As Nissan and Infiniti Sales Sink Yet Again, Automaker Continues to Shrink Incentives

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

You have to hand it to Nissan. Despite holding a continually declining share of new-car sales in the U.S., the automaker is sticking to its plan to firm up its financial footing.

That means holding the line on incentives and fleet sales — a practice it once revelled in back when the company pushed volume above all else.

Nissan brand sales fell 3.7 percent, year over year, in October, and the Infiniti brand staged a repeat of a performance we’ve grown used to in 2019. Its sales fell 23 percent last month. Year to date, Nissan volume is down 6 percent, with Infiniti posting a 17.1-percent loss.

Sales started to tumble last year as the automaker, finding itself under increasing financial pressure, pulled a U-turn on its sales strategy. However, new model introductions didn’t fill the void. The redesigned Altima eked out a narrow YoY win last month, but the model — now available with all-wheel drive — is still down compared to this time last year. Infiniti’s new compact QX50 crossover flopped badly after its 2018 introduction; sales of that innovative vehicle fell 53.5 percent in October, with volume down some 20.9 percent since the start of the year.

On a YTD basis, the only vehicles in the Nissan fold to show any buoyancy are the flagship QX80 SUV (up 1.4 percent), the midsize QX60 crossover (up a scant 0.1 percent), and the subcompact Kicks (which has the mathematical benefit of being introduced in June 2018). Overall, Nissan Group sales are off 7 percent through the end of October. Making matters worse, the automaker’s average transaction price fell 1.1 percent last month, compared to a 2.7-percent increase for the industry.

As for incentives, Nissan hasn’t taken off the wet blanket. According to data from ALG, Nissan’s incentive spend per unit was down 3 percent last month, compared to an industry that saw incentive spend rise an average of 4.7 percent. That said, the dollar value of Nissan’s spiffing outranked the industry average ($4,196 versus $3,767). Nissan incentives rose 2.7 percent in September following a 4.9-percent decrease in August.

Leading the pack among incentive increases last month were Fiat Chrysler and General Motors (both up 11 percent) and Honda (up 10 percent).

[Image: Nissan]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 18 comments
  • Sckid213 Sckid213 on Nov 04, 2019

    Does anyone have any theories on why the QX50 is such a flop? I've only seen two here in Los Angeles, and a commenter on another site said he's seeing blowout leases of $299/mo offered in San Diego. The QX50 looks fine (not ugly), interior is actually pretty nice, price is right at $299, Infiniti stores are usually at least a bit "upscale"...does the QX50 drive so poorly that even "normal" people hate the way it drives? Is it because nobody knows of its existence, and when they see an ad while car shopping online, see the bad reviews? I can't figure it out. The QX50 is the posterchild for "just build a crossover and it will sell" not being true all the time.

    • See 2 previous
    • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Nov 04, 2019

      @dal20402 Can you replace Pontiac badge with Mercedes badge and call it a day?

  • Oberkanone Oberkanone on Nov 04, 2019

    Nissan added dealerships. Increased fleet sales. Increased incentives in the most offensive manner to dealerships, the dreaded stairsteps. Dealership profit and loss statements tilted to loss. Dealership valuations plummetted at the same time as Nissan demanded facility investments. So what does Nissan do? Nissan is the most likely to terminate franchise and send default letters. Corporate is not cultivating a happy relationship. Perhaps this will all change for the better. There is a monumental shift in culture in the works at Nissan.

  • 3SpeedAutomatic I'd like to see a sedan:[list][*]boxy in shape, avoid the windshield at a 65º angle BS[/*][*]tall greenhouse, plenty of headroom to sit straight up in the back seat[/*][*]V8, true dual exhaust, sans turbo, gobs of torque[/*][*]rear wheel drive, fully independent suspension, accommodate a stretched wheel base (livery service would go nuts)[/*][*]distinctive, tasteful colors (black, navy blue, claret, etc.)[/*][*]more substance, less flash on dashboard[/*][*]limited 5 yr run, get it while you can before the EPA shuts you down[/*][/list]
  • Bd2 Mark my words : Lexus Deathwatch Part 1, the T24 From Hell!
  • Michael S6 Cadillac is beyond fixing because of lack of investment and uncompetitive products. The division and GM are essentially held afloat by mega size SUV (and pick up truck GM) that only domestic brainwashed population buys. Cadillac only hope was to leapfrog the competition in the luxury EV market but that turned out disastrously with the botches role out of the Lyriq which is now dead on arrival.
  • BlackEldo I'm not sure the entire brand can be fixed, but maybe they should start with the C pillar on the CT5...
  • Bd2 To sum up my comments and follow-up comments here backed by some data, perhaps Cadillac should look to the Genesis formula in order to secure a more competitive position in the market. Indeed, by using bespoke Rwd chassis, powertrains and interiors Genesis is selling neck and neck with Lexus while ATPs are 15 to 35% higher depending on the segment you are looking at. While Lexus can't sell Rwd sedans, Genesis is outpacing them 2.2 to 1. Genesis is an industry world changing success story, frankly Cadillac would be insane to not replicate it for themselves.
Next