Let's Talk About Six: Mazda Confirms New Inline Engine in Development

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Much of the news surrounding Mazda this past year has concerned powerplants: a new turbocharged 2.5-liter four-banger for the CX-5 crossover and 6 sedan, a sort-of sparkless Skyactiv-X mill that still doesn’t have a North American arrival date, a lackluster diesel that took its sweet time getting here, and the brand’s continued lack of electric offerings.

The engine news continues. Buried within this week’s fiscal year earnings report is a hint of two new engines to come — inline-six engines. For a brand eager to position itself as premium, the development of a mill widely regarded as the classiest engine type reflects well on it.

It looks like Jalopnik was first to delve into the center of the document, so credit where it’s due.

On page 25 of the 57-page doc, Mazda details its investments for “brand value improvement.” There, beneath the subheading of “large architecture,” the automaker lists a straight-six Skyactiv-X engine and a straight-six Skyactiv-D diesel engine, both with longitudinal layouts and ability to handle all-wheel drive applications.

A 48-volt mild hybrid and plug-in hybrid are also listed as future large vehicle offerings, while mild hybrids and independently-developed EVs are in the cards for the smaller crowd.

Anyone who’s watched the European auto scene over the past few years has no doubt noticed a resurgence in inline-six interest. BMW never got rid of its inline units, and now Mercedes-Benz and Jaguar Land Rover are getting into the game. Why not Mazda? The company isn’t exactly awash in larger-displacement engines.

The document doesn’t state when we can expect to see either of these new inline engines, though the Skyactiv-X designation implies power and fuel economy at least on par with the most advanced offerings from Europe. We expect to see it offered in an America-geared global crossover slated for production in 2021 at the jointly-operated Mazda/Toyota Alabama assembly plant. (The plant is not yet built.)

As stated before, Skyactiv-X offers drivers a different way to light their fire. Its nearly diesel-like compression ratio is the product of a unique combustion process.

From Mazda:

Running on regular gasoline, SPCCI works by compressing the fuel-air mix at a much higher compression ratio, with a very lean mix. The SKYACTIV-X engine uses a spark to ignite only a small, dense amount of the fuel-air mix in the cylinder. This raises the temperature and pressure so that the remaining fuel-air mix ignites under pressure (like a diesel), burning faster and more completely than in conventional engines.

Besides the engine news, Mazda’s earnings report shows a sales softening. Globally, the brand’s sales sank 4 percent, the result of weakness in the U.S. and Chinese markets. On the fiscal side of things, lowered sales volume and unfavorable exchange rates pushed operating profit down 43 percent for the year.

The company expects to make up for last year’s volume loss with this year’s release of the next-generation Mazda 3 and the tweener CX-30 crossover.

[Images: © Chris Tonn/TTAC]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 52 comments
  • Lastwgn Lastwgn on May 10, 2019

    Wouldn't it be interesting if the inline six is dropped into an updated Mazda pickup for the North American market? That could complete a fully rounded out product lineup.

  • WildcatMatt WildcatMatt on May 10, 2019

    "That's a neat car she's washing. You think that's a straight six?"

  • Slavuta CX5 hands down. Only trunk space, where RAV4 is better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Oof 😣 for Tesla.https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-05-03-nhtsa-probes-tesla-recall-over-autopilot-concerns.html
  • Slavuta Autonomous cars can be used by terrorists.
  • W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
Next