By The Numbers: May Showers Detroit's Customers With Profit-Killing Incentives
Last month, I field tested a new methodology for analyzing the American car market. Reader feedback on TTAC’s month-by-month sales charts of “key” U.S. models was overwhelmingly positive. Your most excellent comments and insightful methodological suggestions were noted, logged and, where possible, incorporated. OK, so, May car sales were the highest so far this calendar year. Without further ado, here’s how our 19 models floated within this rising tide.
Taken as a whole, U.S. passenger car sales showed a sharp upturn in May. The Chevrolet Impala , Chrysler 300 and Toyota Camry all rebounded from their April dip. Ford did not share in this good fortune. After climbing steadily, Fusion sales dropped below 2006 levels for the first time since last November.
The Camry’s still the segment leader, but the Impala’s coming on fast. The mid-sized Canadian is now selling more briskly than it did during GM’s epic “fire sale for everyone” back in 2005 and was GM's best-selling passenger car in May. That said, GM lavished $1500 in incentives on the Impala– the highest amount they offer on a Chevrolet passenger car.
For the first time since February, Silverado sales have topped last year’s levels. The good news comes with a minor caveat: GM is still producing and selling the “Classic” (non GMT900-based) Silverado, a cheaper model that’s buoyed by $2k to $3K rebates and dealer incentives. Still, the new model’s leading the charge.
Meanwhile, assisted by massive incentives (up to $5K rebates plus dealer incentives) the Dodge Ram also bested last year’s number. Chryslerberus is planning a redesigned Ram for 2009 with diesel engines across the board. They’ll most likely increase the incentives to keep current sales from tanking in anticipation of the new model.
Ford's F-Series continues to show lower sales than in previous years. Look for Ford to add to its $3k rebate as the Glass House Gang fight to keep their perennial best-seller at the top of the sales charts.
Tundra sales showed another record month. It remains to be seen if the model’s camshaft problems will damage the Tundra’s momentum, or if Toyota’s rep for bulletproof build quality will reduce the issue to a minor bump in the road.
In any case, the Toyota’s entry into a declining market has had the anticipated effect: pickup truck margins are down across the board.
Dodge and Toyota weren’t so lucky; Durango and 4Runner sales both continue their downward trajectory. The Durango has practically flat-lined in the mid-4K range, while 4Runner sales are the lowest they’ve been since last October.
CUV sales split into two distinct camps: the old and the new. Sales of the elderly Chevrolet Equinox and Chrysler Pacifica fell well below those of previous years. If Chevy and Chrysler want to remain competitive in this hot market segment, they have to hit refresh in a big way, and fast.
Sales of the recently refreshed Ford Escape and Toyota RAV-4 rose sharply. The more boldly grilled Escape hit an all-time high in May, with the gas – electric hybrid model accounting for 14 percent of the total. RAV-4 sales were up by more than 2K units over last month, and against the same month last year.
All three of the new-for-‘07 models I’m tracking showed increases in May. The Jeep Compass rebounded slightly above last month’s performance, but still remains below the curve for the year. The GMC Acadia continues almost straight-line steady growth. After an inexplicable dip last month, Ford Edge sales are back, and they ain’t bad.
GM, Chrysler and Toyota all saw higher sales in May than in April, and with higher sales than May ’06. Even though Ford showed an increase from April, they still remain well below the previous years’ sales levels. (For cumulative sales YTD, click here: GM, Chrysler, Ford, Toyota .) But the numbers mask a worrying development.
In spite of The Big 2.8’s pledge to wean themselves from incentives, they haven’t. In May, GM’s incentives rose 6.1 percent (year on year) to a $2,950 per vehicle average. Ford’s incentives rose by 4.6 percent to $4,040 per vehicle. Chrysler's incentives soared by 7.1 percent to an average of $4,178 per vehicle. (Toyota’s incentives averaged $1,140 per vehicle.)
This does not bode well for Detroit. In 2006, GM and Chrysler’s North American operations lost an average of $1,436 and $1,072 respectively per vehicle. Ford lost a whopping $5,234 per vehicle. In contrast, Toyota and Honda made $1,200 on every vehicle sold. The greater Detroit’s incentives, the lower their profits. Or, let’s face it, the greater their losses. It’s still early daze, but 2007 is turning out to be a “make or break” year for The Big 2.8.
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Dusterdude @El scotto , I'm aware of the history, I have been in the "working world" for close to 40 years with many of them being in automotive. We have to look at situation in the "big picture". Did UAW make concessions in past ? - yes. Do they deserve an increase now ? -yes . Is their pay increase reasonable given their current compensation package ? Not at all ! By the way - are the automotive CEO's overpaid - definitely! (That is the case in many industries, and a separate topic). As the auto industry slowly but surely moves to EV's , the "big 3" will need to be producing top quality competitive vehicles or they will not survive.
- Art_Vandelay “We skipped it because we didn’t think anyone would want to steal these things”-Hyundai
- El scotto Huge lumbering SUV? Check. Unknown name soon to be made popular by Tiktok ilk? Check. Scads of these showing up in school drop-off lines? Check. The only real over/under is if these will have as much cachet as Land Rovers themselves? A bespoken item had to be new at one time. Bonus "accepted by the right kind of people" points if EBFlex or Tassos disapproves.
- El scotto No, "brothers and sisters" are the core strength of the union. So you'll take less money and less benefits because "my company really needs helped out"? The UAW already did that with two-tier employees and concessions on their last contract.The Big 3 have never, ever locked out the UAW. The Big 3 have agreed to every collective bargaining agreement since WWII. Neither side will change.
- El scotto Never mind that that F-1 is a bigger circus than EBFlex and Tassos shopping together for their new BDSM outfits and personal lubricants. Also, the F1 rumor mill churns more than EBFlex's mind choosing a new Sharpie to make his next "Free Candy" sign for his white Ram work van. GM will spend a year or two learning how things work in F1. By the third or fourth year GM will have a competitive "F-1 LS" engine. After they win a race or two Ferrari will protest to highest F-1 authorities. Something not mentioned: Will GM get tens of millions of dollars from F-1? Ferrari gets 30 million a year as a participation trophy.