Charles Morgan Was Apparently Fired For Telling The Truth: Morgan 3 Wheeler Indeed To Be Upgraded

Ronnie Schreiber
by Ronnie Schreiber

When word started leaking that Charles Morgan had been fired by the family owned traditional British sports car maker, one of the reasons given was that Mr. Morgan had, in an unauthorized manner, told a group of Morgan owners that an improved version of the 3 Wheeler would be launched.

Few things are more traditional in the automobile business than “we can’t discuss future product plans” because no matter what’s in the pipeline, you don’t want to do anything to discourage potential customers from buying what is currently in the showrooms. Now it turns out that if Charles Morgan had indeed told a Morgan owners group that the 3 Wheeler was to be upgraded, he was telling them the truth. Over the weekend at the Motorcycle Live show in the UK, Morgan 3 Wheeler Ltd., the company subsidiary that markets the Mog reverse trike, introduced the first major revision of the 3 Wheeler since Morgan bought the rights to Ace Cycle Car’s spaceframe replica of the original 3 Wheeler and put it into production in 2011. Since then, the company says that it has delivered 1,000 3 Wheelers. That’s a large enough sample to get user feedback from and Morgan has responded with a number of significant changes to the vehicle.

The spaceframe has been upgraded for better torsional stiffness and improved handling, the center drive unit is said to be more durable, the bevel box that drives the back wheel has been isolated to improve NVH, and changes have been made to the steering geometry and relatively primitive front suspension to eliminate bump steer and improve high speed stability. On the outside, new colors and graphics are offered and and the body is now vented for driver and passenger comfort. Cooling of the air-cooled S&S V-twin that powers the 3 Wheeler also gets attention with an optional Urban Cooling Pack.

Ronnie Schreiber
Ronnie Schreiber

Ronnie Schreiber edits Cars In Depth, the original 3D car site.

More by Ronnie Schreiber

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 16 comments
  • That must have been a real dilemma sacking the cars name sake!!

    • Juicy sushi Juicy sushi on Nov 28, 2013

      Other Morgans still own the thing just as much as Charles. They just don't have a Morgan up front for PR purposes.

  • 87 Morgan 87 Morgan on Nov 28, 2013

    I suppose I would agree if we were talking about a mainstream auto builder regarding revealing future product. As my wife calls them/me 'Morgan Dorks' tend to overlook the shortcomings of their car knowing the next version will be better than the next. Similar with most autos, only slower with the updates at Morgan. They essentially brought the same. Are to the U.S. From the 70's through 2003 which was the last year for the +8, I believe. As a tradionalist I find that what makes Morgan so neat is the family heritage behind it. If they are going to move to more of a, for lack of a better term, Ferrari type Co. Then they need to bring better product to market with less quirks that people are willing to forgive. Which, they can't do in reality.

  • ChristianWimmer I have two problems with autonomous cars.One, I LOVE and ENJOY DRIVING. It’s a fun and pleasurable experience for me. I want to drive my cars, not be driven by them.Two, if autonomous cars have been engineered to a standard where they work 100% flawlessly and don’t cause accidents, then freedom-hating governments like the POS European Union or totally idiotic current German government can literally make laws which ban private car ownership in their quest to save the world from climate change bla bla bla…
  • SCE to AUX Everything in me says 'no', but the price is tempting, and it's only 2 hours from me.I guess 123k miles in 18 years does qualify as 'low miles'.
  • Dwford Will we ever actually have autonomous vehicles? Right now we have limited consumer grade systems that require constant human attention, or we have commercial grade systems that still rely on remote operators and teams of chase vehicles. Aside from Tesla's FSD, all these systems work only in certain cities or highway routes. A common problem still remains: the system's ability to see and react correctly to obstacles. Until that is solved, count me out. Yes, I could also react incorrectly, but at least the is me taking my fate into my own hands, instead of me screaming in terror as the autonomous vehicles rams me into a parked semi
  • Sayahh I do not know how my car will respond to the trolley problem, but I will be held liable whatever it chooses to do or not do. When technology has reached Star Trek's Data's level of intelligence, I will trust it, so long as it has a moral/ethic/empathy chip/subroutine; I would not trust his brother Lore driving/controlling my car. Until then, I will drive it myself until I no longer can, at which time I will call a friend, a cab or a ride-share service.
  • Daniel J Cx-5 lol. It's why we have one. I love hybrids but the engine in the RAV4 is just loud and obnoxious when it fires up.
Next