Hammer Time: The Steenkin' Lincoln

Steven Lang
by Steven Lang

You know a car is in trouble when it’s owned by cats. This once proud luxury car had fallen into a rancid feline funk. Cats sunbathing on the roof. Scratch marks on the outside vinyl that had gone from small rivlets to rippling rapids. Even a few dozen tears in the seats from my girlfriends five siblings. The headliner could have easily turned into a canopy plaything for the cats. But thankfully the doors were kept closed at all times. No pee smells in here! In sum, it was redneck car-chitecture that had been forgotten in a rural Georgia driveway somewhere between civilization and Deliverance. The ‘extra’ family car that would prove to be my girlfrined’s future transportation for the next three years.

I would like to say that I replaced all the fluids and hoses. But the truth is I just used the following tools. Battery, gas, duct tape, thumbtacks and a staple gun. The 302 engine started right up once the battery was removed. My wife thumbtacked the headliner while I concentrated on keeping the interior door panels attached with ‘God’s scotch tape’. After a solid seven minutes of interior reconditioning, we started it up and headed to downtown Stone Mountain, Georgia.

A few miles down the road and I smelled something strange. Oil? Gas? Nope. The car battery. It was leaking acid all around the passenger floor. My future wife rode Indian style for the rest of the journey back to the house where I borrowed some baking soda in a futile attempt to clean out the carpet.

Eventually we cut it all out and put a bathrug on top of it. Then we needed a radio. Junkyard? Naaahhh. A $20 boom box from a yard sale was perfectly fine. That was it. The air, radio, power windows, door locks, seats, mirrors, CB radio and even the antenna didn’t work. Apparently 1983 wasn’t one of Detroit’s best years.

What did? The steering wheel, brakes and engine. Oh, and the trip computer worked. That was an amazing thing to behold. One button and it would tell you all the things that were going wrong on the vehicle. A list of wants that would even make Santa Claus sigh in disbelief.

On the road it was pure beater. But safe… and blazingly fast given the driver. Everyone in my wife’s family had lead feet and at 21, my better half saw stop signs and speed limits as mere offhand suggestions. She would take it to her job at a TV station in downtown Atlanta going 85 the whole way on the left hand lane. The car in front of her would see a vehicle the size of Thor bonking up and down, with the headlight covers in half-closed mode… and naturally assume that the driver had to be heavily involved in inner-city pharmaceuticals. Even SUV drivers were afraid of her car. I couldn’t blame them.

Eventually I found a junkyard with the parts we needed. Then two. Then three. After a tune-up the mileage shot up to an amazing 16.5 mpg and the vehicle found it’s mechanical groove. Other than gas it was low-cost. I don’t recall a single thing we had to do to it other than the constant onslaught of leaking fluids.. Let’s face it. The thing ‘drooled’ and by the time I saw multiple puddles on the driveway on a daily basis, I knew it was on borrowed.time .

Like any beater, it was not always loved. When we got a house in the ‘burbs, the Steenkin Lincoln was egged by an unadoring teenager. A visit to the offender’s home with my thick New Jersey accent and gritted teeth yielded the only car wash the vehicle would ever have with us. It served one other function. Sympathy. A young nouveau-riche doctor from Emory decided to unload his ten year old Camry for $500 thanks in great part to the Lincoln’s beatitude.

The very day her mom gave us the title to the Mark VI was the day that vehicle died. We were coming back from an auction (where else?) when the Mark’s computer suddenly read ‘Low Oil Pressure’ followed by automotive castanets. 224,857 miles R.I.P. I loved her so much that eventually we bought another 1983 Lincoln Mark VI. A two door cream-puff which would endure the ages. That one would soon be known as ‘The Blingin’ Lincoln’.

Steven Lang
Steven Lang

More by Steven Lang

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 13 comments
  • Civarlo Civarlo on Sep 21, 2010

    Positively pimplicious!! What's sad is that in a few years that machine will probably end up in an American ghetto somewhere mutilated with 22-23-inch rims and a sound system that will boom and rattle the body panels off.

  • Obbop Obbop on Sep 21, 2010

    "The thing ‘drooled’" Akin to raising minihumans once you train the drooling heathen how to spit things are much less messier.

  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
  • FreedMike If Dodge were smart - and I don't think they are - they'd spend their money refreshing and reworking the Durango (which I think is entering model year 3,221), versus going down the same "stuff 'em full of motor and give 'em cool new paint options" path. That's the approach they used with the Charger and Challenger, and both those models are dead. The Durango is still a strong product in a strong market; why not keep it fresher?
Next