"I Drive A Foreign Car. Should I Feel Guilty?"

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

So opens a guest commentary by Ira Lacher in today’s Des Moines Register. And if you believe the Detroit line, you might assume this voice from the middle American heartland would answer in the affirmative. You’d be wrong. Lacher describes his impression of American cars as being “designed and put together by committee – a bunch of parts cobbled together. The steering wheel felt as if it were just sticking out of the dashboard. The gas and brake pedals seemed mere appendages to the floor. The seats were uncomfortable frames covered with cheap cloth. This wasn’t a car; it was a homemade personal computer! By contrast, every rented Honda, Toyota, Mazda and Nissan seemed like a machine that functioned like one machine.” But when he recently purchased a Hyundai, Lacher clearly felt at least a few pangs of guilt.

“If the Big Three were in this much trouble a year and a half ago as I was car shopping, would it have mattered?” wonders Lacher. “Maybe. I might have taken Hyundai’s best offer to my fast-talking, quintessentially arrogant American-brand dealership and said, “Match this and you’ve got a sale. But based on my shopping experiences with them, I think I know what they would have said. I think they still felt that American consumers owed them something because after all, they were the American auto industry, the folks who remade the country, who beat the Nazis. They would have said, ‘No.’ And maybe that’s why even though the Big Three’s fall into Chapter 11 – and perhaps their demise – would psychologically and empirically hammer America, I wouldn’t feel responsible. It is not unpatriotic to want the greatest return for the money you work so hard to earn.”

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 124 comments
  • Driver23 Driver23 on Jan 01, 2009
    Are you saying the big 3 put a hypnotic trance on the public to induce them to buy suv’s? Amazing. Indeed. That trance is called advertisement. In case you are not aware, purpose of advertisement is to induce desire to buy stuff - doesn't matter if you really need it or not. That's why advertisement of alcohol and tobacco products is heavily regulated. Have a look here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advertisement It is pretty easy to feed on someone sense of insecurity - there are a lot of products that specifically target this audience. Some companies at least have a bit or moral values not to go there. I am sure Google could make a lot of money on searching free p**n efficiently. But they don't - they have 'do no evil' stance. Detroit wanted every dollar they could make - no matter how. Who do you think lobbied to classify SUVs as trucks so they would not be taxed appropriately to their actual use - as passenger cars? Your astute observation is appreciated. Especially how Volvo made interesting cars… Yes, because I owned a few. Not anymore. They used to be frugal and had R models and came with a stick. Check it out: '97 850R is was 19/26 mpg. That was 10 years ago. Go compare specs on MSN Autos - they keep specs of old cars. '97 850 wagon has MORE leg room in the rear seat, same shoulder space and has better fuel economy. They were also very reliable.
  • U mad scientist U mad scientist on Jan 01, 2009
    Detroit quality is just perfect, consumers are stupid, buying cars from people with black hair and accented English is anti-American, yadda, yadda, yadda. Pch101, that’s a strawman argument with the added frisson of an accusation of racism. Hey, as long as we're on the subject, what about nationalism (you know, national socialism? lol) and xenophobia? -- This whole farce is so transparent: 1. Some large multinations runs factories in the midwest, and builds cars that lose money. 2. Some other large multinations run factories in the south, and builds cars that make money. But we have to support (1), because they're our large faceless corps, and they care about us, or something. Really? I will also note that pretty much none of the vitriol is directed at european manufacturers. Racism much?
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
Next