Nissan Announces 'Breakthrough' in Carbon Fiber Production

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Once reserved for aircraft and the world’s most expensive sports cars, carbon fiber has been gradually wriggling its way into the mainstream. On Thursday, Nissan announced it had whipped up a method to manufacture carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) more easily and shorten production time by around 80 percent — adding that it planned to take advantage of the material in order to build increasingly lightweight cars.

The manufacturer also suggested the new process will reduce the cost of manufacturing CFRPs, addressing the industry’s favorite excuse for why they don’t use it more often. That said, the financial inconvenience of implementing carbon fiber is really a byproduct of how labor intensive it is. Most parts are laid into molds one layer at a time with the help of an expert and use vacuum pressure to ensure the resin sets evenly, since they can’t be machine pressed. Yet Nissan felt stamping was the way to go with carbon fiber and claims to have figured out how it should be done.

By creating forms with shallow grooves that allow resin to be distributed more evenly throughout the piece, the automaker says it can press out parts with the help of a vacuum system in a repeatable manner. However, materials still have to be carefully laid beforehand, and some trial and error is needed to determine which processes work for each individual component/form.

From Nissan:

While the benefits of carbon fiber have long been known, it’s expensive compared with other materials such as steel. Along with the difficulty in shaping CFRP parts, this has hampered the mass production of automotive components made from the material.

Nissan found a new approach to the existing production method known as compression resin transfer molding. The existing method involves forming carbon fiber into the right shape and setting it in a die with a slight gap between the upper die and the carbon fibers. Resin is then injected into the fiber and left to harden.

Technically, transfer molding isn’t new, but we’ve not seen many automakers trying to make it work for carbon fiber applications. Nissan already noted the shortened production cycle as one of the benefits, but we’d imagine it also requires a little less tedium when it comes to setting unformed layers of material — and a nice level of consistency once the stamping process has been finalized for an individual part.

However, we can’t see this being a huge benefit to the company unless it’s serious about slapping more CFRP into mainstream models. Tooling isn’t cheap and needs to be offset by enough volume to warrant the cost. Molds will also require substantially more maintenance than slathering a few layers of carbon fiber on a stationary mold that has to be slathered with resin and wrapped before being placed in a pressure chamber.

Regardless, Nissan claims the pieces will be quite strong and much quicker to produce. It wants to begin incorporating the parts into the entire lineup starting with B-pillars (and other simple shapes positioned higher on the vehicle) to lower vehicles’ center of mass. Making use of lightweight materials also aids in overall efficiency, and be a minor blessing as emissions regulations become more stringent.

[Image: Nissan]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 6 comments
  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Sep 03, 2020

    How Saturn was able to make car for cheap?

    • See 2 previous
    • Dukeisduke Dukeisduke on Sep 08, 2020

      @LectroByte Yes, and over time (especially here in the South, where heat and UV rays are a thing), they become hard and brittle, so I've seen a few older Saturns with plastic panels that have cracked or shattered. It's pretty handy when you can replace a window regulator *from the outside*. Oof.

  • Dukeisduke Dukeisduke on Sep 08, 2020

    Hopefully this is more durable than their JATCO CVTs.

  • Probert They already have hybrids, but these won't ever be them as they are built on the modular E-GMP skateboard.
  • Justin You guys still looking for that sportbak? I just saw one on the Facebook marketplace in Arizona
  • 28-Cars-Later I cannot remember what happens now, but there are whiteblocks in this period which develop a "tick" like sound which indicates they are toast (maybe head gasket?). Ten or so years ago I looked at an '03 or '04 S60 (I forget why) and I brought my Volvo indy along to tell me if it was worth my time - it ticked and that's when I learned this. This XC90 is probably worth about $300 as it sits, not kidding, and it will cost you conservatively $2500 for an engine swap (all the ones I see on car-part.com have north of 130K miles starting at $1,100 and that's not including freight to a shop, shop labor, other internals to do such as timing belt while engine out etc).
  • 28-Cars-Later Ford reported it lost $132,000 for each of its 10,000 electric vehicles sold in the first quarter of 2024, according to CNN. The sales were down 20 percent from the first quarter of 2023 and would “drag down earnings for the company overall.”The losses include “hundreds of millions being spent on research and development of the next generation of EVs for Ford. Those investments are years away from paying off.” [if they ever are recouped] Ford is the only major carmaker breaking out EV numbers by themselves. But other marques likely suffer similar losses. https://www.zerohedge.com/political/fords-120000-loss-vehicle-shows-california-ev-goals-are-impossible Given these facts, how did Tesla ever produce anything in volume let alone profit?
  • AZFelix Let's forego all of this dilly-dallying with autonomous cars and cut right to the chase and the only real solution.
Next