Review: Saab 9-3 Turbo X
Volvo did it. Acura still does it. Audi has been doing it for a long time. And now Saab is giving it a shot: start with a front-wheel-drive platform, add a powerful engine and an all-wheel-drive system (hopefully with a few tricks up its sleeve), and then try to pass the nose-heavy result off as a viable alternative to a balanced rear-wheel-drive BMW. To wit: the limited edition 2008 Saab 9-3 Turbo X, in sedan or wagon SportCombi form. Success? Not so much.
Imagine a Saab 9-3 with a coat of black metallic paint, prominent stylized dual exhaust tips and 18” alloys that recall the tri-spoke rims that distinguished the brand’s iconic 900 SPG. That’s the Turbo X. The 9-3 has never been distinctive enough to be interesting or beautiful enough to be, well, beautiful. At best, these tweaks render it mildly sinister.
The Turbo X cabin is much the same as the regular 9-3 Aero, with solid black instead of two-tone leather and faux carbon fiber trim. The interior looks and feels like that of a $30k car, at best; the Turbo X’s price is 50 percent north of that mark. Interior low points: the hard plastic door pulls crunch when you grab them and various plastic-on-plastic itches when traversing pocked pavement. Interior high point: the soft leather upholstery.
The Turbo X’s front seats may not be Sweden’s best, but they provide a decent amount of lateral support. In back, you’ll find barely enough room for adults. Cargo volume is about average; the tailgate latch was fussy on the car tested.
The mechanicals: a 280-horsepower turbocharged 2.8-liter DOHC V6 driving four wheels through a six-speed manual (paddle-shifted six-speed auto optional) and the latest Haldex all-wheel-drive system (which doesn’t wait for the front wheels to slip before engaging the rears). The Turbo X adds an electronic limited-slip rear that distributes torque left-to-right to counteract understeer in turns.
Boost lag isn’t bad. From 3,000 to 5,000 rpm, the turbo six’s smooth, effortless grunt would do a V8 proud. Rev the engine before releasing the clutch, and the car launches strongly and— thanks to the all-wheel-drive system— without wheelspin. While the Turbo X is not blindingly quick, you’re soon up to cruising speed. Even at full throttle, the DOHC mechanicals barely manage to be heard over the prominently throaty exhaust. While cruising, the soundtrack is all exhaust, whether you want it or not. After a few hours on the road, not.
The Turbo X’s shifter is awful. The throws are long, the action dreadfully imprecise. There’s easily enough room between first and second for another ratio. Unless you rev the engine nearly to the redline, the powerplant drops out of its powerband. And even if you do rev to red, the powertrain bogs as you engage second. Meanwhile, fourth, fifth, and sixth are so close together that one of them is redundant. And yet the stick is still preferable to the Aisin autobox.
The suspension absorbs bumps reasonably well. Yet the occasional jolt suggests hardcore suspension tuning… until you pitch the Turbo X hard into a turn. Then the Swedish flagship heels over and the outside front tire scrubs towards the outside curb. Despite the trick all-wheel-drive system, the Turbo X’s general inclination is toward understeer. Numb, slow steering operated via an oversized (but nicely padded) steering wheel doesn’t help.
So, any potential for some sideways hoonage? The initial prognosis was not good. Despite repeated attempts to induce oversteer, the Turbo X continued to plow. But then I found it: dip deep into the throttle during low-speed sharp turns, preferably on gravel, and the tail will step out, sometimes more than you’d like it to. At which point the stability control doesn’t seem to do much. No matter, the car remains easy to control, and a touch of opposite lock straightens up the X’s line.
While occasional throttle-induced oversteer makes for more fun than none at all, the trick all-wheel-drive system and suspension need to be retuned to shift from understeer to oversteer in a more linear fashion. In a good rear-wheel-drive car, you can progressively dial-in a precise amount of oversteer. In the Saab, you get dull understeer unless you do the sort of things you’re just not going to do in normal driving. Perhaps there’s just no substitute for an inherently balanced, rear-drive chassis.
Saab desperately needs a great car, one that provides the sort of unique driving experience that gave the brand a brief golden age in the mid-1980s. Sadly, the 9-3 Turbo X isn’t it. Saab’s engineers lacked either the nerve or the authority to push this car as far as it needed to go. As a result, the Turbo X will please neither those seeking luxury nor those seeking an engaging driving experience.
[Saab provided the vehicle reviewed, insurance and a tank of gas]
Join the conversation
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Master Baiter It’s hard to make predictions, especially about the future. It will be interesting to see if demand for Ford’s EVs will match the production capacity they are putting on line.
- Brett Woods 2023 Corvette base model.
- Paul Taka Hi, where can I find 1982 Honda prelude junkyards in 50 states
- Poltergeist Make sure you order the optional Dungdai fire suppression system.
- Prabirmehta I charge my EV at home 100% of the time. The EV is used for in-town driving and the gas guzzling SUV is used for out of town trips. This results in a huge cost saving and rare trips to the gas station.
This article makes me sick ... Beemers shouldn't right on other brand to destroy a good car ... WTF ??? for the 1 to 2 gearing ??? Well ... who can be as proud as Saab for load of low en torque ??? what's the point of shiftin 5000rpm when you have all the torque @ 2000 ??? Why use 1 and 2 close when you can pass by any other cars while other need to shift ??? This gearing has been made to have constant performance whatever speed (shorter at high speed, longer at low speed) to take advantage of all the torque of saab .... That guy is a wanna be, the site is close to it ... Reliability ??? Fuck ! change you fuking oil guy !!! I've had 7 saabs (5 turbo charged) high mileage, track and teaching with it, never had gasket or reliability problem ... but all the best oil and changed @ 5/6000km MAX The saab X received a pretty good and modern XWD ... well after 20 or 30 year teaching all other car makers on car technology ... it's pretty cheap payd ... just a XWD ... On many way, saab had advance on honda, subaru, mercedes, Bmw, whatever american, volvo and more. not just 6 month but years in advance !!! on turbo charging, X safty brake lines, ACC, heated seats, ventilated seats, lights wipers, passive security, active security, shit load of low end torque (especially for 4 cyl 16v !!!) ... in 1993 Saab had the same torque with a 4cyl as a 2008 Acura V6, 3000 rpm lower ...
Well, I am a bit late to the party here but I am going to leave my two cents. All of the Saab bashing here is pathetic. This was an extremely poor review for a great car. I have two Saabs and plan on buying a third soon. My 9-3 has 178000 miles on it and drives like a dream. No issues other than normal wear and tear. Saab is expensive because they are built to withstand nearly anything. When someone crashes a Saab, the impact of whatever it hits is spread out along the car..to absorb impact better and to minimize damage and injury.The engine is designed to slide under the car instead of crashing into the passenger area. EVERYTHING is about protecting the passenger cell. That information comes directly from men who built this car in Sweden! Go google the youtube video showing a Saab and a BMW being dropped upside down from 8ft. The BMW smashes as flat as a pancake. You would have been able to push the door and exit the Saab. So, my guess is all of these bashers have never even so much as SAT in a Saab..and that includes the author of this poorly written review.