Question of the Day: Dual-Clutch Flappy Paddles or a Good Stick?


Everyday it seems more and more manufacturers are turning to DSG-style solutions for cog-swapping. Just yesterday Farago reported that Porsche is finally getting into the dual-clutch game (and seeing as how they pioneered the technology back in the day, why not?) But, why? Automatic transmissions make most of the people happy most of the time. However, if "performance" is the second, third or even fourth metric you consider when purchasing a car, slushboxes suck. By giving the people the means to shift for themselves, a bit of that suckage is mitigated. Up until the semi-widespread adoption of dual-clutch systems, manumatics have always been a major let down. Clutchless manuals have been even worse (I'm looking at you, Maserati). Both Farago and Berkowitz have been unrepentant in their love of Volkswagen's DSG solution, yet I still think it pales in comparison to a stick and a clutch. It's fast, sure, but where's the feel? Where's the art? Plus, I didn't spend years perfecting heel-and-toe downshifts for nothing, did I? Anyhow, what do you think?
Comments
Join the conversation
Ultimately electric drive is the future. Soon the transmission will be obsolete so the Flappy Paddles may not even outlive the manual. My goal is to have no transmission at all, if it isn't manual. But I figure I have another 10-20 years of manual shift cars. Eventually my main vehicle will likely be electric drive, but I will keep an old manual for Sunday drives and scaring the youngsters. :-)
Thankfully I have the advantage of two vehicles: one an auto and one a manual. The 2nd car is the first auto I’ve ever owned and I have to admit it is nice to relax and drive it some days. But for the most part I’ll always have a manual and given the choice between the two I’ll opt to go with the 3rd pedal. I need to be in control of the shift points and I do like to skip gears. Hell who am I kidding, it’s just more fun.
Anything without a clutch.