Ace of Base: 2019 Kia Stinger 2.0L

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

This is an interesting one. The Stinger is new territory for Kia, venturing into the sporty sedan marketplace generally inhabited by ze Germans and perhaps a few other fringe players. Certainly, in a world where the general public thirsts for crossovers and SUVs, it’ll never be the brand’s top seller.

Hasn’t stopped them from trying, though, and for this I applaud their efforts. Kia decided to give Stinger shoppers a choice of engines, allowing the base model to plunge into the low-$30,000 range. Is it worth a look? Or should one simply upgrade to the tasty 3.3-liter twin-turbo?

Having driven both, there’s no doubt in my mind the bigger mill is a lot more fun. An extra 110 horsepower has that effect, you know. Still, 255 hp in a car tipping the scales at about 3,600 lbs isn’t exactly pokey. For comparison, it should be noted a four-cylinder Camry XSE weighs only about 200 lbs less but makes 50 fewer horses.

For the sum of $32,900, the base 2.0L spec comes with that forced induction inline-four hooked to an eight-speed automatic endowed with paddle shifters. More importantly, that little mill makes 260 lb-ft of twist at a barely-off-idle 1,400 rpm, giving the four-banger Stinger a sprightly feel around town.

Its rear-drive manners play well with enthusiastic driving, although any attempt to race Tran for slips should be left to the twin-turbo V6. It’s a good looking car, even in its base trim, with projector headlamps and LED running lights. Chrome spears dash along the side of the Stinger like flights on a dart while the 18-inch wheels give the impression you spent more money than you actually did. Micro Blue Pearl shown here is a no-charge color.

Your humble author, a human measuring 6’6” in his size 13 stocking feet, has always found it a challenge to enter and exit the Stinger, thanks to a narrow driver’s door opening, a low roofline, and seats that are more heavily bolstered than the average bear. This was the first car in ages in which I hammered my noggin upon entry.

Once inside, though, the Kia cabin is more than welcoming, featuring a large touchscreen (7-inches in the base car) housing Android Auto and Apple CarPlay. Select your level of aggo through the dashboard menu, cycling through five drive modes from Eco to Sport. Dual-zone climate control and a raft of charging points keep all hands happy. The base spec chairs are trimmed in leather, adjusting 12 ways for the driver.

Is the 365 hp 3.3L twin-turbo car with its launch control a better engine? You bet it is. At a savings of $6,200, however, the base Stinger is a compelling package. It might not be an Ace of Base winner compared to the other trims in its lineup, but it’s still a damn good sedan. With the way buyer’s tastes are going, we may not see many more of ‘em. Appreciate them while you can.

[Images: Kia Motors]

Not every base model has aced it. The ones that have? They help make the automotive landscape a lot better. Any others you can think of, B&B? Let us know in the comments. Naturally, feel free to eviscerate our selections.

The model above is shown with American options absent of destination or discounts and is priced in Freedom Dollars. As always, your dealer may sell for less.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 53 comments
  • Bd2 Bd2 on Oct 11, 2018

    Kia is probably pretty pleased w/ sales of the GT (demand for the GT is stronger than they anticipated); the 2.0T, otoh, hasn't exactly been running off the lots. The 2.0T getting replaced by the 2.5T (300 HP), however, should boost sales of the base engine trims.

  • Sportyaccordy Sportyaccordy on Oct 11, 2018

    Just too many things working against it for me. The Germans are faster and get better gas mileage while not being much smaller inside. It looks an awful lot like my '13 Optima. And IIRC it has no LSD.

    • See 3 previous
    • Bd2 Bd2 on Oct 11, 2018

      Only part that looks like the '13 Optima is the greenhouse (front and rear fascias are completely different). And the greenhouse of the current Optima is not nearly as sleek.

  • Oberkanone How long do I have to stay in this job before I get a golden parachute?I'd lower the price of the V-Series models. Improve the quality of interiors across the entire line. I'd add a sedan larger then CT5. I'd require a financial review of Celestiq. If it's not a profit center it's gone. Styling updates in the vision of the XLR to existing models. 2+2 sports coupe woutd be added. Performance in the class of AMG GT and Porsche 911 at a price just under $100k. EV models would NOT be subsidized by ICE revenue.
  • NJRide Let Cadillac be Cadillac, but in the context of 2024. As a new XT5 owner (the Emerald Green got me to buy an old design) I would have happy preferred a Lyriq hybrid. Some who really like the Lyriq's package but don't want an EV will buy another model. Most will go elsewhere. I love the V6 and good but easy to use infotainment. But I know my next car will probably be more electrified w more tech.I don't think anyone is confusing my car for a Blazer but i agree the XT6 is too derivative. Frankly the Enclave looks more prestigious. The Escalade still has got it, though I would love to see the ESV make a comeback. I still think GM missed the boat by not making a Colorado based mini-Blazer and Escalade. I don't get the 2 sedans. I feel a slightly larger and more distinctly Cadillac sedan would sell better. They also need to advertise beyond the Lyriq. I don't feel other luxury players are exactly hitting it out of the park right now so a strengthened Cadillac could regain share.
  • CM Korecko Cadillacs traditionally have been opulent, brash and leaders in the field; the "Standard of the World".That said, here's how to fix the brand:[list=1][*]Forget German luxury cars ever existed.[/*][*]Get rid of the astromech droid names and bring back Seville, Deville, Eldorado, Fleetwood and Brougham.[/*][*]End the electric crap altogether and make huge, gas guzzling land yachts for the significant portion of the population that would fight for a chance to buy one.[/*][*]Stop making sports cars and make true luxury cars for those of us who don't give a damn about the environment and are willing to swim upstream to get what we really want.[/*][*]Stop messing around with technology and make well-made and luxurious interiors.[/*][*]Watch sales skyrocket as a truly different product distinguishes itself to the delight of the target market and the damnation of the Sierra Club. Hell, there is no such thing as bad publicity and the "bad guy" image would actually have a lot of appeal.[/*][/list=1]
  • FreedMike Not surprisingly, I have some ideas. What Cadillac needs, I think, is a statement. They don’t really have an identity. They’re trying a statement car with the Celestiq, and while that’s the right idea, it has the wrong styling and a really wrong price tag. So, here’s a first step: instead of a sedan, do a huge, fast, capable and ridiculously smooth and quiet electric touring coupe. If you want an example of what I’m thinking of, check out the magnificent Rolls-Royce Spectre. But this Cadillac coupe would be uniquely American, it’d be named “Eldorado,” and it’d be a lot cheaper than the $450,000 Spectre – call it a buck twenty-five, with a range of bespoke options for prospective buyers that would make each one somewhat unique. Make it 220 inches long, on the same platform as the Celestiq, give it retro ‘60s styling (or you could do a ‘50s or ‘70s throwback, I suppose), and at least 700 horsepower, standard. Why electric? It’s the ultimate throwback to ‘60s powertrains: effortlessly fast, smooth, and quiet, but with a ton more horsepower. It’s the perfect drivetrain for a dignified touring coupe. In fact, I’d skip any mention of environmental responsibility in this car’s marketing – sell it on how it drives, period.  How many would they sell? Not many. But the point of the exercise is to do something that will turn heads and show people what this brand can do.  Second step: give the lineup a mix of electric and gas models, and make Cadillac gas engines bespoke to the brand. If they need to use generic GM engine designs, fine – take those engines and massage them thoroughly into something special to Cadillac, with specific tuning and output. No Cadillac should leave the factory with an engine straight out of a Malibu or a four-banger Silverado. Third step: a complete line-wide interior redo. Stop the cheapness that’s all over the current sedans and crossovers. Just stop it. Use the Lyriq as a blueprint – it’s a big improvement over the current crop and a good first step. I’d also say Cadillac has a good blend of screen-controlled and switch-controlled user interfaces; don’t give into the haptic-touch and wall-to-wall screen thing. (On the subject of Caddy interiors – as much as I bag on the Celestiq, check out the interior on that thing. Wow.)Fourth step: Blackwing All The Things – some gas, others electric. And keep the electric/gas mix so buyers have a choice.Fifth step: be patient. That’s not easy, but if they’re doing a brand reset, it’ll take time. 
  • NJRide So if GM was serious about selling this why no updates for so long? Or make something truly unique instead of something that looked like a downmarket Altima?
Next