GM Books $4.2b Net Loss in Q3; Bankrupt By December

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

The Wall Street Journal reports GM’s statement on its dismal Q3 results. The General’s general admits that “estimated liquidity during the remainder of 2008 will approach the minimum amount necessary to operate its business.” So, essentially, unless GM gets a federal bailout by 12/31/08, the artist formerly known as the world’s largest automaker will be forced to file Chapter 11. And no wonder, given GM’s cash burn reported [with all the numbers] by Yahoo! Finance. “Cash, marketable securities, and readily-available assets of the Voluntary Employees’ Beneficiary Association (VEBA) trust totaled $16.2 billion on September 30, 2008, down from $21.0 billion on June 30, 2008… The change in liquidity reflects negative adjusted operating cash flow of $6.9 billion in the third quarter 2008.” The entire “money shot” quote after the jump.

“Even if GM implements the planned operating actions that are substantially within its control, GM’s estimated liquidity during the remainder of 2008 will approach the minimum amount necessary to operate its business. Looking into the first two quarters of 2009, even with its planned actions, the company’s estimated liquidity will fall significantly short of that amount unless economic and automotive industry conditions significantly improve, it receives substantial proceeds from asset sales, takes more aggressive working capital initiatives, gains access to capital markets and other private sources of funding, receives government funding under one or more current or future programs, or some combination of the foregoing. The success of GM’s plans necessarily depends on other factors, including global economic conditions and the level of automotive sales, particularly in the United States and Western Europe.”

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 79 comments
  • Happy_Endings Happy_Endings on Nov 08, 2008
    Barry, Nancy, and Harry to the rescue. GM's not lasting until January. They'll be gone by Festivus if nothing is done. Which means the Republicans will also have to get involved somehow.
  • Tate Tate on Nov 09, 2008

    It was coming, but its sooner than expected. The US Gov should sell all the brands to large Private Equity Companies (similar to a Chrysler and Cerebus Capital) and provide tax holidays and provide support for new green field production factories (thus helping economy) and in the meantime the brands can share production facilities at the existing factories and keep selling the current cars. This will develop new dealerships and supply chains etc and help boost the economy. Its hard and might sound stupid currently but will make sense in the long term future. For example- Maybe the Pontiac brand will down the years become a specialist high performance name like the Porsche or lotus. While Saab may become a specialty in hybrid technology.

  • Brandon I would vote for my 23 Escape ST-Line with the 2.0L turbo and a normal 8 speed transmission instead of CVT. 250 HP, I average 28 MPG and get much higher on trips and get a nice 13" sync4 touchscreen. It leaves these 2 in my dust literally
  • JLGOLDEN When this and Hornet were revealed, I expected BOTH to quickly become best-sellers for their brands. They look great, and seem like interesting and fun alternatives in a crowded market. Alas, ambitious pricing is a bridge too far...
  • Zerofoo Modifications are funny things. I like the smoked side marker look - however having seen too many cars with butchered wire harnesses, I don't buy cars with ANY modifications. Pro-tip - put the car back to stock before you try and sell it.
  • JLGOLDEN I disagree with the author's comment on the current Murano's "annoying CVT". Murano's CVT does not fake shifts like some CVTs attempt, therefore does not cause shift shock or driveline harshness while fumbling between set ratios. Murano's CVT feels genuinely smooth and lets the (great-sounding V6) engine sing and zing along pleasantly.
  • JLGOLDEN Our family bought a 2012 Murano AWD new, and enjoyed it for 280K before we sold it last month. CVT began slipping at 230K but it was worth fixing a clean, well-cared for car. As soon as we sold the 2012, I grabbed a new 2024 Murano before the body style and powertrain changes for 2025, and (as rumored) goes to 4-cyl turbo. Sure, the current Murano feels old-school, with interior switchgear and finishes akin to a 2010 Infiniti. That's not a bad thing! Feels solid, V6 sounds awesome, and the whole platform has been around long enough that future parts & service wont be an issue.
Next