Bailout Watch 377: Cash For Clunkers Pulled From Stimulus Bill

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

CNN Money reports that Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA) has pulled the “Clunker Culling” proposal from the economic stimulus plan making its way through Congress. The provision would have provided up to $4,500 in tax credits for scrapping a used vehicle with under 18 mpg and replacing it with a new car. The bill would have cost taxpayers up to $16b, according to CNN, which notes that lack of support from Republicans doomed the bill. Why? Apparently, “the provision required that the [new] vehicle be assembled in the United States.” Who knows, maybe common sense even had anything to do with it. President Obama did not take a strong position on the Clunker provision according to the Detroit News, but he is vocally backing $2b in battery development spending and a $600m purchase of fuel-efficient cars for the government fleet.

“Critics of this plan ridiculed our notion that we should use part of the money to modernize the entire fleet of federal vehicles to take advantage of state-of-the-art fuel efficiency. This is what they call pork,” Obama said in a speech at the U.S. Energy Department in Washington. “You know the truth,” the president said. “It will not only save the government significant money over time, it will not only create manufacturing jobs for folks who are making these cars, it will set a standard for private industry to match.”

Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal reports that by not naming a Car Czar, Obama is delaying efforts to negotiate an agreement with the UAW and GM/Chrysler bondholders. The deadline for a Car Czar appointment is less than two weeks away, and Chrysler’s Jim Press says his firm isn’t even in talks with bondholders. Obama has teams in the Treasury and National Economic Council working on the auto industry issue, and the WSJ’s unnamed source says, “we assume and expect that the companies will bring forward restructuring plans consistent with the terms of loan agreement on Feb. 17, and if they are not able to meet those terms we expect them to present an explanation for why that’s the case.” According to one GM executive interviewed, “apparently, a lot of candidates do not want that (Czar) job.” Great.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 6 comments
  • AuricTech AuricTech on Feb 06, 2009

    If I'm reading that Russian correctly, it translates to "non-winners." Or, if you prefer, LOSERS!

  • PeteMoran PeteMoran on Feb 06, 2009

    No clunker culling? That just means it will be replaced with something stupid'er and more short term.

  • El scotto Dale Carnegie had his grandkids do some upgrades?
  • El scotto Work it backwards. How many people use Tesla Super Chargers: Primary Charging Point - this is my normal charging station; Secondary charging station - at a retail location or planned on trips, Rarely or Not at All.
  • FreedMike Some clarification would make sense here: Tesla is laying off the team responsible for BUILDING NEW Supercharger stations. Apparently the ones already being built are going to be completed. The folks who maintain the current network are apparently unaffected. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/30/business/tesla-layoffs-supercharger-team.htmlAlso, many other other manufacturers are switching to NACS in the upcoming years, and some of those companies are already providing Supercharger adaptors for their non-NACS vehicles. Some Superchargers can already accomodate non-Tesla vehicles with a built in adaptor called the "magic dock."Given all this, my guess? They're trying to maximize utilization of the current system before building it out further.
  • Dartman Damn Healey! You can only milk a cow so many times a day! Don’t worry though I bet Flex, 28, 1991, and all the usual suspects are just getting their fingers warmed up!
  • FreedMike Your Ford AI instructor:
Next