AutoNation Reports $1.4b Q3 Loss

John Horner
by John Horner
AutoNation’s third quarter 2008 financial release is more grim news. The US’ largest automotive retailer reported “a 2008 third quarter net loss from continuing operations of $1.40 billion or $7.95 per share.” Total sales revenue was down 22%, driven by a new vehicle unit sales decline of 24%. Overall industry unit sales for the period were down 31%, a set of numbers consistent with the observation that smaller dealerships are going belly up. As one of the big boys, AutoNation is doing a little better than the averages. We know that the small, and some not so small (Bill Heard, groan) dealerships are dropping like proverbial flies. AutoNation’s press release provides commendable detail on the domestic brand, import brand and premium luxury business segments. No real surprises there. Domestic brands got whacked with a 57% revenue decline while import brands and “premium luxury” both dropped 23%. The usual suspects of tight credit markets, high fuel costs and scarred silly non-buyers are duly noted. Operations wise, AutoNation squeezed out a $159 million profit for the quarter compared to $226 million in 2007’s equivalent period, a 29% drop off largely inline with the revenue hit. Why then the huge reported loss?: Value of the company’s domestic branded franchises. These dealerships were bought from small groups and owner-operators over the years. When purchased, the amount of the purchase price in excess of the real estate, inventory and any other hard assets of the business was booked as “goodwill and/or franchise” value. Today market value for a domestic branded car dealership is zero, so AutoNation had to write off $1.46 billion in recognition of the new reality. If and when those values ever go back up, AutoNation will be able to book an upside … but let’s not hold our breath.
John Horner
John Horner

More by John Horner

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 6 comments
  • Bertel Schmitt Bertel Schmitt on Nov 07, 2008

    Two interesting items to watch: One: "Third quarter Domestic retail new vehicle unit sales declined 36%. In comparison, U.S. industry Domestic retail new vehicle unit sales declined 33% according to CNW Research. Third quarter Import retail new vehicle unit sales declined 18%. In comparison, U.S. industry Import new vehicle retail unit sales declined 26% according to CNW Research." Looks like improts are still half alive at Autonation, compared with Domestics that took a much bigger hit (and from the October numbers trickling in, will be on the mat.) Autonation doesn't seem to agree with CNW on the import numbers .... Two: The huge writeoff for goodwill is interesting. Goodwill is an accountant's play-doh. Times are bad. These days, you are suprising nobody with an "Ouch!" to the common question "How's business?" Expect everybody to round up all financial sceletons tucked away in the lateral file cabinets, and write them off. "Hey, times are bad!" We'll have accrued losses for years to come. Tax revenue will go down the tubes. Maybe Obama will change his mind. Who wants that kinda job?

  • Jerseydevil Jerseydevil on Nov 07, 2008

    what of asbury auto? another mega dealer holding company. http://www.asburyauto.com/home.aspx

  • Lou_BC Blows me away that the cars pictured are just 2 door vehicles. How much space do you need to fully open them?
  • Daniel J Isn't this sort of a bait and switch? I mean, many of these auto plants went to the south due to the lack of unions. I'd also be curious as how, at least in my own state, unions would work since the state is a right to work state, meaning employees can still work without being apart of the union.
  • EBFlex No they shouldn’t. It would be signing their death warrant. The UAW is steadfast in moving as much production out of this country as possible
  • Groza George The South is one of the few places in the U.S. where we still build cars. Unionizing Southern factories will speed up the move to Mexico.
  • FreedMike I'd say that question is up to the southern auto workers. If I were in their shoes, I probably wouldn't if the wages/benefits were at at some kind of parity with unionized shops. But let's be clear here: the only thing keeping those wages/benefits at par IS the threat of unionization.
Next