BMW M2 Competition to Replace M240iR Customer Racecar

Anthony Magagnoli
by Anthony Magagnoli

BMW has announced a successor to the popular M235i and M240i Racing models in the form of the M2 Competition. While the first cars are slated for delivery in the second quarter of 2020, they will see their first public race test during round 5 of the VLN Endurance Championship at the Nürburgring on August 3rd, 2019.

The “M235i Racing” customer racing model proved to be highly successful in Europe and the U.S. Introduced to the U.S. in 2016, Toby Grahovec drove his Classic BMW M235iR to the Pirelli World Challenge TC class championship that year. Customer orders were fulfilled in the second half of 2016 and I personally raced one in 2017 for Rooster Hall Racing, securing Rookie of the Year honors that season. Now in their 4th year in the U.S., the SRO TC America class is dominated by the M235iR and M240iR models. In the opening round, 14 of the 17 entrants were in the BMWs.

The M235iR has also been popular in BMW CCA Club Racing, as well as several endurance racing series. It is common to find them in organizations such as American Endurance Racing, World Racing League, and Lucky Dog Racing League. Even ChampCar (formerly ChumpCar) has seen M235iR entries. With endurance-spec brakes, a transmission that can’t be “money shifted”, and relatively benign handling, it’s an ideal car for endurance use when dealing with varying drivers.

To follow up on the popularity of the M235iR, BMW will be introducing the M2 Competition as an entry-level customer racing car, based on the M2 Competition road car. BMW’s Customer Racing services will be expanded in the U.S. by building and developing competence centers here. Capable partners will be commissioned to support teams at a local level who have extensive motorsport expertise. I can attest to the importance and value of having reliable factory-backed support for a factory-built race car.

While the M240iR was introduced in 2018 as an evolution of the M235iR, it was little more than some cosmetic upgrades to align with the production road cars. Both cars race alongside each other in TC America.

The M2 Competition road car has a 405hp S55 engine from the M3/M4, 7-speed Dual Clutch Transmission, and Active M differential. The M240i – and its associated Racing version – have the 335hp N55 engine, 8-speed ZF automatic transmission, and standard clutch-type M Performance limited slip differential. The relevant suspension and brake differences between the street cars are changed out for racing, so they are not so important. But clearly, there would be a performance differential between the M2 and M240i if the powertrain and drivetrain are to be carried over.

Being that the M2 Competition racecar is aligned as an entry-level car for professional racing, as well as suitable for club racers, the performance would be expected to align with the current M240iR. The TC America class’ balance of performance is now essentially built around the BMW. It is the baseline that other manufacturer’s cars are adjusted to match. After all, it makes sense to tweak a couple cars here and there as opposed to the vast majority of the field.

The question is, what will happen to all the M235iR and M240iR cars that are currently racing? There does not exist a current classing structure here between the current M240iR and the M4 GT4 for a higher-performance M2 version to fit into.

I see two potential solutions for the U.S. One is that the M2 Competition is a largely-cosmetic “evo” package, like the M240iR update was. This would allow the existing cars to continue competing, even if an update becomes mandatory for the professional SRO TC America series.

The other possibility is that the new M2 racecar is classed into TC America but undergoes a “detuning” process to balance the performance with the M240iR. BMW Group Motorsport Director Jens Marquardt said, “With the new entry-level model — the successor to the BMW M240i Racing — we are… offering our grass-roots customers continuity.”

Continuity would indicate an evolution rather than an outright replacement. I expect that we’ll find out by August 3rd. I’ll be paying attention to this particular VLN race to find out more.

[Images: BMW Group; Halston Pitman]

Anthony Magagnoli
Anthony Magagnoli

Following 10 years in Toyota's Production Engineering division, Anthony spent 3 years as a Vehicle Dynamics Engineer for FCA. From modest beginnings in autocross, he won a NASA SpecE30 National Championship and was the 2017 Pirelli World Challenge TC Rookie of the Year. Aside from being a professional racecar driver, he is a private driving coach and future karaoke champion.

More by Anthony Magagnoli

Comments
Join the conversation
 4 comments
  • SPPPP SPPPP on Jun 25, 2019

    Or just keep all the cars in the same class and let the cheapskates lose until they pony up the cash for the new model?

    • Anthony Magagnoli Anthony Magagnoli on Jun 26, 2019

      Balance of Performance (BoP) will seek to equalize the cars. There are rules on how old a platform can be, but with the 2-series still being on sale, the M235iR won't be phased out any time soon.

  • Theflyersfan Theflyersfan on Jun 26, 2019

    Just an "I'm curious" question - I thought it was very interesting and basically radical for BMW to put the water injection cooling in the M4 GTS to help get all of that extra power out of the engine. I believe BMW was the first in years, if not decades, to put that into a street legal production car. Given you're racing BMWs, and putting those engines through hell, do they provide the water injection in those engines as well, or was that just a one-time only thing with those competition M4 GTS models? Given the new 3-series is on the streets now, and the M3 and M4 should be out in 2020 and 2021 respectively, I wonder if they are going to produce that model again.

    • Anthony Magagnoli Anthony Magagnoli on Jun 26, 2019

      Water Injection is not included in the M4 GT4 for a couple reasons. One is that the tank is heavy and weight is the enemy. The other is that its a BoP class and power is regulated, anyway. There's no need for it. That's a good question. The M4 GTS and M3/M4 CS models were not exactly big sellers. If they bring the models back, I think they'll revise the formula a bit and possibly cut down the price premium some. I think that's what hurt them. Here's a piece I did on the M3 CS for another outlet: https://jalopnik.com/when-lightweighting-goes-too-far-1834280856

  • FreedMike Glad that one worked out for you!
  • Urlik My issue with gigacasting is future repairabilty. It may save in manufacturing but all the savings will get eaten up by the consumers in increased insurance costs.
  • Wjtinfwb Ford can produce all the training and instructional videos they want, and issue whatever mandates they can pursuant to state Franchise laws. The dealer principal and staff are the tip of the spear and if they don't give a damn, the training is a waste of time. Where legal, link CSI and feedback scores to allocations and financial incentives (or penalties). I'm very happy with my Ford products (3 at current) as I was with my Jeeps. But the dealer experience is as maddening and off-putting as possible. I refuse now to spend my money at a retailer who treats me and my investment like trash so I now shop for a dealer who does provide professional and courteous service. That led to the Jeep giving way to an Acura, which has not been trouble free but the dealer is at least courteous and responsive. It's the same owner group as the local Ford dealer so it's not the owners DNA, it's how American Honda manages the dealer interface with American Honda's customer. Ford would do well to adopt the same posture. It's their big, blue oval sign that's out front.
  • ToolGuy Nice car."I’m still on the fill-up from prior to Christmas 2023."• This is how you save the planet (and teach the oil companies a lesson) with an ICE.
  • Scrotie about 4 years ago there was a 1992 oldsmobile toronado which was a travtech-avis pilot car that had the prototype nav system and had a big antenna on the back. it sold quick and id never seen another ever again. i think they wanted like 13500 for it which was steep for an early 90s gm car.
Next