September Sales: Honda Falls 20 Percent, Toyota Drops 13 Percent, Nissan Skids 7 Percent

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

The three Japanese majors saw September sales slides that were generally closer to Ford’s mild Clunker hangover than GM and Chrysler’s cliff dive belly-flop. Honda‘s 20 percent overall decline was the worst of the bunch, and was led by a 30 percent drop in Acura sales. In contrast, Toyota-brand vehicles fell 19.1 percent while Lexus actually recorded a 7.3 percent increase. Nissan-brand sales declined a mere 5.8 percent, while Infiniti fell 15 percent.

Honda saw declines for every nameplate except Pilot (+.5 percent) and the new-model Insight which sold 1,746 units. Accord dropped 10.6 percent, Civic fell 28.4 percent while Fit flopped by a staggering 51 percent, probably on low post-Clunker availability. The previously unstoppable CRV shed 12.3 percent, its first decline in many months. Ridgeline (-42.2 percent), Odyssey (-48.9 percent), and Element (-54.1 percent) all dropped with the the alacrity of a Chrysler nameplate. On the Acura front, TSX was the only glimmer of hope, slipping by a mere 5.8 percent. TL fell 35.4 percent, RL slumped 44.4 percent, RDX was off 20.5 while MDX tanked by 41.9 percent.

Toyota saw a similar Clunker crash in its car sales, especially the Yaris which tanked by 68 percent. Corolla saw a mild decline, down 6.6 percent, while Camry fell 16.2 percent. Avalon dropped by 45.3 percent, while the new Venza logged a disappointing 4,738. Even Toyota’s rock-solid Prius and Rav-4 were off by 3 percent. Land Cruiser increased by 20 percent, but volume was a mere 233 units. Highlander fell only 12.6 percent, but Sienna fell 36 percent, and Sequoia was down 45.6 percent. FJ Cruiser and 4Runner were down 74.8 percent and 78.4 percent respectively. Tundra and Tacoma each fell by about 21 points.

Toyota’s Scion division continued to be a huge disappointment, with no nameplate falling less than 50 percent. The less said there, the better. Lexus saw a 5.5 percent increase from IS sales and a staggering 70 percent bump in RX sales. ES was down 27.7 percent, LS fell below four-digit-sales with a 39.7 percent decline, and GS was down 50.8 percent. LX and GX SUVs were off by 54.4 percent and 65.8 percent respectively.

Compared to its Japanese competitors, Nissan’s car sales were quite steady. Versa lost 23.9 percent but Sentra was down only 5.8 percent and Cube added 2,230 units. Maxima increased 18.1 percent, while Altima slid 24.3 percent and 350/370Z (combined for some reason) were up 53 percent. Frontier saw a staggering 41 percent sales increase, although this was offset by a 33.8 percent decline in Titan sales. Pathfinder increased 37.3 percent, Quest rose 36.1 percent, Xterra was up 8.7 percent and Rogue edged up .7 percent. Murano fell 12.9 percent and Armada was off 13.1 percent.

At Infiniti, a 14.3 percent increase in G-series coupes was accompanied by a 5.8 increase in G-series sedan sales and an inconsequential doubling of QX56 sales to 677 units. On the downside, M-series fell 58.5 percent, EX dropped 56 percent and FX was off 31.3 percent.

The minor slides endured by the Japanese majors proves two points with crystal clarity: first, that Cash For Clunkers pulled sales forward and caused a minor depression in its wake, and second that GM and Chrysler are in a special hell of their own making. Honda’s decline was the worst, but it also disproportionally benefited from C4C. Toyota and Nissan saw smaller increases during C4C and endured smaller declines on the backend. These firms have shown that though the market may swing up and down, their market shares are relatively safe. The same can not be said of GM and Chrysler.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 34 comments
  • Canucknucklehead Canucknucklehead on Oct 02, 2009

    Japanese majors fall off a cliff? What about Government Motors?????

  • John Williams John Williams on Oct 03, 2009

    @ Autosavant: "It is estimated that when Honda dropped the “Legend” brand, it lost $1,000,000,000 in name recognition-value." It wasn't just the brand recognition. When the Legend nameplate was dropped (in favor of the RL nonclementure), the car itself was transformed from an athletic, somewhat competitive 2- and 4-door near-luxury performance sedan (available with 5 and 6 speed manuals!) to something of a LS400/S-Class expy with a lackluster engine, bereft of any sporting potential. The Vigor was dropped in favor of a softened-up TL. Ever since then, Acura's been climbing that greased-up slope of near-luxury, not sure of how to pull people in when you're literally sitting on the fence between luxury and performance. I bet a lot of people who wanted a Legend but found the RL instead bought themselves a nice Audi or BMW. Now Acuras have become visually repulsive as well as only semi-appealing performance-wise. Honda really doesn't know what to do with this brand or how to take it any further. I don't expect them to hang it up, but something has to give or someone had better come up with a good idea. Getting rid of the cartoonish grilles will be a good step in the right direction. The Infiniti G series is literally the spiritual successor of the Legend. Nissan probably won't fall into the same trap, since they pretty much started off with alphanumerics in the first place. "Lincoln took it even further with the meaningless alphanumerics, and new Lincolns are Butt-ugly Ford Edsels, obese too, cartoon-like grilles, and prices of a V8 but have a V6 instead. Very appealing.. NOT!" Lincoln is just as confused. They want to be an American Acura, but the products are pretty much Mercury-grade, just a step above the nicest Ford. This might be why Mercury's being shoved out of the picture. It's good for volume, but bad if you have two brands with roughly the same luxury qualities and cachet coexisting with one another. If Mercury goes, Lincoln won't have a chance of clawing its way back to the full luxury ranks.

  • Orange260z I'm facing the "tire aging out" issue as well - the Conti ECS on my 911 have 2017 date codes but have lots (likely >70%) tread remaining. The tires have spent quite little time in the sun, as the car has become a garage queen and has likely had ~10K kms put on in the last 5 years. I did notice that they were getting harder last year, as the car pushes more in corners and the back end breaks loose under heavy acceleration. I'll have to do a careful inspection for cracks when I get the car out for the summer in the coming weeks.
  • VoGhost Interesting comments. Back in reality, AV is already here, and the experience to date has been that AV is far safer than most drivers. But I guess your "news" didn't tell you that, for some reason.
  • Doc423 Come try to take it, Pal. Environmental Whacko.
  • 28-Cars-Later Mazda despite attractive styling has resale issues - 'Yota is always the answer.
  • 28-Cars-Later Try again.
Next