Mar 31, 2009

    Appropriate warnings to Chinese manufacturers have been issued:

  • Dwford Are these wild prices a function of financial necessity, or does the tech and the luxury actually justify the price? I can't imagine this minivan looking thing costing over $300k
  • Lorenzo Back in olden times, I stopped reading the Superman comics for the stories. It was worth the dime to just read the letters to the editor, with all the letter writers trying to trip up the comics writers with discrepancies, mostly caused by the 4-color printing process, and others arguing the physics of of sn imaginary cartoon character who wore his underwear over his tights. I now find the same thing is hppening here. I'm beginning to shift my interest in TTAC from the articles to the comments section!
  • SCE to AUX Faraday Future shouldn't even be here, and they won't make it. Other ultra-expensive EVs are fun projects for companies who can fund them from other revenue.The Lucid Air is a strange one because it starts at $87k but can run to over $250k. Most cars jump only around 50% for top trims, not 300%.As for EVs - don't give me more power (easy); give me more range (hard). And quicker filling time.
  • Dukeisduke It's funny how stuff like this crosses over between sites nowadays - there's an article about it today on MacRumors: Polestar 2 Software Update Brings Wave of New Apple CarPlay Features - MacRumors
  • Fahrvergnugen "If you’re itching for an ultra-exclusive EV – and who isn’t – "Me...