Korea Accuses China Of Spying, Arrests Koreans

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

A very strange spy scandal is brewing between (South) Korea and China. Acting on a tip of the (South) Korean National Intelligence Service (the Korean equivalent of the CIA and FBI rolled into one,) Korean state prosecutors accused China’s SAIC of stealing sensitive state secrets from Korea.

Then, they indicted seven senior Korean engineers at Korea’s Ssangyong on charges of leaking technology essential to develop hybrid cars.

According to Korea Times, the prosecutors said they had no plans to take legal action against SAIC. SAIC had taken over a 48.9-percent stake in Ssangyong in January 2005. When Ssangyong hit a bumpy road beginning this year, SAIC refused to bail them out. The company went bankrupt, and a two month bloody war erupted between laid-off workers and police.

In June 2004, Ssangyong Motor developed a “Hybrid Control Unit” (HCU) together with the German company FEV. The Korean government provided nearly half of the funds needed for the development. This provides the legal grounds the prosecution used to state that Ssangyong’s transfer of subsidized homegrown technologies was done without state permission.

It is alleged that SAIC pressured Ssangyong engineers involved in the development.
According to the prosecutors, the seven accused succumbed and gave the technology to SAIC without state permission in July 2006. The accused received no money for the information, they did what they were told.

At the beginning of the investigation, Ssangyong denied the allegation. The scandal culminated in claims that SAIC had taken over the debt-ridden Korean company to “steal” expensive technologies Ssangyong had developed, “and then threw the company away.” One would think there are cheaper ways of getting the hard and software of a microcontroller than buying the shares of a company and then taking it bankrupt. But what does one know.


Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
 2 comments
  • Don1967 Don1967 on Nov 13, 2009

    If anyone can acquire an ownership interest in a publicly-traded company, how can that company's technology be considered a "state secret"? I see a potential case of patent infringement here, but hardly espionage.

    • Charly Charly on Nov 13, 2009

      The patriot rocket is made by a publicly-traded company so according to you it is not a state secret

  • Dave Holzman My '08 Civic (stick, 159k on the clock) is my favorite car that I've ever owned. If I had to choose between the current Civic and Corolla, I'd test drive 'em (with stick), and see how they felt. But I'd be approaching this choice partial to the Civic. I would not want any sort of automatic transmission, or the turbo engine.
  • Merc190 I would say Civic Si all the way if it still revved to 8300 rpm with no turbo. But nowadays I would pick the Corolla because I think they have a more clear idea on their respective models identity and mission. I also believe Toyota has a higher standard for quality.
  • Dave Holzman I think we're mixing up a few things here. I won't swear to it, but I'd be damned surprised if they were putting fire retardant in the seats of any cars from the '50s, or even the '60s. I can't quite conjure up the new car smell of the '57 Chevy my parents bought on October 17th of that year... but I could do so--vividly--until the last five years or so. I loved that scent, and when I smelled it, I could see the snow on Hollis Street in Cambridge Mass, as one or the other parent got ready to drive me to nursery school, and I could remember staring up at the sky on Christmas Eve, 1957, wondering if I might see Santa Claus flying overhead in his sleigh. No, I don't think the fire retardant on the foam in the seats of 21st (and maybe late 20th) century cars has anything to do with new car smell. (That doesn't mean new car small lacked toxicity--it probably had some.)
  • ToolGuy Is this a website or a podcast with homework? You want me to answer the QOTD before I listen to the podcast? Last time I worked on one of our vehicles (2010 RAV4 2.5L L4) was this past week -- replaced the right front passenger window regulator (only problem turned out to be two loose screws, but went ahead and installed the new part), replaced a bulb in the dash, finally ordered new upper dash finishers (non-OEM) because I cracked one of them ~2 years ago.Looked at the mileage (157K) and scratched my head and proactively ordered plugs, coils, PCV valve, air filter and a spare oil filter, plus a new oil filter housing (for the weirdo cartridge-type filter). Those might go in tomorrow. Is this interesting to you? It ain't that interesting to me. 😉The more intriguing part to me, is I have noticed some 'blowby' (but is it) when the oil filler cap is removed which I don't think was there before. But of course I'm old and forgetful. Is it worth doing a compression test? Leakdown test? Perhaps if a guy were already replacing the plugs...
  • Crown No surprise there. The toxic chemical stew of outgassing.
Next