TTAC Rewind: 2016 Chrysler 200 Limited Rental Review
February 5th, 2023 12:15 PM Share
Today's TTAC Rewind takes us back a few years to 2016 when Jack wrote up a rental review of the 2016 Chrysler 200.
For today's reading pleasure, spend a few minutes reading Mr. Baruth's attempt to convince you that the 200 is actually pretty dang good.
Thanks for spending a Sunday with us.
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Published February 5th, 2023 12:15 PM
Join the conversation
4 of 42 comments
A roof line approximately 2 inches taller would have made a world of a difference. As for the rest of the car, it was no better or worse than the rest of the sedans of the time and I do like the idea of a V6 in a car of this size.
But this all water under the bride now days.
Let's be honest it was the best-looking car in FCA's bland lineup. Along with the LH-cars the 200 was the best family sedan the company ever produced.
It suffered the same small back seat problem that the Ford Contour and Mercury Mystique did. 2 more inches in wheelbase or a taller roof would've helped a lot.
But the biggest issue was that it wasn't a SUV/crossover/soft-roader with 3 rows in a market that couldn't get enough of them.
Pretty average car in a segment where average means, basement. Accord, Camry, Mazda 6 were all superior offerings when the 200 was on the market. The Fusion suffered from a smaller interior as well, but offered superior power options including the Hybrid and the 2.0 Turbo. Even Sonata and Optima were equal to the 200 with the benefit of the Korean's 10-year warranty. This is a segment where product rules and the cellar dwellers end up banished to the Hertz mid-size role. Every 200 I ever drove was a rental and it never caused me to even think again about buying one.