General Motors' Branding Fiasco Part Three – Pontiac Only Lived Twice

Paul Niedermeyer
by Paul Niedermeyer
general motors branding fiasco part three 8211 pontiac only lived twice

Grand Prix, GTO, Firebird, LeMans, Catalina 2+2, Bonneville. The names evoke automotive magic— provided you were an enthusiast between six and sixty during the ‘60’s. For today’s pistonheads, these storied names; indeed, the entire Pontiac brand has lost its adrenal association. Even the drop-dead gorgeous Solstice can’t rescue a marque now known for budget-priced, badge-engineered mediocrity. Pontiac’s fall from grace may not be the worst (best?) example of GM’s branding cataclysm, but it’s one of the most emotive.

GM created Pontiac in 1926, naming it after a local Indian chief who led a failed rebellion against the British. The company’s first car was an inexpensive six-cylinder “companion” to the Oakland brand’s pricier machine. Pontiac waxed while Oakland waned. The Depression killed Oakland; Pontiac barely survived.

To reduce production costs, GM President Alfred P. Sloan and Executive Vice President William S. Knudsen decreed that Pontiacs should share major components with Chevrolet. In 1933, a last minute “big car” restyle and a new engine helped Pontiac’s “Economy Straight Eight” revive the brand’s fortunes.

In Sloan’s “a car for every pocketbook” dictum, Pontiac’s prices slotted in exactly between the most expensive Chevy and the cheapest Oldsmobile. The positioning defined the brand; a Pontiac was a realistic step up the ownership ladder for the Chevy driver of the thirties. Ironically, Pontiacs were aimed at customers who cared more about economy and comfort than performance and handling.

As the Depression eased, Pontiac stayed in the sweet spot, introducing its resolutely conservative, middle class customers to industry-firsts like the column-mounted gear shift and engine options. In the last years before WWII, Frank Hershey led Pontiac’s design studio to new heights.

Pontiac’s post-War years were profitable, but the pricing and styling demarcations that protected Pontiac from cannibalism were under attack from below (Chevrolet) and above (Oldsmobile). By ’56, the division was once again in trouble, struggling to distinguish itself from its more successful brother brands.

The division had been feeding their V8 a high-oats diet. By ’59, Pontiac’s tri-power (three two-barrel carburetors) 389 was churning out 345 horsepower. That same year, out of the blue, Pontiac introduced “wide track” styling.

Although the marque had gone racing several years earlier, the new models’ purposeful stance and stylish sheetmetal instantly redefined Pontiac as a performance brand.

Their timing couldn’t have been better. Increasingly affluent and unflaggingly optimistic Americans were ready to fully embrace a car brand offering youthfulness, style, and most of all, excitement. From ‘62 to ‘70, Pontiac was America’s third most popular automotive brand.

The first of Pontiac’s high-water marks: the 1963 Grand Prix coupe. A Bill Mitchell styling masterpiece, the GP conveyed the exclusiveness and formal elegance of the Buick Riviera coupe, at about three-fourths the price. AND it was sportier and more youthful; the killer date car of the times.

The 1964 GTO was THE seminal performance car of the era. By dropping the big 389 engine into the light, mid-size Tempest (along with suspension, tire, appearance and interior upgrades), the American enthusiast car reached its zenith. As did Pontiac.

In this pre-German/Japanese invasion era of fossilized British roadsters, the GTO (and its many imitators) offered the best overall bang-for-the-buck equation. Pontiac was BMW before BMW was cool (or available).

Except for the Firebird, the seventies were not kind to Pontiac. Performance was (mostly) out, styling become blobby and quality problems were notorious. Pontiac tumbled out of the coveted number three spot. It returned to its pre-sixties roots: a mostly boring, lost-in-the-shuffle GM division, saddled with an endless curse of badge-engineered small Chevys: Phoenix, Astre, Sunbird, J-2000, T-1000, etc.

Having lost its authentic performance and styling “cool,” Pontiac began an endless series of self-conscious attempts to capture BMW-like cachet (e.g. the original 1973 Grand Am).

The mid-late eighties witnessed a brief sales resurgence. These were smallish cars, like the later front wheel-drive Grand Am. But these sales came straight out of ailing Olds’ and Buick’s hide, not the booming imports.

The more avidly Pontiac tried to “Build Excitement” in the eighties and nineties, the more pathetic the results: GM clones sporting way too many spoilers and garish body cladding. Pontiac had become the Wal-Mart BMW.

Could Pontiac have become a legitimate American BMW? Perhaps. A return to the brand’s original re-positioning would have required an unwavering commitment to performance. The resources were certainly there. GM continued building formidable rear wheel-drive sedans in Europe and Australia. These should have been Pontiac’s specialty decades ago, long before the recent GTO and future G8.

Instead, GM positioned Pontiac as a “full-line” automaker, forcing it to compete with its GM siblings with idiotic versions of identical products.

Pontiac is a dead brand. Lacking any presence outside of North America, it has no relevance to GM’s global future. Excitement is a fleeting phenomenon, as was Pontiac’s heyday.

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 54 comments
  • Nino Nino on May 25, 2007
    indi500fan: May 23rd, 2007 at 11:57 am My neighbor has an 88 Fiero GT for sale on his front lawn. The darn thing looks as good or better than anything on the road now. They got the problems fixed just in time to kill it off. (Of course it shouldn’t take 5 model years to fix the problems.) One of those with a 260 hp DI turbo Ecotec would be a fun ride. My kind of post! I still have a soft spot for the Fiero even though the '85 GT I had broke a clutch and flywheel at 7300 miles ( just broke into bits and which the dealer refused to pay for). I still look around if any are for sale and start fantasizing about V8 Northstars in the engine bay...cut rate Ferrari performance....etc. Then my wife screams at me that we have too many cars already!

  • Nino Nino on May 25, 2007

    I think that the Pontiac G6 is a handsome design (in the CamCord sense), but extremely poorly executed. Given an interior upgrade and a name change (Grand-Am?), I believe this car can be a hit. Of all the cars based on this platform, I believe it be the best looking. The availability of a coupe and convertible are big plusses.

  • Jeff S Corey--We know but we still want to give our support to you and let TTAC know that your articles are excellent and better than what the typical articles are.
  • Jeff S A sport utility vehicle or SUV is a car classification that combines elements of road-going passenger cars with features from off-road vehicles, such as raised ground clearance and four-wheel drive.There is no commonly agreed-upon definition of an SUV and usage of the term varies between countries. Thus, it is "a loose term that traditionally covers a broad range of vehicles with four-wheel drive." Some definitions claim that an SUV must be built on a light truck chassis; however, broader definitions consider any vehicle with off-road design features to be an SUV. A [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossover_(automobile)]crossover SUV[/url] is often defined as an SUV built with a unibody construction (as with passenger cars), however, the designations are increasingly blurred because of the capabilities of the vehicles, the labelling by marketers, and electrification of new models.The predecessors to SUVs date back to military and low-volume models from the late 1930s, and the four-wheel drive station wagons and carryalls that began to be introduced in 1949. The 1984 [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeep_Cherokee_(XJ)]Jeep Cherokee (XJ)[/url] is considered to be the first SUV in the modern style. Some SUVs produced today use unibody construction; however, in the past, more SUVs used body-on-frame construction. During the late 1990s and early 2000s, the popularity of SUVs greatly increased, often at the expense of the popularity of large [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedan_(automobile)]sedans[/url] and station wagons.More recently, smaller SUVs, mid-size, and crossovers have become increasingly popular. SUVs are currently the world's largest automotive segment and accounted for 45.9% of the world's passenger car market in 2021. SUVs have been criticized for a variety of environmental and safety-related reasons. They generally have poorer fuel efficiency and require more resources to manufacture than smaller vehicles, contributing more to climate change and environmental degradation. Between 2010 and 2018 SUVs were the second largest contributor to the global increase in carbon emissions worldwide. Their higher center of gravity increases their risk of rollovers. Their larger mass increases their stopping distance, reduces visibility, and increases damage to other road users in collisions. Their higher front-end profile makes them at least twice as likely to kill pedestrians they hit. Additionally, the psychological sense of security they provide influences drivers to drive less cautiously. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sport_utility_vehicleWith the above definition of SUV any vehicle that is not a pickup truck if it is enclosed, doesn't have a trunk, and is jacked up with bigger tires. If the green activists adhere to this definition of what an SUV is there will be millions of vehicles with flat tires which include HRVs, Rav4s, CRVs, Ford Escapes, Buick Encores, and many of compact and subcompact vehicles. The green movement is going to have to recruit millions of new followers and will be busy flattening millions of tires in the US and across the globe. Might be easier to protest.
  • Sckid213 I actually do agree that most Nissans are ultimately junk. (I also think many BMWs are also). I was talking challenging the 3 in terms of driving dynamics. Agree all were failures in sales.
  • THX1136 More accurately said, we are seeing exponential growth in the manufacturing capabilities in this market. Unless, of course, all those vehicles are sold with customers waiting until more a produced so they can buy. Indeed, there are certainly more EVs being purchased now than back in 2016. Is demand outstripping manufacturing? Maybe or maybe not. I sincerely don't know which is why I ask.
  • ToolGuy The page here (linked in the writeup) is ridiculously stupid https://www.tyreextinguishers.com/how-to-spot-an-suvLike, seriously stupid, e.g., A) Not sure that particular Volvo is killing the planet as quickly as some other vehicles we might choose. B) A Juke is "huge"??? C) The last picture shows a RAV4 Hybrid?
Next