GM Set to Increase Q2 Production by 45%

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

GM intends on increasing vehicle production in the second financial quarter, from 380k to 550k. I know: it’s a major WTF moment. There is no evidence whatsoever that the U.S. new car market is headed for recovery. If anything, the opposite is true, what with home foreclosures and unemployment rising like steam from a New York City manhole. Not to mention the headline of The Detroit News story wherein this information resides: “GM Dealers Balk at Ordering New Vehicles.” The article reports that GM’s orphaned HUMMER, Saturn and Saab dealers aren’t ordering any more vehicles (duh), and current inventory levels at the other stores are, to use the old Bentley power output description, “adequate.” No wonder GM spokesman Chris Lee said “that [production] number could be adjusted.” Still, you’d kind of hope GM PR could do better than that, what with more than a decade of spinning bad news into gold (for the executives anyway). And so they do . . .

“Vehicles that are being requested by dealers or customers are the ones where production would be increased,” GM spokeswoman Susan Garontakos said. “If you’ve got a lot of Saturn vehicles, you can bet we’re not producing those vehicles. There is not a ramping up of production of vehicles that we’re not selling. It wouldn’t make sense.”

So what GM products are selling in sufficient quantities to justify a 45% production increase? Well, none really. Watching the DetN struggle to make the case for their hometown hero’s production plans is plenty painful.

Chevrolet Malibu retail sales were up 33 percent compared with a year earlier. At the end of February, GM had a 90-day supply of Malibus, down from 143 in January, but up from 39 days a year ago, according to Ward’s Automotive Reports. A two-month supply is considered a healthy inventory level, Bragman said.

One bright spot last month was GM’s crossovers. The Detroit automaker sold 6,400 of its new Chevrolet Traverse, a 23 percent increase from January, and Chevrolet’s sales of its crossovers—HHR, Equinox and Traverse—were up 7 percent from last year.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 21 comments
  • Ferrygeist Ferrygeist on Mar 13, 2009

    FWIW, regarding the Volt: a local NPR affiliate in Pasadena has sponsorship 'ads' appearing on a show brought to us by the "2011 Chevrolet Volt," followed by a bunch of pablum about saving the universe one carbon atom at a time or something. I don't know what to make of this. Anyone?

  • Eric Bryant Eric Bryant on Mar 13, 2009

    20% market share in a 9M/year market still means 150,000 vehicles need to be built each month. GM (and most others) overbuilt in 4Q2008. That resulted in the inventory numbers that we're seeing trotted around in this thread. The reaction in 1Q2009 was to built even fewer cars than were being sold. Now, there's still some inventory out there - but it's not like every single model has surplus on dealer's lots. At some point, factories have to run - even the currently-depressed market doesn't allow everyone to walk away from the task of building cars for the next 12-18 months. 550K in 2Q2009 does seem a bit high, but not completely unimaginable depending on the production mix.

  • Alan My view is there are good vehicles from most manufacturers that are worth looking at second hand.I can tell you I don't recommend anything from the Chrysler/Jeep/Fiat/etc gene pool. Toyotas are overly expensive second hand for what they offer, but they seem to be reliable enough.I have a friend who swears by secondhand Subarus and so far he seems to not have had too many issue.As Lou stated many utes, pickups and real SUVs (4x4) seem quite good.
  • 28-Cars-Later So is there some kind of undiagnosed disease where every rando thinks their POS is actually valuable?83K miles Ok.new valve cover gasket.Eh, it happens with age. spark plugsOkay, we probably had to be kewl and put in aftermarket iridium plugs, because EVO.new catalytic converterUh, yeah that's bad at 80Kish. Auto tranny failing. From the ad: the SST fails in one of the following ways:Clutch slip has turned into; multiple codes being thrown, shifting a gear or 2 in manual mode (2-3 or 2-4), and limp mode.Codes include: P2733 P2809 P183D P1871Ok that's really bad. So between this and the cat it suggests to me someone jacked up the car real good hooning it, because EVO, and since its not a Toyota it doesn't respond well to hard abuse over time.$20,000, what? Pesos? Zimbabwe Dollars?Try $2,000 USD pal. You're fracked dude, park it in da hood and leave the keys in it.BONUS: Comment in the ad: GLWS but I highly doubt you get any action on this car what so ever at that price with the SST on its way out. That trans can be $10k + to repair.
  • 28-Cars-Later Actually Honda seems to have a brilliant mid to long term strategy which I can sum up in one word: tariffs.-BEV sales wane in the US, however they will sell in Europe (and sales will probably increase in Canada depending on how their government proceeds). -The EU Politburo and Canada concluded a trade treaty in 2017, and as of 2024 99% of all tariffs have been eliminated.-Trump in 2018 threatened a 25% tariff on European imported cars in the US and such rhetoric would likely come again should there be an actual election. -By building in Canada, product can still be sold in the US tariff free though USMCA/NAFTA II but it should allow Honda tariff free access to European markets.-However if the product were built in Marysville it could end up subject to tit-for-tat tariff depending on which junta is running the US in 2025. -Profitability on BEV has already been a variable to put it mildly, but to take on a 25% tariff to all of your product effectively shuts you out of that market.
  • Lou_BC Actuality a very reasonable question.
  • Lou_BC Peak rocket esthetic in those taillights (last photo)
Next