The Right Spec: 2022 Mazda 3

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Believe it or not, people do still actually buy small cars in this country. Yes, there’s a continuing mass exodus for SUVs and crossover-type vehicles but a few level-headed souls remain who choose to open their wallets for an affordable compact machine.

This migration of buyers has pushed several major automakers to put their efforts into this segment In The Bin which, fortunately for us, means the remaining competitors are some good’uns. One of the best? The little Mazda 3.

One’s first selection in this Choose Your Own Adventure is selecting between sedan and hatchback models of the 3. The latter is priced roughly $2,000 higher than its brother, not an insignificant chunk of change at this end of the market. In fact, it represents about a 10 percent hike, as if someone added five grand onto the sticker of a Tahoe. In numbers most shoppers will understand, that’s about $10 extra biweekly.

Still, the hatch’s practicality can’t be denied and it is the better-looking of these fraternal Mazda twins to this author’s jaundiced eyes. Some reviews carped about that massive D-pillar creating a large blind spot and, after having seat time roughly one year ago, this is a valid complaint. But it’s one with which I would be willing to live given the extra cargo capacity and dose of style.

This sets the floor at $22,750 for a Mazda 3 2.5 S entry-level trim. Under the hood is a 2.5-liter, naturally-aspirated engine making 186 horsepower and a like amount of torque. That power is funneled through the front wheels at this price, and the sole transmission option is a six-speed automatic. All-wheel drive (or the manual transmission) doesn’t appear until further up the food chain.

Economies of scale ensure kit like an eight-speaker audio system and infotainment with all the expected gubbins are included in the base car. Even radar-guided cruise control is on board. But remember that giant D-pillar mentioned earlier? Blind-spot monitoring is absent from the S, making those lane changes on the 405 trickier than they need to be. Suddenly, upgrading to the Select trim for an extra $1,350 seems wise. It brings those eyes in the back of yer head (or at least on the tips of the mirrors) plus niceties like dual-zone climate control and leather touchpoints in the interior. There is no change to the powertrain.

Which brings us to the most important question of all: how much for the Turbo? Deploying 250 horsepower and 320 lb-ft of torque through all four wheels in this attractively styled package is a treat that will set you back $31,550 plus destination. A ’22 GTI S is about two grand cheaper, albeit with half the driven wheels, though it undercuts the (also FWD) Veloster N by roughly $1,000.

But if you’re seeking a hatch, not necessarily one that’s hot, the old advice about selecting wine at a restaurant applies: Choose the second least expensive option.

Please note the prices listed here are in American dollars and are currently accurate for base prices exclusive of any fees, taxes, or rebates. Your dealer may (and should) sell for less (obscene market conditions notwithstanding). Keep your foot down, bone up on available rebates, and bargain hard.

[Images: Mazda]

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 40 comments
  • Jeff S Jeff S on Dec 16, 2021

    A $1,000 more for the hatch is not bad especially with the added utility of a hatch. Mazda 3 would be a good choice.

  • YaMoBeThere YaMoBeThere on Dec 16, 2021

    Just bought a turbo hatch, heck of a car, very refined, perfect daily. There is no reason for Mazda to have put this drivetrain in the 3 but I am so glad they did. My plan is to let the wifey drive it until the warranty is up and then build a DIY Mazdaspeed (assuming there is any aftermarket support). Also, I completely agree with another commenter about the stock "Turanza" tires being absolute trash.

  • Wjtinfwb 157k is not insignificant, even for a Honda. A lot would depend on the maintenance records and the environment the car was operated in. Up to date maintenance and updated wear items like brakes, shocks, belts, etc. done recently? Where did those 157k miles accumulate? West Texas on open, smooth roads that are relatively easy on the chassis or Michigan, with bomb crater potholes, snow and salt that take their toll on the underpinnings. That Honda 4 will run forever with decent maintenance but the underneath bits deteriorate on a Honda just like they do on a Chevy.
  • Namesakeone Yes, for two reasons: The idea of a robot making decisions based on algorithms does not seem to be in anyone's best interest, and the thought of trucking companies salivating over using a computer to replace the salary of a human driver means a lot more people in the unemployment lines.
  • Bd2 Powertrain reliability of Boxer engines is always questionable. I'll never understand why Subaru held onto them for so long. Smartstream is a solid engine platform as is the Veracruz 3.8L V6.
  • SPPPP I suppose I am afraid of autonomous cars in a certain sense. I prefer to drive myself when I go places. If I ride as a passenger in another driver's car, I can see if that person looks alert and fit for purpose. If that person seems likely to crash, I can intervene, and attempt to bring them back to attention. If there is no human driver, there will probably be no warning signs of an impending crash.But this is less significant than the over-arching fear of humans using autonomous driving as a tool to disempower and devalue other humans. As each generation "can't be trusted" with more and more things, we seem to be turning more passive and infantile. I fear that it will weaken our society and make it more prone to exploitation from within, and/or conquest from the outside.
  • JMII Based on the human drivers I encounter everyday I'll happily take my chances with a computer at the wheel.The highway driver assist system on my Santa Cruz is great, it can self drive perfectly in about 90% of situations. However that other 10% requires you to be in control and make decisions. I feel this is the problem with an AI driving a car, there are times when due to road construction, weather conditions or other drivers when only a human will know what to do.
Next