BMW's (Ob)noxious Ad Shot Down

Cammy Corrigan
by Cammy Corrigan

The RAC (that’s the Royal version of the AAA, in case you don’t know) reports that BMW has run into trouble with the UK Advertising Standards Agency (ASA, that’s no film speed in the UK) with one of their adverts. In it, BMW claimed that its Z4 roadster had low levels of CO2 (you know CO2? That obnoxious gas which every government in the world is trying to reduce/tax?). The advert reads “Joy makes the most of every drop…So you can step on the accelerator, knowing Joy will minimise the CO2 emissions.” The advert ends with “BMW EfficientDynamics, Less emissions, More driving pleasure.” This riled two people enough to complain to the ASA. Now what could have been so contentious…?

Well, the answer to that question lies in the small print of the advert. In it, BMW states quite clearly that the car in question (a BMW Z4 sDrive 35is Roadster) emits 210g/km. Now to give this some context, 210g/km is band K in the UK car tax system (did I mention tax?), only 2 below the highest tax band. Hardly a Toyota Prius. Well, it seems BMW had a different interpretation of the advert. They argued that they were comparing the Z4 against the previous generation Z4. They also argued that the Z4 had the lowest emissions of any of its competitors’ comparable models. The ASA came down in favour of the complainers, citing that readers were likely to assume that BMW’s claims were a comparison against all cars and not just cars in its class. “Because an emission rate of 210 g/km was relatively high for any car, despite being lower than BMW’s previous model and some competitors’ similar specification vehicles, we concluded that the ad was likely to mislead without further qualification.” ASA said. It does make me wonder, though. Who’s looking at an advert for a sportscar and thinking “Wow! I’m killing the planet with my Insight! I’ve gotta get me that 3 litre, 6 cylinder roadster!”.

Wasn’t that one also banned? Picture courtesy hypebeast.com

Cammy Corrigan
Cammy Corrigan

More by Cammy Corrigan

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 4 comments
  • Psarhjinian Psarhjinian on Jul 22, 2010

    I love that they have laws against misleading advertising. That's like laws against fish breathing water.

  • Ott Ott on Jul 22, 2010

    It's easier to beg for forgiveness than to ask for permission.

  • Probert They already have hybrids, but these won't ever be them as they are built on the modular E-GMP skateboard.
  • Justin You guys still looking for that sportbak? I just saw one on the Facebook marketplace in Arizona
  • 28-Cars-Later I cannot remember what happens now, but there are whiteblocks in this period which develop a "tick" like sound which indicates they are toast (maybe head gasket?). Ten or so years ago I looked at an '03 or '04 S60 (I forget why) and I brought my Volvo indy along to tell me if it was worth my time - it ticked and that's when I learned this. This XC90 is probably worth about $300 as it sits, not kidding, and it will cost you conservatively $2500 for an engine swap (all the ones I see on car-part.com have north of 130K miles starting at $1,100 and that's not including freight to a shop, shop labor, other internals to do such as timing belt while engine out etc).
  • 28-Cars-Later Ford reported it lost $132,000 for each of its 10,000 electric vehicles sold in the first quarter of 2024, according to CNN. The sales were down 20 percent from the first quarter of 2023 and would “drag down earnings for the company overall.”The losses include “hundreds of millions being spent on research and development of the next generation of EVs for Ford. Those investments are years away from paying off.” [if they ever are recouped] Ford is the only major carmaker breaking out EV numbers by themselves. But other marques likely suffer similar losses. https://www.zerohedge.com/political/fords-120000-loss-vehicle-shows-california-ev-goals-are-impossible Given these facts, how did Tesla ever produce anything in volume let alone profit?
  • AZFelix Let's forego all of this dilly-dallying with autonomous cars and cut right to the chase and the only real solution.
Next