Investor Reneges; GMAC Headed for C11. GM Next?

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reports that General Motor’s former captive finance unit and current chest-strapped TNT device looks set to miss its deadline for a debt-for-equity swap. GMAC needs to get the deal done to transform itself into a bank and score federal funding under the Troubled Asset Relief Plan (TARP). “GMAC needs to show $30 billion of capital in order to become a bank holding company regulated by the Federal Reserve… As of Wednesday, GMAC had received 58% of existing, eligible GMAC debt securities and 38% of outstanding debt securities of ResCap (as the mortgage unit is also known) — little changed from late Tuesday. Around 75% of the selected securities must be tendered for the proposed debt restructuring to succeed in raising capital that would go toward satisfying GMAC’s conditions to become a bank holding company.” Those plans took a major hit today…

Pacific Investment Management Co., a large bondholder of GMAC LLC debt, is unlikely to participate in the lender’s massive debt restructuring offer, said a person familiar with the matter.”

A WSJ source says if GMAC fails to reach its goals by close of play tomorrow, it might put its ailing mortgage unit, Residential Capital LLC, into bankruptcy. The move would be an attempt to cauterize the wound, so that GMAC could continue its auto financing and other operations. If that fails, and GMAC as a whole goes down, GM is through. Thousands of GM dealers would lose inventory financing and go belly-up, flooding the market with hundreds of thousands of unsellable vehicles.

This on the eve of the President’s decision on GM and Chrysler’s “managed bankruptcy” or similar. It’s going to be a busy not to say historic day…

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 32 comments
  • PeteMoran PeteMoran on Dec 19, 2008

    @ nonce Thanks for sharing. Back-door it through GMAC eh? The black hole maybe real. Hang on for a rough ride everybody.

  • Pch101 Pch101 on Dec 19, 2008
    If the car companies stay in business after this mess the dealerships should be run with one demonstrator model of each car, and then if the customer wants to purchase that model his car is “made to order” from the factory like a Subway sandwich. That model will not work in the US, for a lot of reasons. The current business model works well here, but the domestics have too many dealerships for the dealers themselves to be profitable. The best dealers would be better off if they had less competition from fewer dealers. On another note, we're now going to get to see how fragile the GM operation really is. They've been dumping inventory that can't be sold into the dealerships in order to claim the revenue on their books. With that gimmick under threat, their financial picture is going to get much uglier very quickly.
  • SCE to AUX With these items under the pros:[list][*]It's quick, though it seems to take the powertrain a second to get sorted when you go from cruising to tromping on it.[/*][*]The powertrain transitions are mostly smooth, though occasionally harsh.[/*][/list]I'd much rather go electric or pure ICE I hate herky-jerky hybrid drivetrains.The list of cons is pretty damning for a new vehicle. Who is buying these things?
  • Jrhurren Nissan is in a sad state of affairs. Even the Z mentioned, nice though it is, will get passed over 3 times by better vehicles in the category. And that’s pretty much the story of Nissan right now. Zero of their vehicles are competitive in the segment. The only people I know who drive them are company cars that were “take it or leave it”.
  • Jrhurren I rented a RAV for a 12 day vacation with lots of driving. I walked away from the experience pretty unimpressed. Count me in with Team Honda. Never had a bad one yet
  • ToolGuy I don't deserve a vehicle like this.
  • SCE to AUX I see a new Murano to replace the low-volume Murano, and a new trim level for the Rogue. Yawn.
Next