Trade War Watch: New Tariffs Coming Down the Pipe After China Pulls U-turn

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The United States could impose a 25 percent import tariff on $200 billion worth of Chinese goods by the end of this week — the result of threats issued by President Donald Trump following a reported about-face on the part of Chinese officials negotiating a new trade deal with the U.S.

At the core of the dispute? Intellectual property rights, sources claim.

According to Bloomberg, sources with knowledge of the dispute say U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer grew angry after Chinese officials said they would not accept a trade deal that required new changes to Chinese law. This is apparently the opposite of their previous stance.

From Bloomberg:

The change has major implications for provisions of the deal aimed at ending a Chinese practice of forcing U.S. companies seeking to do business in the country to reveal proprietary technologies and other intellectual property.

The U.S. side, led by Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer, thought that issues around what’s known as forced technology transfer were resolved and considered the Chinese position on changing its laws to be an attempt to renegotiate, the people said. Lighthizer was angered by the move and briefed Trump.

While the ongoing Chinese sales slump is cutting into automaker profits, most OEMs still see the country as a barely-tapped market capable of lifting their fortunes during a similar slump in the West. Still, handing over sensitive technology to Chinese partners puts OEMs at risk of losing their competitive advantage, should that technology leak out to rivals. There’s a reason why the U.S. wants China to change its laws.

“Over the course of the last week or so we have seen … an erosion in commitments by China,” Lighthizer told media, as reported by Reuters. “That in our view is unacceptable.”

“We’re not breaking off talks at this point. But for now … come Friday there will be tariffs in place,” he added.

The outlet reports that Chinese Vice Premier Liu He is still expected to travel to Washington on Thursday and Friday for talks. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin backed up Lighthizer’s comments, claiming Chinese officials reneged on a deal the two sides expected to close as early as this week.

“They were trying to go back on language that had been previously negotiated, very clear language, that had the potential of changing the deal dramatically,” Mnuchin said. “The entire economic team … are completely unified and recommended to the president to move forward with tariffs if we are not able to conclude a deal by the end of the week.”

The U.S. first raised import tariffs (from 10 to 25 percent) on Chinese goods last July, hitting certain automakers harder than others. Some domestic OEMs applied for exemptions for vehicles and components ( sorry, Tesla), while others switched production locales to avoid steep sticker prices in the vital U.S. market.

[Image: Ford China]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
14 of 50 comments
  • FreedMike FreedMike on May 07, 2019

    Trade warz iz kool and eazy to win.

    • See 4 previous
    • Lorenzo Lorenzo on May 08, 2019

      Not necessarily. China is a special case in that their economy depends on exports to us and ours has virtually no need for exports to China. The exports China sends us is mostly low-priced junk that can be produced elsewhere for slightly higher prices, and cutting off China's ability to steal American tech (intellectual property) without paying for it benefits American tech developers and our economy. In most other cases, Trump is threatening trade to get better deals than the ones existing, but still have trade. In the case of China, the Chinese are leveraging trade to become a hegemon in Asia and eventually the world, both economically and militarily. The trade war is driving production to other asian countries that are wary of Chinese intentions. The Chinese couldn't have been more ham-fisted in their attempt at world power: see their activity in the South China Sea.

  • Tylanner Tylanner on May 07, 2019

    Trump is certainly good at fighting for the big guy. That will be his legacy...but thankfully it's reversible.

    • See 6 previous
    • JD-Shifty JD-Shifty on May 07, 2019

      @xtoyota "all 20 plus people". LOL were you this upset when we had 20 plus GOP dolts running years ago? Rick Perry...

  • Wolfwagen The last couple of foreign vehicle manufacturers that tried breaking into the U.S. Mainstream Vehicle Market had a very hard time and 1. Couldn't get past the EPA regulation side (Mahindra) or 2. had a substandard product (Vinfast).
  • Midori Mayari I live in a South American country where that is already the case; Chinese brands essentially own the EV market here, and other companies seem unable to crack it even when they offer deep enough discounts that their offerings become cheaper than the Chinese ones (as Renault found when it discounted its cheapest EV to be about 15% cheaper than the BYD Seagull/Dolphin Mini and it still sold almost nothing).What's more, the arrival of the Chinese EVs seem to have turbocharged the EV transition; we went from less than 1% monthly EV market share to about 5% in the span of a year, and it's still growing. And if — as predicted — Chinese EV makers lower their production costs to be lower than those of regular ICE cars in the next few years, they could undercut equivalent ICE car prices with EVs and take most of the car market by storm. After all, a pretty sizeable number of car owners here have a garage where they could charge, and with local fuel and electricity prices charging at home reduces fuel costs by over 80% compared with an ICE car.
  • FreedMike So...Tesla does no marketing except to justify Elon Musk's pay. Mmmmmkay...
  • Daniel J [list=1][*]Would we care if this was Mexico or India? No. The problem is China and it's government.[/*][*]Tariffs are used to some degree to prop up American companies. Yes, things are going to be more expensive, but we already have significant Japanese, S. Korean, and German competition. [/*][*]After years on this website, people still can't wrap their heads around two opposing forces: High Prices and High Wages. Everyone on here is applauding the high wages mandated by unions but complain at the very same time that the cars aren't cheaper. No amount of corporate pay slashing will give you both. "Oh, but I could run the company better". GFL. Go start your own company.[/*][/list=1]
  • SCE to AUX Sports teams pay mediocre players millions, and great players tens of millions. Same thing in the movie industry.People object to these figures, but then line up to buy tickets.I don't see a difference here. The Tesla BoD wouldn't try this outrage if the company was doing poorly. However, consumers might recoil when they hear about it - or not.
Next