The Truth About This Website's Future
It’s been while since I’ve written about The Truth About Cars (TTAC). As you may recall, we were preparing to turn TTAC into a subscription site when we re-launched. When I discovered that our payment software wasn’t ready for prime time, and the site design needed tweaking, I put the move on hold. I’ve used the interregnum to ramp up our content, familiarize myself with the new site’s back end, commission a few improvements and… think. I’ve re-read all your emails, sent out a survey, talked to a bunch of financial folks and come up with a new plan. Here’s how I see it…
Imagine TTAC as a gated community. By closing the gates (making it members only), we can maintain the site’s high quality housing (our rants and reviews) while avoiding “outside” pollution and crime (advertiser influence). You can play (read and comment) with like-minded enthusiasts, safe from flame-throwers (flame throwers). After surveying our readers, I know a fair few of you believe that our mission is worthwhile, and that paying $5 a month for this little corner of cyberspace is a fair proposition. That said, timing is. Everything.
Before we changed the site design, TTAC had 22k unique visitors per day. When we made the jump, we lost 8k daily visitors, and our momentum. The drop happened for two main reasons. First, our New Content Notification system and RSS feeds went south. Some of the faithful lost touch. (Both systems are back on-line.) Second, our Google links evaporated, which accounted for about 20% of our previous traffic. (These too have been resurrected.) We’re recovering lost ground, one reader at a time. When we get back up to a large and healthy pool of potential subscribers, I can make the switch to subscription-only, confident that the take-up rate will make it worth our while. But–
Once the gates are closed, the chances of recruiting new members will diminish dramatically. Sure, automotive enthusiasts will still find their way to our door. But the vast majority will look at the fancy gates and click on down the road. And then I thought of a golf resort. The general public is free to hang out at the main hotel. If they choose, they can spend some time and money at the hotel’s restaurants and shops. But they’ve got to pay to play. And if they want to play golf on a regular basis, they have to become members. In other words, TTAC needs both an exclusive members-only section AND a less exclusive “free” section.
In practice, the new site’s member section would look and work much as it does now. I hesitate to call the free section “TTAC lite,” but one part of the non-members site would offer mini-reviews, much like the format I designed for Part Two of Jalopnik’s reviews (stars with a few descriptive sentences). Another, equally important aspect would be comparative data for car shoppers. At least initially, we’re talking price, options and reliability info. I’m currently negotiating with a gentleman who collects this kind of data. He's one with the TTAC brand: complete editorial integrity and total transparency.
So, TTAC would have a subscription-only “intellectual” side for passionate, witty and informed reviews and rants. And we’d have a free “practical” side for mini-reviews and useful buying information. The duality would allow BOTH sides of the site to grow and prosper, as the free side entices visitors into becoming paid subscribers while, at the same time, offering us new and exciting revenue streams (which I can’t discuss at the present time). Again, I can assure you that neither side would compromise our overarching commitment to honesty, ethics and public service. It is, after all, our brand. Without that, The Truth About Cars means nothing. Is nothing.
So, what do you think? Is there are a market for what I’ve described? Would a nuts-and-bolts aspect to TTAC cheapen our literary aspirations? Do you think we should hold off on turning into a subscription site until the practical side is in place? At the same time and in any case, how can we increase TTAC’s site traffic? I’m a writer/editor by nature, but now that I’ve got the posting down to a routine, I’ve got time to market this sucker. (NB: From now on, during the weekdays, I’ll be posting new material first thing in the morning, mid-afternoon and early evening.) Any help in this area would be most appreciated. Please leave your comments here.
Meanwhile, I want to take this opportunity to thank TTAC’s writers. I will be forever grateful for their time, talent, humor and integrity. Let no one say that the buff books’ have the best writers. The future of automotive journalism is right here, right now. Thanks guys, for telling the truth about cars. Working with you is an honor and a privilege.
More by Robert Farago
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Rust-MyEnemy Whoa, what the hell is wrong with Jalop1991 and his condescension? It's as if he's employed by Big Plug-In or something."I've seen plenty of your types on the forums....."Dunno what that means, but I'm not dead keen on being regarded as "A type" by a complete stranger"" I'm guessing you've never actually calculated by hand the miles you've driven against the quantity of gas used--which is your actual miles per gallon."Guess again. Why the hell would you even say that? Yes, I worked it out. Fill-to-fill, based on gas station receipts. And it showed me that a Vauxhall Astra PHEV, starting out with a fully charged PHEV battery, in Hybrid mode, on my long (234-mile) daily motorway daily commute, never, over several months, ever matched or beat the economy of the regular hybrid Honda Civic that I ran for a similar amount of time (circa 5000 miles)."You don't use gasoline at all for 30-40 miles as you use exclusively battery power, then your vehicle is a pure hybrid. Over 234 miles, you will have used whatever gas the engine used for 200 of those miles."At least you're right on that. In hybrid mode, though, the Astra was using battery power when it wasn't at all appropriate. The petrol engine very rarely chimed in when battery power was on tap, and as a result, the EV-mode range quickly disappeared. The regular hybrid Civic, though, deployed its very small electric reserves (which are used up quickly but restore themselves promptly), much more wisely. Such as when on a trailing throttle or on a downward grade, or when in stop-start traffic. As a result, at the end of my 234 miles, the Civic had used less gas than the Astra. Moreover, I hadn't had to pay for the electricity in its battery.I look forward to you arguing that what actually happened isn't what actually happened, but I was there and you were not."Regardless, that you don't understand it appears not to have stopped you from pontificating on it. Please, do us all a favor--don't vote."You really are quite unpleasant, aren't you. But thanks for the advice.
- Tassos Jong-iL Electric vehicles are mandated by 2020 in One Korea. We are ahead of the time.
- 1995_SC Can you still get some of the tax credits under the new program?
- Analoggrotto HyundaiGenesisKia saw this coming a long time ago and are poised for hybrid and plug-in hybrid segment leadership:[list=1][*] The most extensive range of hybrids[/*][*]Highest hybrid sales proportion over any other model [/*][*]Best YouTube reviews [/*][*]Highest number of consumer reports best picks [/*][*]Class leading ATPs among all hybrid vehicles and PHEVs enjoy segment bearing eATPs[/*][/list=1]While some brands like Toyota have invested and wasted untold fortunes into full range electric lineups HyundaiKiaGenesis has taken the right approach here.
- EBFlex The answer is yes. Anyone that says no is just….. wrong.But the government doesn’t want people to have that much freedom and the politicians aren’t making money off PHEVs or HEVs. So they will be stifled.