TTAC Bites the Bullet; Help Wanted

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago
I’ve looked at this TTAC paid subscription thing seven ways to Sunday. After more than four months, I still can't make it work. According to the vast majority of web-savvy TTAC’ers, this is no bad thing. Your advice has been steadfast: accept advertising. So when Federated Media Publishing offered to run TTAC’s advertising business for 40% of gross, I looked into it. My contact, Bill Brazell, assured me that TTAC’s editorial independence would be sacrosanct. Yeah, right. And then I read the fine print…

2.2 Review of Potential Advertisements. When FMP locates a potential buyer for all or part of an Available Advertising Space subject to an Availability Notice, FMP will send Author a notice (an “Advertising Review Notice”) to the email address specified on the Author Information Sheet. Each Advertising Review Notice will identify the buyer, the nature of advertisement the buyer wishes to place, the time period(s) during which the advertisement would run, and the price the buyer has offered to pay for the advertisement. Author will promptly respond to each Advertising Review Notice received and will indicate to FMP whether or not Author approves the proposed advertising described therein.

Advertising sucks. But it’s become clear that I can’t “gate” the TTAC community (sub it up) without losing the majority of current readers and, far worse, the possibility of new ones. Truth be told, if Federated Media Publishing hadn’t contacted me, that’s the way I would have gone, come Hell or lost visitors. But I don’t have the energy or financial resources to make it work, and I really do believe that the Fed’s different from the packs of jackals who’ve attempted to hijack TTAC in the past. To wit, another part of the contract gives me the right to restrict certain types of advertising, advertising categories and named advertisers. And then there's Federated Media Publishing’s “Author Mores:"

Authors who join the FM network of sites hold these values in common:

– Voice and Point of View: Strong voices and intelligent points of view drive robust conversations.

– Accuracy: Some FM sites are journalistic in nature; others are not. Regardless, FM sites strive for accuracy regarding items we post as facts.

– Community: Weblogs are conversations, not lectures. The community that gathers around each site is the essence of its value, and we treat that community accordingly. We listen and respond to feedback, and incorporate it into the way we manage our sites.

– Responsibility: We take our role in the community we serve seriously, and feel responsible for our own words. When we make mistakes, we correct them. We do not seek to use our sites maliciously.

– Transparency: We err on the side of disclosure to our readers. If we have an interest in something we’re writing about, we disclose that interest. We are as transparent as we can be about our site’s statistics, practices and policies.

Bottom line: TTAC needs money, if only to pay our writers a fee [more] commensurate with their time and talent. So I’ve decided to bite the bullet and sign-on with the Fed. I formally declare right here that I will never let advertising compromise TTAC’s editorial. At no point, now or in the future, will we pull our punches to please commercial sponsors. By now, I hope you’ll take me at my word. If not, well, by my deeds I shall be known.

OK, now, TTAC needs some help. First, we need a car booker: someone who can liaise with automotive manufacturers’ press departments to secure test vehicles for our far-flung editorial team. (I lack both the charm and the time for the gig.) The job’s best suited to a pistonhead who doesn’t have a “real job,” who doesn’t require a “real salary” or any “any” benefits. They need to be organized enough to remember who got what when, who’s getting what when (and where) and what we need to get for whom when and where. I’ll pay a stipend (for now) for each vehicle booked, plus all phone expenses. It’s an ideal job for someone who wants to get into automotive PR (baby Darth?).

We also need a racing correspondent, for NASCAR or any other major race series. There’s a lot of baseless hype and shady corporate shenanigans in mainstream motorsports, and I’d like TTAC to deal the inside dope. Obviously, the pay sucks, but the glory is infinite. If you’re interested in either position, use the contact button and email me your qualifications. Meanwhile, thanks again for your support. I promise TTAC will continue to lead the crusade for honest and passionate automotive journalism. I won’t let you down.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 56 comments
  • Aaronmc Aaronmc on Jul 26, 2006

    I support this endeavor completely. I think it's the best way to go. I would have paid, I really would have, but it's a fact of the internet that when previously free companies went for-pay, they died. Whatever keeps this site on the web. I actually really, really need it. I don't read anything else.

  • Lesley Lesley on Jul 26, 2006

    Oh yeah? Well your inverted sentence cancels out my typo, nanner, nanner.

  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Over 2 years with $7.5B Joe managed to build 8 EV charging stations. At this rate we'll have fusion powered cars before they're finished.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Define best?
  • Dartman Tesla had many first mover advantages that the fool Musk and his hand picked BOD have squandered. Like Trump he began to believe his own hype about being a “super genius “ and above the rules. Remember the take private for $420 funding in place scam? He now is trying to increase his control to 25% or he will take his AI project elsewhere. Can you imagine any other CEO attempting this type of corporate extortion/conflict of interest? Quit harping about the Q1 profits; serious investors don’t care about the past, only the future. The company is in a downward spiral.
  • 28-Cars-Later Yes because "Mustangs" are EVOs in Clown World.They're really desperate to find a use case for their faux pas. I guess track use is out? :D
  • KOKing BYD doesn't sell _consumer_ vehicles in the US. They've been selling transit buses for several years, and are building a school bus factory.
Next