Mulling Pickups, Volkswagen Thinks Smaller… and Long-term

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

No one wants to fail, and certainly no one wants to be handed a steep bill for their failure. With that in mind, Volkswagen is leaning towards the smaller of the two potential pickups it’s foisted upon American auto show goers in recent years.

That means you’re far less likely to see a Tanoak at your local dealer, and much more likely to see a Tarok taking its place. Or, equally as likely, you’ll see nothing at all.

This is according to Volkswagen’s vice president of product marketing and strategy, Hein Schafer, who told Autoblog that matching the low production volume of the Honda Ridgeline with an Atlas-based midsizer is not something VW brass have much enthusiasm for.

The development dollars needed to convert the midsize CUV into the longer-wheelbase Tanoak (shown in New York in concept form in 2018) would likely scuttle the project on the drawing board. VW said that same year that significant overseas volume would be necessary to make the project a reality.

It’s no wonder that the automaker then teased the Tarok a year later. Bound for production (and the South American market) at the time, the Tarok is less pickup, more CUV-with-a-bed. A four-foot one, at that. It borrows the Atlas’ MQB platform and retains the CUV’s wheelbase, lowering development costs.

While Schafer said both vehicles garnered considerable enthusiasm from showgoers, the automaker is much more likely to go the smaller route. He also envisions a compact, unibody pickup based on a small CUV bound for America from a Mexican factory, claiming a model like that could attract buyers not interested in larger, midsize pickup offerings. With the Hyundai Santa Cruz on the way and Ford getting into the small truck game, an entry from VW would make sense.

Whatever VW comes up with, it almost certainly won’t arrive soon. Volkswagen of America’s chief operating officer, Johan de Nysschen, unenthusiastically told Motor Trend at last week’s Chicago Auto Show that any such product is at least 5 years out. Even then, he’d prefer to see an EV model based on the company’s MEB electric architecture.

[Image: Volkswagen]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 9 comments
  • Fleuger99 Fleuger99 on Feb 11, 2020

    I think VW is will regret this strong push to go all out EV. I don't think by enlarge the majority of people are ready to go EV. I know I have no plans to buy an EV in the next ten plus years. Technology is still not in a position to produce a product that can replace the current combustion engine from a practical usage perspective. de Nysschen is also killing any decent VW products for North America. Instead they serve a shitty North American only Passat which has been cost cut to the point it isn't even a VW anymore. The same has happened with the ugly 'new' Jetta for North America. What happened to the company that produced exciting and fun to drive vehicles?

    • See 3 previous
    • Gearhead77 Gearhead77 on Feb 14, 2020

      @sgeffe, I agree. The interior in the current Passat and Jetta are definitely lacking compared to my current '17 Golf or my 04' Jetta wagon. Granted, I've not had my current car or the 04 long enough to see how they age, but I bought the 04 used at 3 years old and 35k and my Golf is 2.5 years old. The undeniable goodness of the Golf seems lost on the Jetta and Passat. On a recent trip to the VW dealer for state inspection/emissions, I sat in an Arteon and it was much closer to having the VW feel of my Golf.

  • Gearhead77 Gearhead77 on Feb 14, 2020

    If VW were to bring a small truck sized like the Subaru Baja (the later one, not the early 80's one) I'd trade in my Golf tomorrow. I don't need a truck, but having a small car with a truck bed to haul around bikes or pick-up mulch or other things would be great. Our lease on our Sienna is up soon and we'll likely get an Odyssey, but I really wish VW would bring a van that fits in a garage to the US again. I don't like crossovers in general, but an Atlas based van couldn't be that hard to make could it?

  • Redapple2 Focus and Fiesta are better than Golf? (overall?) I liked the rentals I had. I would pick these over a Malibu even though it was a step down in class and the rental co would not reduce price.
  • Teddyc73 Oh good lord here we go again criticizing Cadillac for alphanumeric names. It's the same old tired ridiculous argument, and it makes absolutely no sense. Explain to me why alphanumeric names are fine for every other luxury brand....except Cadillac. What young well-off buyer is walking around thinking "Wow, Cadillac is a luxury brand but I thought they had interesting names?" No one. Cadillac's designations don't make sense? And other brands do? Come on.
  • Flashindapan Emergency mid year refresh of all Cadillac models by graphing on plastic fenders and making them larger than anything from Stellantis or Ford.
  • Bd2 Eh, the Dollar has held up well against most other currencies and the IRA is actually investing in critical industries, unlike the $6 Trillion in pandemic relief/stimulus which was just a cash giveaway (also rife with fraud).What Matt doesn't mention is that the price of fuel (particularly diesel) is higher relative to the price of oil due to US oil producers exporting records amount of oil and refiners exporting records amount of fuel. US refiners switched more and more production to diesel fuel, which lowers the supply of gas here (inflating prices). But shouldn't that mean low prices for diesel?Nope, as refiners are just exporting the diesel overseas, including to Mexico.
  • Jor65756038 As owner of an Opel Ampera/Chevrolet Volt and a 1979 Chevy Malibu, I will certainly not buy trash like the Bolt or any SUV or crossover. If GM doesn´t offer a sedan, then I will buy german, sweedish, italian, asian, Tesla or whoever offers me a sedan. Not everybody like SUV´s or crossovers or is willing to buy one no matter what.
Next