New Three-row Jeep Probably Won't Carry the Grand Cherokee Name

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

In its big February plant and product announcement, Fiat Chrysler said its Mack Avenue engine facility will give way to SUV production, describing the first vehicle to emerge from the repurposed plant as a “three-row, full-size Jeep SUV.” Given that the next-generation Grand Cherokee will also call the plant home, and that the two models will almost certainly share underpinnings, one would assume the three-row Jeep would carry a modified GC nameplate. Think Hyundai Santa Fe XL.

That’s been the assumption, anyway. However, the automaker’s CEO suggests a wholly new nameplate is in the works.

Speaking to Britain’s Auto Express, Mike Manley said the upcoming three-row Jeep is referred to in vague terms for a reason. He also admits the Grand Cherokee, in its current form, has limitations.

The new model “will technically play in the same segment as Grand Cherokee,” Manley said, adding that, “Roughly 60% of that segment is three row, so Grand Cherokee has really only played in 40%. That will open up that part of the segment for us.”

Why not just add a size-related suffix to the Grand Cherokee name? It could still happen, Manley suggests, though he’ll be pushing for an alternative.

“We’ll have the choice of Grand Cherokee or a different model,” he said. “For me, the Grand Cherokee is such an icon, so that’s why I talk about [the new model] as a three row Jeep. It’s like if I dramatically changed what Wrangler looked like – I’d be crucified! Grand Cherokee, interestingly, has a customer base that loves it because it’s got rear-wheel drive, well-positioned stance, and dimensionally it’s perfect.”

It remains to be seen just how much the new model differs, style-wise, from the Grand Cherokee. By the sounds of it, the new model will not simply be a carbon copy of the Grand Cherokee from the C-pillar forward, though the two models are expected to share the same architecture. It’s believed that an updated and beefed-up version of the Giorgio platform, found beneath the Alfa Romeo Giulia and Stelvio, will serve as the models’ starting point.

Whatever name FCA decides to bestow on the new model, customers will see the first units roll out of Mack Avenue in late 2020, with the next-gen Grand Cherokee coming along in the first half of 2021. (FCA’s Jefferson North facility will also build the GC.) In creating the new model, FCA will fill a lucrative white space between the two-row GC and the upcoming, big-bucks Wagoneer and Grand Wagoneer. Those brutes go into production at Warren Truck in early 2021.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
9 of 39 comments
  • Turbosasquatch Turbosasquatch on Mar 11, 2019

    I thought it was confirmed that it will be the Grand Commander. Same thing they sell in China https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeep_Grand_Commander

    • See 1 previous
    • Turbosasquatch Turbosasquatch on Mar 12, 2019

      @Steve203 Ah, I couldn't remember if it was Cherokee or Grand Cherokee based. The three row definitely needs a new name as another "Cherokee" would confuse some people, especially if they do bring over the 3 row Cherokee as well. I vote Comanche and Grand Comanche. Stays in the same vein as Cherokee but represents the 3 rows. They already named the truck the Gladiator anyways

  • Steve203 Steve203 on Mar 12, 2019

    I pondered their dilemma a while back. The Chrysler nomenclature for minivans was the short wheelbase version was the Caravan/Voyager while the long wheelbase version was the "Grand" Caravan/Voyager. They messed that up with the non-grand Cherokee an entirely different vehicle than the Grand Cherokee. So what to call a grander Grand Cherokee? It occurred to me to have a different family name for 3 row SUVs, so a 3 row non-grand Cherokee could be the Commander, without the Chinese market "grand", so then the 3 row Grand Cherokee could be the Grand Commander. But that starts to fall apart when a 2 row Wagoneer is a non-grand Wagoneer while the 3 row is the Grand Wagoneer. I considered making the 3 row Grand Cherokee the Wagoneer, and the BoF 3 row monster the Grand Wagoneer, but the sales volume of a car that pushes $100K is going to be so small they would struggle to amortize the investment in it. So, the Waggy and Grand Waggy sort of need to be variations on the same platform. There are plenty of other names in the Jeep archives: Patriot, Liberty, Chief, Comanche, Laredo. Make the 3 row Compass the Patriot, the 3 row non-grand Cherokee the Liberty, make the 3 row Grand Cherokee the Cherokee Chief?

    • See 4 previous
    • Steve203 Steve203 on Mar 12, 2019

      @danio3834 "We’re going to find out. Grand Cherokee and Durango sales are limited by the capacity of the plant they share, " I remember Marchionne complaining, several years ago, that he wanted to introduce the GC to more markets, but he couldn't get enough of them out of JNAP. The conversion of Mack Engine to a second assembly plant will address that issue. There is one nagging thought in the back of my mind: if they bless us with the 3 row non-grand Cherokee, whatever they call it, below the GC and the Waggy and Grand Waggy above the GC, will these additional models cannibalize the GC enough to make Mack Assembly redundant? Of course, the Grand Commander is exactly the right size to replace the Journey. Dropping the Journey would free production capacity at Toluca to build more Compasses and the upcoming 3 row Compass derivative. I added up US Compass and Journey sales, plus European sales of the Compass, which is also built in Toluca, and got well over 300,000 units last year. Toluca is a small plant. They must be losing their mind building that many. FCA was going to add the Compass for Europe to the production slate at the plant in Italy that already builds the Renegade and 500X, which would reduce the load on Toluca, but Manley started to walk that plan back several weeks ago.

  • Redapple2 4 Keys to a Safe, Modern, Prosperous Society1 Cheap Energy2 Meritocracy. The best person gets the job. Regardless.3 Free Speech. Fair and strong press.4 Law and Order. Do a crime. Get punished.One large group is damaging the above 4. The other party holds them as key. You are Iran or Zimbabwe without them.
  • Alan Where's Earnest? TX? NM? AR? Must be a new Tesla plant the Earnest plant.
  • Alan Change will occur and a sloppy transition to a more environmentally friendly society will occur. There will be plenty of screaming and kicking in the process.I don't know why certain individuals keep on touting that what is put forward will occur. It's all talk and BS, but the transition will occur eventually.This conversation is no different to union demands, does the union always get what they want, or a portion of their demands? Green ideas will be put forward to discuss and debate and an outcome will be had.Hydrogen is the only logical form of renewable energy to power transport in the future. Why? Like oil the materials to manufacture batteries is limited.
  • Alan As the established auto manufacturers become better at producing EVs I think Tesla will lay off more workers.In 2019 Tesla held 81% of the US EV market. 2023 it has dwindled to 54% of the US market. If this trend continues Tesla will definitely downsize more.There is one thing that the established auto manufacturers do better than Tesla. That is generate new models. Tesla seems unable to refresh its lineup quick enough against competition. Sort of like why did Sears go broke? Sears was the mail order king, one would think it would of been easier to transition to online sales. Sears couldn't adapt to on line shopping competitively, so Amazon killed it.
  • Alan I wonder if China has Great Wall condos?
Next