Texas Seeks to Bin Annual Inspections

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Earlier this week, politicians in the Lone Star State approved a bill in which the provision exists to eliminate yearly inspections for non-commercial vehicles. If signed into law by the governor, Texans won’t have to run their personal cars through the inspection wringer once the calendar flips into the year 2025.

As you’d expect, there’s plenty of jaw-flapping on both sides of the issue. A lawmaker from the Galveston area has said “Vehicle inspections are a costly and time consuming process that provide little benefit to public safety,” while a smattering of groups are warning about trading “safety for convenience”.


Removing the need for yearly vehicle inspections is a thorny topic. One side claims the requirement is nothing more than a dog-and-pony show, one which can take uninformed motorists for an expensive ride if unscrupulous individuals demand compliance repairs which aren’t actually needed. On the other side of the fence, images are brought forth of clapped-out and unsafe vehicles becoming a menace on our roads.


As always, the truth tends to lie somewhere in the middle. It’d be a stretch to think that Texas roads will immediately devolve into lawless wastelands dominated by rusty Silverado pickup trucks held together with duct tape and a bit of rabbit wire, though there will certainly be bad players who will take advantage of the situation and run a set of dangerously bald tires for yet another year. However, one can rightly argue a motorist with that type of attitude will drive their car anyway, regardless of whether an inspection is required.


Then there’s the musing that inspections are applied unfairly. If Car X is driven 35,000 miles a year but Car Z’s wheels only turn half that amount, there’s a case to be made that X’s wear items will obviously be laid waste far sooner than Z’s – yet both rigs are required to undergo scrutiny at the same intervals. Texas is one of the few states to currently require annual inspections of non-commercial vehicles owned by private individuals. As an aside, should this bill be signed into law, an extra fee will be tacked on vehicle registration costs to continue funding the Texas Mobility Fund. That’s a bank of cash intended to pay for new highways. Right now, most of the basic inspection fee is directed to that fund. Any enormous repair bills are, of course, funneled into the coffers of a garage.


One thing’s for sure – state inspections are a big and, in some corners, very profitable business. Whatever decision is made, someone’s going to be unhappy.


[Image: Author]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by   subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 61 comments
  • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Jun 02, 2023

    In Massachusetts, they used to require an inspection every 6 months, checking your brake lights, turn signals, horn, and headlight alignment, for two bucks.


    Now I get an "inspection" every two years in California, and all they check is the smog. MAYBE they notice the tire tread, squeaky brakes, or steering when they drive it into the bay, but all they check is the smog equipment and tailpipe emissions.


    For all they would know, the headlights, horn, and turn signals might not work, and the car has a "speed wobble" at 45 mph. AFAIK, they don't even check EVs.

  • GregLocock GregLocock on Jun 02, 2023

    Two adjacent states in Australia have different attitudes to roadworthy inspections. In NSW they are annual. In Victoria they only occur at change of ownership. As you'd expect this leads to many people in Vic keeping their old car.


    So if the worrywarts are correct Victoria's roads would be full of beaten up cars and so have a high accident rate compared with NSW. Oh well, the stats don't agree.


    https://www.lhd.com.au/lhd-insights/australian-road-death-statistics/

    • Jeff S Jeff S on Jun 03, 2023

      Agree even the oldest hooptie today is a much safer vehicle than that of 20 to 40 years ago. Vehicles are much safer today even the average old one than decades ago. Seat belts, air bags, anti lock brakes, vehicle roofs that are reinforced for roll overs, better rust corrosion treatment, and vehicles are built to have crush zones that lessen the impact to the occupants reducing injuries and deaths. Vehicles might be more boring in design but they are much safer.


  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
  • Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
  • Lou_BC I had a 2010 Ford F150 and 2010 Toyota Sienna. The F150 went through 3 sets of brakes and Sienna 2 sets. Similar mileage and 10 year span.4 sets tires on F150. Truck needed a set of rear shocks and front axle seals. The solenoid in the T-case was replaced under warranty. I replaced a "blend door motor" on heater. Sienna needed a water pump and heater blower both on warranty. One TSB then recall on spare tire cable. Has a limp mode due to an engine sensor failure. At 11 years old I had to replace clutch pack in rear diff F150. My ZR2 diesel at 55,000 km. Needs new tires. Duratrac's worn and chewed up. Needed front end alignment (1st time ever on any truck I've owned).Rear brakes worn out. Left pads were to metal. Chevy rear brakes don't like offroad. Weird "inside out" dents in a few spots rear fenders. Typically GM can't really build an offroad truck issue. They won't warranty. Has fender-well liners. Tore off one rear shock protector. Was cheaper to order from GM warehouse through parts supplier than through Chevy dealer. Lots of squeaks and rattles. Infotainment has crashed a few times. Seat heater modual was on recall. One of those post sale retrofit.Local dealer is horrific. If my son can't service or repair it, I'll drive 120 km to the next town. 1st and last Chevy. Love the drivetrain and suspension. Fit and finish mediocre. Dealer sucks.
  • MaintenanceCosts You expect everything on Amazon and eBay to be fake, but it's a shame to see fake stuff on Summit Racing. Glad they pulled it.
Next