Ace of Base: 2019 Ford Fusion S

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

When the current-generation Fusion appeared for 2013, its Aston Martin styling was a cold glass of water in the face of milquetoast midsized family sedans. Part of Alan Mulally’s “One Ford” plan, the stylish car added zest to a bland segment.

Now, with recently minted CEO Jim Hackett having decreed the Mustang to be Ford’s only car worth keeping, the Fusion has been left to weather crushing competition from competitors that have undergone significant renewals – twice, in some cases.

In creating the Fusion, the Head of Advanced Design for Ford of Europe was commissioned as lead designer. Based in Detroit, under the guise of Exterior Chief Designer for Ford/Lincoln, his team received support from Ford of Europe studios in Germany and the UK. It is highly unlikely this would fly in today’s climate under the ministrations of Hackett.

Nowhere is the shift in thinking more evident than on the 11th floor of Ford HQ. According to a story in the Wall Street Journal, a plaque dedicated to Mr. Mulally’s One Ford plan was removed from the executive’s main conference room several months after the new CEO’s arrival. This was done to clear the wall for use as a workspace to map out a new strategy. Hackett apparently said he didn’t feel the language “fit what we were trying to get across.” The plaque has been re-appointed in a common area on the same floor, a Ford spox explained. Hmm.

For now, the Fusion lives on. How much longer is up for debate. The base model for 2019 is, as in past years, simply called the S. Powered by the company’s 2.5-liter Duratec inline-four that’s been around in some form or another seemingly since the last millennium, drivers will find 175 horsepower and an equal amount of torque. A six-speed automatic is the only transmission option.

Ford includes its Co-Pilot360 suite of safety features on the $22,840 base model Fusion. This packages lane keeping, pre-collision assist, blind-spot monitoring, and a rear-view camera. Adding to the safety net is the MyKey tech which allows parents to annoy teenage drivers by putting restrictions on speed and even radio volume. My parents simply had to rely on reports from nosy neighbors.

Outside, el cheapo 16-inch steel wheels with silver-painted plastic covers wear 215/60R16 tires. Natty LED taillamps adorn the rear. Color-keyed door handles and side-view mirrors won’t bely your thrifty ways. Fog lights don’t appear until the Titanium trim, four rungs up the ladder. The hue shown here is tasty Velocity Blue, a $0 option. I still believe this is a good looking car.

Buttons for the manual climate control reside on the dashboard, along with a couple of power points for accessories. The steering wheel tilts and telescopes while housing switches for the cruise and redundant audio controls. It’s pretty standard fare but a solid feature list. Sync3 is optional. My main gripe? The interior is only available in beige Medium Light Stone, a shade good for deflecting heat in hot climates but offensive to this author’s jaundiced eye.

Like so many other Blue Oval sedans before it, Lincoln LS and fourth-gen Taurus to name just two, it appears the company is content to let a once-great car wither on the vine until it is put out to pasture. Sure, all hands are hot for SUVs, but surely there remains a place at the table for the American sedan – even base models.

Right?

[Images: Ford Motor Company]

Not every base model has aced it. The ones which have? They help make the automotive landscape a lot better. Any others you can think of, B&B? Let us know in the comments. Naturally, feel free to eviscerate our selection.

The model above is shown in American dollars with American options and trim, absent of destination charges and available rebates. As always, your dealer may sell for less.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 88 comments
  • WallMeerkat WallMeerkat on Sep 06, 2018

    Ford Europe assisted as this was the replacement for the Mondeo (which in 1st gen form was brought to the US as the Contour). That's why the side profile looks very similar to the previous gen Mondeo. I have to say, I was sitting at lights earlier opposite a euro Mondeo (this Fusion) that had those Audi style moving indicator LEDs, it looked high spec (Vignale?), really looked nice. Sadly it looks like when the Fusion goes the Mondeo will follow, even Europeans are falling for the CUV fashion.

  • MiataReallyIsTheAnswer MiataReallyIsTheAnswer on Nov 17, 2018

    I had a 2016 Fusion SE loaner last week. It said EcoBoost on the back but under the hood had no displacement on a decal like every single other car I have ever seen. Had to be the 1.5L though, because it was a total dog. There was also a very odd "bulge" below the accelerator that only let you push a very small amount on the gas - like barely push it. To really gas it you had to lift up your foot and like, jab at it with your toes - craziest design I ever saw, and made me darn certain I could never DD one. And that bizcard-size backup cam! Why even bother with such a worthless joke of a tiny screen! I got back in my Charger R/T and the backup cam is like being front row at a drive in. Come on Ford.......

  • W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
Next