Aston Martin Teases New Hybrid V6, Promises More Than 715 Horsepower

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

When you think about V6 engines, you’re probably reminded of mainstream family vehicles and manufacturers trying to find a way to package six cylinders in the most efficient manner. Inline sixes are great, but their length makes them difficult to install in the bulk of a manufacturer’s lineup. By splitting the cylinder count into two banks, the V6 avoids this problem — which is why you’ve seen it in everything from minivans to supercars over the last few decades.

Even Aston Martin has decided to tap the configuration for its next generation of vehicles. Developed in-house and intended for hybridization, the automaker promises its new V6 will not only live up to expectations but surpass them by outperforming the mightiest V12 in its stable. That 5.2-liter motor currently belongs to the Aston Martin DBS Superleggera and makes 715 horsepower and 664 lb-ft of torque.

Set to debut in the upcoming Valhalla for 2022, Aston’s new motor is a 3.0-liter V6 codenamed TM01 in memory of long-passed engineer Tadek Marek. Its size is supposed to make it easy to install in an array of vehicles, with the manufacturer stipulating that it could easily slotted into both mid- and front-engined cars. This is the first motor the company has designed itself since 1969, though there are familiarities.

Previously seen on Mercedes-AMG models (which have also found their way into Aston vehicles) the V6 uses a “hot-v” configuration, with the turbos located between the cylinder banks. This helps shrink the powertrain’s overall size (mainly width) and can aid with heat management if designed properly.

Aston Martin pegged the V6’s weight at “less than 200kg,” or about 441 pounds. While not exceptionally lightweight for a V6, the manufacturer appears to be prioritizing packaging versatility and power over weight savings. The unit is also set up for hybridization by design, requiring additional components necessary for syncing up to a battery pack and electric motors. To offset the added heft and make it better suited for track-day shenanigans, Aston is implementing a dry sump system — which carries the added benefit of lowering its center of gravity (by allowing the motor to ride lower than it would with a traditional oil pan). It’s also designed to meet all future emission requirements under Euro 7 rules.

Beyond a few teasers and a handful of photographs of a motor that’s technically still in development, that info is all Aston is willing to provide. There’s a video that could give us a sense of what the unit might sound like (sort of boring, to be honest), though the company has been pretty clear that it will engineer the exhaust to make the sweetest sounds imaginable come production time.

Considering this is the engine that’s supposed to propel the brand into the next extra of motoring, there’s a lot riding on TM01’s success. The factory certainly isn’t taking things lightly; it feels that the mill offers real promise for Aston Martin to be both environmentally conscious and ludicrously powerful.

“Investing in your own powertrains is a tall order, but our team have risen to the challenge,” said Aston Martin President and Group CEO Andy Palmer. “Moving forward, this power unit will be integral to a lot of what we do and the first signs of what this engine will achieve are incredibly promising.”

[Images: Aston Martin]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 11 comments
  • Schmitt trigger Schmitt trigger on Mar 25, 2020

    Definitively, those glowing pipes do look awesome! Heat management in the actual vehicle's compartment will be a tough one, though.

  • NeilM NeilM on Mar 25, 2020

    Seems like a 90 degree vee to me. (A 120 would look almost flat.) Ignore the timing chest covers; they intersect at an intermediate point above the crank axis and therefore fool the eye. The crank is at that big harmonica balancer. Draw a pair of imaginary lines from the crank center to the midpoint between the pairs of cam end covers on each head. Looks like 90 degrees, at least unless they chose some other close, but unusual angle — cf the 65 degree vee angles occasionally encountered. Re heat management, that's a solved problem. There are other hot vee engines in production.

  • Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
  • Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
  • Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
  • NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
  • Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.
Next