Pretty much most of the world’s large automakers plan a commercial launch of fuel cell vehicles in 2015, Hyundai even earlier. One of the hot spots could be Scandinavia. At the end of a month-long hydrogen-powered tour through Europe, Toyota, Nissan, Honda and Hyundai signed an agreement to jointly promote fuel cell vehicles in Norway, Sweden, Iceland and Denmark. (Read More…)
Tag: FCV

The Michigan Congressional delegation’s letter, stating that the Detroit-based automakers are not technologically capable of serving the market while complying with a proposed 2025 CAFE standard seemed strange to me in light of the recent progress made by Ford and GM on fuel economy. Why, I wondered, would these firms boast of their fuel econmy efforts on the one hand while allowing their congressional representatives to portray them as unable to build a CAFE-compliant fleet on the other. Why, I wondered, don’t Ford and GM come out and angrily insist that they can build the most fuel efficient cars in the world? My guess: because they know that they can probably wheedle a loophole out of the feds if they keep pleading inability. Yes, everyone knows they can comply with CAFE… but even the UAW knows that when the government asks you to do something, you ask for something back. Which in turn made me wonder: what might the OEMs want? And, turning to the 2012-2016 CAFE Final Rule [go on, give it a read in PDF format here], I found a glaring loophole that all the manufacturers seemed to want, but which the feds turned down. I have no evidence that this is back on the table for 2017-2025, but I thought I’d put it out there to give a sense of what the OEMs may be pushing for by pleading inability to comply with the proposed 2025 standard.
Hydrogen Fuel Cell vehicles (FCVs) are enjoying something of a comeback lately, as everyone from Hyundai and Honda to GM and Daimler are talking about forthcoming production versions of test-fleet FCVs. And with EVs poised to both dominate the short-term green-car game and inevitably disappoint consumers, it’s no surprise that the perennial “fuel of the future” is enjoying a fresh look from automakers. But if high cost and range anxiety are the flies in the EV ointment, the FCV-boosters are finding their hydrogen cars tend to suffer from the same problems. Daimler says
By 2015, we think a fuel cell car will not cost more than a four-cylinder diesel hybrid that meets the Euro 6 emissions standard.
but that by no means guarantees its Mercedes FCV will be truly “affordable” by any reasonable standard, as diesel-electrics are considered one of the most expensive applications of internal combustion power. And then there’s the whole range issue. Yes, FCVs refuel faster than EVs, but even the most ambitious of Hydrogen-boosters, Daimler, are only pushing vehicles with a 250-mile range. Which is why we puzzled a bit over The Globe And Mail‘s assesment that
Three Mercedes-Benz B-Class F-CELL models will make [a 125-day] global trek, which will seek to highlight the real-world benefits of fuel cells versus EVs – mainly their much further range
Flipping over to AutoMotorundSport, we find that the irony which completely escaped the G&M is threatening to overwhelm Daimler’s entire demonstration. And, as is only natural when things like this occur, there’s a bizarre TTAC connection…
Lithium-ion batteries aren’t the only automotive cleantech that appears to be getting cheaper. Toyota’s head of advanced autos, Yoshihiko Masuda, tells Bloomberg that the Japanese automaker has cut the cost of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (FCVs) by 90 percent in the last five years or so. Mid-decade, Toyota’s per-car estimates for FCVs ran near a million dollars per car. With costs now closer to the $100k mark, Toyota says it plans to cut that number in half by 2015. If they can make that happen, Masuda says, a $50k hydrogen FCV will be on like Donkey Kong.




Recent Comments
Marcelo de Vasconcellos - it’s a very good moment to be an engineer, geologist. South Africa has also been attracting Brazilian...
jeffzekas - I suppose if you are comparing BMW with Yugo, then said car would be considered “reliable”. BMW CARS ARE EXPENSIVE, HIGH MAINTENANCE, AND...
doctor olds - @HDC- theatrics= “…out billions upon billions of dollars…”, “not buying anything remotely resembling GM”. The shortfall appears...
jeffzekas - If you’re going to recommend an RX-8, why not go all the way, and tell him to buy an Alfa Romeo? “It is not because the truth is too difficult...
jeffzekas - “There is no reason a carefully bought M3 can’t be a reliable daily driver”- more proof that Beemer drivers are delusional. Even the BMW blog...
Whuffo2 - No matter what you buy, it’s a depreciating asset. As its value declines, it’ll want repairs, insurance, taxes, etc. Owning a car is more...
Whuffo2 - You’ve never actually done it, have you? Those older cars need more maintenance more often than modern vehicles. I can guarantee you that if you had this car in...
rpn453 - “Electric cars accelerate faster than ICE cars.” What an absurd statement. Which electric cars accelerate faster than which ICE cars?
walker42 - I heard Steve Lang quit today over the “dyke” article by Bertel. I was going to post in that thread to ask if it was true but the comments have been...
SteveRenwick - Ensure that the car is in the proper gear upon entry. I drove a rental Fiesta in Engalnd once which had an annoying tendency to go into third instead of...