Chevy to Grab Market Share By the Bull

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

Farley was first. Last week, Ford’s marketing maven threw down for The Blue Oval Boyz, declaring Crazy Henry’s mob’s would grab a bigger slice of the new car pie. Now Ed Peper’s prognosticating a more prodigious piece of America’s deflated new car market. Chevy’s brand Veep stepped up to the microphone at the Automotive News World Congress (our invitation got trapped by the spam filter) and told the world– well, Detroit– that the bow tie brand is ascendant. “We gained six-tenths of a point of (retail) market share last year,” Eddy declared. “This was the second-highest year-over-year share gain among all car brands, behind only Honda.” Hang on; what’s this then? “Chevrolet’s 2008 total market share was 13.5 percent, down from 13.9 percent in 2007, according to the Automotive News Data Center. Toyota Division overtook Chevrolet as the top-selling brand in 2008, rising to 13.9 percent from 13.4 percent in 2007.” Hmmm. Anyway, you’ll never guess how Chevy will steal sales from its rivals. Government checks for buyers? Well, not directly. (Just kidding. Sort of.) Nope. Marketing!

“‘Chevrolet will target its fuel solutions message at younger, environmentally conscious buyers using a lot of digital marketing and at ‘opinion influencers,’ Peper said. To reach the latter group, the brand will use TV spots.”

Whoa! TV spots. Rad! But don’t get to thinking that Peper doesn’t know what’s hip, hot and happening.

“Today, a new administration takes charge in the nation’s capital,” Peper said, his voice heavy with historical import (presumably). “We are optimistic that President Obama understands what this industry means to the country, but we can’t just be optimistic. We have to act. We have to set the record straight!”

And there I was, thinking he was going to say something about building better cars. Never mind. Speaking of history (shout out to Menno), clearly Ed doesn’t “get” irony. This is Mr. P’s description of the scene in Washington, when Moe, Larry and Shemp (sorry, but I’ve meaning to do that for months) appeared before the U.S. Congress to appeal for bailout billions.

“It was like watching a time warp,” Peper said. “General Motors, Ford and Chrysler being treated like they were Nash, Studebaker and DeSoto.”

Hey, he said it.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 10 comments
  • Ponchoman49 Ponchoman49 on Jan 21, 2009

    The 2006-2009 Impalas are decent mid size car values. I have driven numerous examples with base 3500's to SS models with the 5.3 liter V8 and all have been very solid with no squeaks and rattles, well put together interiors and no issues to report. And the lower end 3500 versions can see well over 30 MPG in highway driving all day long with there old fashioned 4 speed automatics and pushrod V6 engines. To put this into perspective, a neighbor owns a 2007 Camry Hybrid 4 cylinder and she averages about 32 MPG on the open road. Her car was nearly 30K on the sticker, uses a complex hybrid powertrain that reduces the trunk to less than 11 cu. ft. vs the Impalas 18.6 cu. ft. and her car has a 4 cylinder engine that stutters and stammers to life on the daily drive cycle. A typical LS or LT Impala brand new sells for 20K or less! I know which of the two cars I would buy if given a choice for a daily driver over the long haul!

  • Mud Mud on Jan 21, 2009

    Hey if I buy that Chevy, then I'm a Peper! He's a Peper! You can be a Peper too!

  • Dave Holzman My '08 Civic (stick, 159k on the clock) is my favorite car that I've ever owned. If I had to choose between the current Civic and Corolla, I'd test drive 'em (with stick), and see how they felt. But I'd be approaching this choice partial to the Civic. I would not want any sort of automatic transmission, or the turbo engine.
  • Merc190 I would say Civic Si all the way if it still revved to 8300 rpm with no turbo. But nowadays I would pick the Corolla because I think they have a more clear idea on their respective models identity and mission. I also believe Toyota has a higher standard for quality.
  • Dave Holzman I think we're mixing up a few things here. I won't swear to it, but I'd be damned surprised if they were putting fire retardant in the seats of any cars from the '50s, or even the '60s. I can't quite conjure up the new car smell of the '57 Chevy my parents bought on October 17th of that year... but I could do so--vividly--until the last five years or so. I loved that scent, and when I smelled it, I could see the snow on Hollis Street in Cambridge Mass, as one or the other parent got ready to drive me to nursery school, and I could remember staring up at the sky on Christmas Eve, 1957, wondering if I might see Santa Claus flying overhead in his sleigh. No, I don't think the fire retardant on the foam in the seats of 21st (and maybe late 20th) century cars has anything to do with new car smell. (That doesn't mean new car small lacked toxicity--it probably had some.)
  • ToolGuy Is this a website or a podcast with homework? You want me to answer the QOTD before I listen to the podcast? Last time I worked on one of our vehicles (2010 RAV4 2.5L L4) was this past week -- replaced the right front passenger window regulator (only problem turned out to be two loose screws, but went ahead and installed the new part), replaced a bulb in the dash, finally ordered new upper dash finishers (non-OEM) because I cracked one of them ~2 years ago.Looked at the mileage (157K) and scratched my head and proactively ordered plugs, coils, PCV valve, air filter and a spare oil filter, plus a new oil filter housing (for the weirdo cartridge-type filter). Those might go in tomorrow. Is this interesting to you? It ain't that interesting to me. 😉The more intriguing part to me, is I have noticed some 'blowby' (but is it) when the oil filler cap is removed which I don't think was there before. But of course I'm old and forgetful. Is it worth doing a compression test? Leakdown test? Perhaps if a guy were already replacing the plugs...
  • Crown No surprise there. The toxic chemical stew of outgassing.
Next