Lucid Lowers Production Targets After Disappointing Q1

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Lucid Group’s report for the first quarter of 2023 was off the mark, with the automaker suffering a $780-million net loss. While any burgeoning carmaker should expect to burn through cash for a while, electric-vehicle firms seem broadly dedicated to the practice. Many EV startups have floundered and some have even bordered on shell games, promising things they shouldn’t in the hopes to draw in more investment capital. However, Lucid has seemed committed to delivering enviable products — making the financial report genuinely disappointing. 


If you’ve read anything written by me about electric vehicles, you’ll know that I am no fanboy. Blindly championing an entire sub-genre of automobiles seems like a poor way to ensure better products. But Lucid managed to release cars that even I would have considered buying if money were less of a concern.


Sadly, it looks like even the big spenders want to save money where they can. Chief rival Tesla has been lowering prices, with CEO Elon Musk citing recessional pressures. But tweaking the MSRP of vehicles has also allowed it to continue taking advantage of government subsidies while also applying heat to mainstay and startup automakers producing EVs.


"I believe that there is a challenge to the entire market right now because of macroeconomics and because of interest rates," Lucid CEO Peter Rawlinson said on Monday.


While it’s not exactly uncommon these days, Lucid has already announced restructuring plans that included laying off about 1,300 employees. Reuters noted that represents about 18-percent of its total workforce, adding that the Air luxury sedan still starts at $87,400.


That’s not really all that bad for a segment that’s loaded up with vehicles loaded up on either side of the six-figure range, especially since there’s a lot to like about the car. But Tesla’s Model S is still competitive, despite showing its age, and has the brand recognition everyone else envies.


From Reuters:


The company reported quarterly revenue of $149.4 million, compared with analysts' average estimate of $209.9 million, according to Refinitiv. It last month reported first-quarter production and delivery figures lower than in the preceding three months.
"The revenue was actually the weakest that's been since the second quarter of last year, so there's a big miss on the top line," said Garrett Nelson, analyst at CFRA Research. "This could be an indication that this pricing war is having a direct impact on their results."
Rawlinson said on Monday the company was on track to produce over 10,000 vehicles in 2023, compared with an earlier forecast for 10,000 to 14,000 units this year.
The first quarter net loss widened to $779.5 million from $604.6 million a year earlier, while cash and cash equivalents fell to $900 million at the end of the first quarter from $1.74 billion in the fourth quarter.


It’s not a great report and Lucid’s top dog also acknowledged that brand awareness needed to come up, noting that Andrea Soriani would now head the company’s marketing efforts. Though Rawlinson did have some good news to share.


"We're seeing some early wins," Rawlinson said. "The number of test drives has nearly doubled in the first quarter from the fourth quarter of last year."


"We're still early on in our customer growth stage of innovators and early adopters,” he continued, adding that a revised marketing push should help the cause.


Considering Tesla's overwhelmingly dominant role in the all-electric space. Simply being a blip on the public radar is probably heartening. I rarely hear individuals who aren’t obsessed with cars reference any EV that’s not made by Tesla. However, numerous people I know expressed an interest in both Lucid and Rivian products this year. Though, considering data suggesting that EV demand will remain lower than anticipated (at least in North America), that may not turn out to be a big win for the above companies.


Ultimately, it’s not obvious that demand has matured sufficiently for every luxury automaker to produce all-electric sedans retailing dangerously close to (or above) $100,000. Your author is less inclined to believe that Lucid’s problems are the result of a pricing war between all-electric luxury sedans, however.


While perhaps lacking in terms of NVH and interior polish against Porsche’s Taycan or the BMW i7, Lucid’s Air offers the kind of range that other manufacturers should aspire to. Granted, you do have to pay more to get into the trims offering bigger batteries. But they’re there, right along with some of the quickest 0-60 times any sedan has ever boasted. On paper, Lucid’s offerings are highly competitive and the company seems to be gunning for Tesla in particular.


For what it’s worth, Lucid attributed production shortfalls to supply chain disruptions and noted that higher interest rates and economic hurdles are negatively affecting demand in the broader sense. Valid or not, supply chain issues are becoming a hackneyed excuse used by all automakers and we’re all losing patience. It’s been years since things went sideways during the global pandemic tantrum and the industry needs to get itself organized.


Lucid hasn’t said exactly how many orders are on the books that still need to be built. But leadership seems confident that demand will continue to grow with the right kind of advertising. In fact, the company is currently on a national tour where the Air will be displayed at pop-up stores located in key markets.


But will it still be around by the time those efforts have paid off? The company seems to think so and CFO Sherry House has confirmed that it presently has $4.1 billion in liquidity. That’s supposedly enough enough to fund Lucid into second quarter of next year — if not a little longer.


[Image: Jonathan Weiss/Shutterstock]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter. 

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 21 comments
  • Bobbysirhan Bobbysirhan on May 10, 2023

    Dan Neil tipped Lucid to fail on Reddit yesterday. If any auto-writer has access to the people at the levers of our fascist command economy, it is Dan Neil.

  • Akear Akear on May 11, 2023

    The lucid is suffering from the Preston Tucker syndrome, where a superior product fails due lack of marketing and manufacturing expertise. Francis Coppola made a film about Preston Tucker a few decades ago.

  • Tassos I, TASSOS, am a MISERABLE PERSON WITH NOTHING positive or neutral to add. I USED TO BE ACCOMPLISHED but THE CHANGE IN my demeanour following MY COGNITIVE DECLINE, has undone all of MY CONTRIBUTIONS.
  • Polishdon I owned a '16 Chrysler 200s. Bought it used with around 8K miles and traded it in with 90K miles (Wife hates cars with 100K+ miles). It was extremely reliable and was towed just one (Due to duel flats and bent rims from a pothole my daughter who was driving failed to avoid). Was a great car, only pet peeve was the rear seat entry. That was terrible. Replaced it with a brand new '23 Camry LE. Biggest mistake ever! Car has had nothing but minor/mid-level gremlins since day one. Parts falling off, paint issue, rim/tire issues, Bluetooth connection problems, TPMS issues, etc. Going back to the dealer AGAIN in a few weeks for another round of service.
  • Bil65789488 Consumers or manufacturers didn't kill sedans, the government, CAFE, and ZEV killed sedans. With far higher standards and taxes/penalties on sedans than SUVs or trucks, it is no mystery why this is happening.
  • Redapple2 Flyer: Caveat. Subaru. Near 9 inches ground clearance and near Land Rover AWD system, They can do some impressive things off road. (I m not talking Moab trails).
  • Corey Lewis The short truck is terrible. The tire blocks all rear visibility while making the tiny bed very tricky to access. And the wheels on it look like they're from 2002. Other than that, I really like the idea of the Grenadier and it seems like a good effort. I wouldn't buy one because of the tractor recirculating ball steering, which makes it terrible in everyday use.
Next