Bailout Watch 271: Lutz: GM Will Ask For More Money.

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

With Bob Lutz pounding the media pavement for his credibility-challenged boss, it was only a matter of time before someone really hit the Maximum-quote jackpot. Chalk up a doozy for CNN, who snagged Lutz for its “American Morning” show, and got an interview which proves why Lutz was being kept away from bailout talk in the first place. The honesty flowed like single-malt in a boardroom from the very first question. When asked what GM would do with the $15b to ensure its survival, Lutz hedges, answering “this is simply a bridge loan which will get us into the next administration, where we hope we can do something more fundamental. Because the main problem is the lack of liquidity and the lack of revenue flowing in as we’re facing absolutely the lowest, lowest car market in history, and it’s not just the domestics.” AM anchor John Roberts, smelling blood in the water, presses Lutz. “You don’t see Toyota and Honda coming to the government for a handout. But based on what you said there — that this is just the beginning — you’re going to need more money next year?” To which Lutz replies “I think that’s a reasonable assumption.” Reasonable, eh?

When asked how much more money GM would request, Lutz came up just short of saying “as much as we can wrangle.” “At this point, you know, that’s going to have to be discussed with Congress. We’ll have to see. But this is definitely a bridge loan that will solve the immediate liquidity problem,” he said. “I don’t think anybody in Congress or the president-elect assumes that this is all the money that is going to be required to bridge this liquidity crisis that the American automobile industry is facing, and, again, it all depends on how fast we have an economic recovery. Again, let me restate this. At 10.8 or 10.5 million total market, we do not have a viable automobile industry in this country for anybody.”

The final questions of the interview led to a comedic riff on the possibility of job overlap between Lutz, the original Car Czar, and a presidentially-appointed Car Czar. When asked who he would like to see as the new Czar, Lutz was somewhat confused. “Wait a minute. We don’t know if it will be a czar or overseer. I doubt whether this person would dictate the product policy,” was the initial reaction. After being reassured that yes, the Car Czar could have a say on product mix, Lutz wasn’t any less bewildered. “I wouldn’t even — other than myself? Unfortunately I’m not available because I’m still gainfully employed.” For the moment, Bob. For the moment.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 26 comments
  • John Horner John Horner on Dec 09, 2008

    Some years ago I remember reading that the Japanese government effectively injected a bunch of cash into their automakers by taking over the responsibility for worker pensions. Now I can't find any reference to that news on the web, but I remember it from the pre-web days.

  • ZoomZoom ZoomZoom on Dec 09, 2008

    Some of those quotes may be good enough to get the speaker committed in the 70's. But in this decade, they're just normal spin! Farrah! A picture can be worth a thousand words, and that one sums up the 70's so well; but only if you were there; heh. I remember all the fat boys in school proudly wore their Farrah T-Shirts. It was really weird to the point that I wondered if they even made a "medium".

  • ToolGuy Let's count the poor decisions: Honda 18 model years past peak Honda. Ohio. Following too closely ('rock on the highway' doesn't leap up and attack your vehicle by itself, it is riding on a vehicle or thrown up by a vehicle, and you should be alert to this). Ohio. Not enough doors. Choosing to expand family -- in Ohio. 😉 Also not great at math.Engine bay picture: At least take a shower before your glamour shot lol.
  • ToolGuy Took me a minute to post; had to go back and see which account I was using the last time I commented on this topic (consistency is important). Thank you for your patience.
  • ToolGuy Ok wow, just wow. I used to live in America. Land of the free -- have I heard that somewhere? And here come TTAC writers and commentariat goose stepping in lockstep, dancing on the grave of liberty. Didn't your dysfunctional homeowners association get all that government overreach out of your system? I thought we won WW2, guess I was mistaken.
  • Dartman If one is so hellbent on drawing attention to themselves just mount a big “Trump 2024” or “Black Lives Matter” flag (your choice) on your truck and call it day. Lot cheaper, same result.
  • AZFelix I'd buy a 'harlequin' edition if it was composed of a company's complete palette of greys and silver.Family had a couple of Pontiacs in teal and purple in years past. I was not a fan.My current ride is Lakeside Blue.
Next