SS Is Alive. Should Anyone Care?

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Autoweek apparently got an interview with GM vice president of global vehicle engineering and former chairman of Holden, Mark Reuss. Apparently, because their write-up takes a light hand with the quotation marks, using them to fill in the gaps between the author’s breathless interpretations of the topic at hand: Chevrolet’s SS line.

From 1960s Chevelles to modern Camaros, speedy Chevrolets have always been indentified with two letters: SS. But does the tradition-laden performance designation have a future in the new General Motors, which is under pressure to cut costs, make money and meet stricter fuel-economy regulations? “Absolutely,” Mark Reuss, GM vice president of global engineering, told AutoWeek. In fact, the SS line could be better–or at least more clearly defined. Reuss envisions cars outfitted on a case-by-case basis, rather than somewhat generically adding horsepower and red-letter stitching to Chevys across the board. Or as he put it, “Not trying to peanut-butter SS for everything.”

And though the intent of Reuss’s proclamation was clearly to encourage, the SS brand may be one of GM’s most-damaged. Here, for your viewing pleasure, are a few of the reasons why.





Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 29 comments
  • Geozinger Geozinger on Nov 20, 2009

    @panzerfaust: The Cobalt SS is competitively priced against it's competition, i.e. Mazda 3 Speed, or VW GTI. To compare the top of the line Cobalt against the bottom rung Camaro is an apples to oranges exercise. Yes, there's a $10K difference between the base Cobalt and the top Cobalt SS, but a base Cobalt starts out with a lot less equipment than does the V6 Camaro, other car lines (Civic, Mazda 3, etc.) are priced in the same manner. @Bunter 1, "IMHO, Chevy SS made any reason for Pontiac to exist disappear a long time ago." I agree with this in a roundabout way. Since Pontiac is now defunct, the Chevy SS's (SSes?) can now take the place that Pontiac had in the hierarchy of GM. The reality is that former Pontiac owners are going to want to have something different than a 'regular' Chevy in the brave new GM world. And they may not want a Buick, maybe ever. GM should take the lesson to heart from the loss of former Oldsmobile buyers who wandered away from GM and offer a line of SS models to replace the Pontiacs that folks desire.

  • Reclusive_in_nature Reclusive_in_nature on Nov 21, 2009

    I think the recent Impala SS is worthy of the moniker (of course I own one). Say what you want about it's handling or how hard the plastics are, but when it comes down to it most vehicles I meet at a red light get destroyed. The feeling I get when I smoke some dumb ass kid who's idea of performance is tacking a giant spoiler and coffee can exhaust on a Honda makes up for any short comings a critic could come with. As for being stereotyped, well, it's only happened once. Some teen at a carwash called it a hick car. I called his car a weedeater. Escalation ensued. I still don't have the heart to get the windshield repaired where his head got slammed and his tooth/teeth chipped the glass.

    • Don1967 Don1967 on Nov 21, 2009

      The 1990s Imapala SS probably was the last real "SS" GM ever produced... it was certainly closer to the original theme than anything since. Unfortunately, today's "SS" designation is more descriptive of the sound air makes when coming out of a tire.

  • El scotto They should be supping with a very, very long spoon.
  • El scotto [list=1][*]Please make an EV that's not butt-ugly. Not Jaguar gorgeous but Buick handsome will do.[/*][*] For all the golf cart dudes: A Tesla S in Plaid mode will be the fastest ride you'll ever take.[/*][*]We have actual EV owners posting on here. Just calmly stated facts and real world experience. This always seems to bring out those who would argue math.[/*][/list=1]For some people an EV will never do, too far out in the country, taking trips where an EV will need recharged, etc. If you own a home and can charge overnight an EV makes perfect sense. You're refueling while you're sleeping.My condo association is allowing owners to install chargers. You have to pay all of the owners of the parking spaces the new electric service will cross. Suggested fee is 100$ and the one getting a charger pays all the legal and filing fees. I held out for a bottle of 30 year old single malt.Perhaps high end apartments will feature reserved parking spaces with chargers in the future. Until then non home owners are relying on public charge and one of my neighbors is in IT and he charges at work. It's call a perk.I don't see company owned delivery vehicles that are EV's. The USPS and the smiley boxes should be the 1st to do this. Nor are any of our mega car dealerships doing this and but of course advertising this fact.I think a great many of the EV haters haven't came to the self-actualization that no one really cares what you drive. I can respect and appreciate what you drive but if I was pushed to answer, no I really don't care what you drive. Before everyone goes into umbrage over my last sentence, I still like cars. Especially yours.I have heated tiles in my bathroom and my kitchen. The two places you're most likely to be barefoot. An EV may fall into to the one less thing to mess with for many people.Macallan for those who were wondering.
  • EBFlex The way things look in the next 5-10 years no. There are no breakthroughs in battery technology coming, the charging infrastructure is essentially nonexistent, and the price of entry is still way too high.As soon as an EV can meet the bar set by ICE in range, refueling times, and price it will take off.
  • Jalop1991 Way to bury the lead. "Toyota to offer two EVs in the states"!
  • Jalop1991 I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that.
Next