Ford Unleashes Track-Only GT Mk IV

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Dearborn is having one final fling with what Ford is calling the “last-and-final” of the third-gen Ford GT builds. Set to be called the GT Mk IV – in honor of its Le Mans effort in 1967 – this track-only weapon will have a trick EcoBoost mill pushing 800 horsepower and a completely different wheelbase measurement compared to a standard GT.


In other words, this is a lot more than a cynical paint-n-wallpaper package.


As a homage to the famous ’67 campaign in which Ford won the 24 Hours of Le Mans, Ford is creating this Mk IV for rich punters who want to get one up on their buddies who have a workaday GT. Whilst specifics are rather slim at present, Ford will say the Mk IV has a chassis with a longer wheelbase, something which surely was not cheap (or quick) to engineer. As a reference point, the original GT Mk IV of 1967 had a wheelbase stretched 9 inches longer than its predecessors. The global director of Ford Motorsport, Mark Rushbrook, alleges the carbon fiber body is ‘completely new’ and aero functional.


They will say that they’re calling its carbon fiber construction a “long tail” body, suggesting all or most of the extra length will go towards aero improvements at the car’s rear; indeed, the bumf tells us the GT Mk IV has an aero-focused exterior design. McLaren has used the same trick in cars such as the 600LT, though that machine is road legal. One look at the Mk IV, with its outrageous wing and diffusers, confirms that is not the case with this Ford.

Without going into detail, engineers say the 2023 Ford GT Mk IV is expected to make more than 800 horsepower from its EcoBoost engine, assisted by a ‘race transmission’ and Multimatic’s adaptive spool valve suspension. Remember, that’s the Canadian company that has a big hand in the GT gestation and a huge back catalog of delivering competition/track cars to race teams and individual customers. With that resumé, it makes sense that Ford has decided to offer a GT with these credentials.


Price? If you have to ask, a cool $1.7 million – plus access to a racetrack, of course. The so-called ‘client selections’ will occur in the first quarter of next year, with deliveries expected in late spring of the 2023 calendar year. 


[Images: Ford]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 6 comments
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I own my house 100% paid for at age 52. the answer is still NO.-28k (realistically) would take 8 years to offset my gas truck even with its constant repair bills (thanks chevy)-Still takes too long to charge UNTIL solidsate batteries are a thing and 80% in 15 minutes becomes a reality (for ME anyways, i get others are willing to wait)For the rest of the market, especially people in dense cityscape, apartments dens rentals it just isnt feasible yet IMO.
  • ToolGuy I do like the fuel economy of a 6-cylinder engine. 😉
  • Carson D I'd go with the RAV4. It will last forever, and someone will pay you for it if you ever lose your survival instincts.
  • THX1136 A less expensive EV would make it more attractive. For the record, I've never purchased a brand new vehicle as I have never been able to afford anything but used. I think the same would apply to an EV. I also tend to keep a vehicle way longer than most folks do - 10+ years. If there was a more affordable one right now then other things come to bear. There are currently no chargers in my immediate area (town of 16K). I don't know if I can afford to install the necessary electrical service to put one in my car port right now either. Other than all that, I would want to buy what I like from a cosmetic standpoint. That would be a Charger EV which, right now, doesn't exist and I couldn't afford anyway. I would not buy an EV just to be buying an EV. Nothing against them either. Most of my constraints are purely financial being 71 with a disabled wife and on a fixed income.
  • ToolGuy Two more thoughts, ok three:a) Will this affordable EV have expressive C/D pillars, detailing on the rocker panels and many many things happening around the headlamps? Asking for a friend.b) Will this affordable EV have interior soft touch plastics and materials lifted directly from a European luxury sedan? Because if it does not, the automotive journalists are going to mention it and that will definitely spoil my purchase decision.c) Whatever the nominal range is, I need it to be 2 miles more, otherwise no deal. (+2 rule is iterative)
Next