Acura ZDX Returning As Brand’s First EV

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
We’re committed to finding, researching, and recommending the best products. We earn commissions from purchases you make using links in our articles. Learn more here
acura zdx returning as brands first ev

Acura has announced that its first electric vehicle will be called the ZDX – a model you might not remember if car spotting isn’t among your favorite hobbies. Introduced in 2009, the original came into being just as crossover vehicles were starting to become mainstream. But the ZDX remains an exceptionally rare bird due to it being considered an oddball in its own time. Acura only managed to move 3,200 units inside the U.S. during its first full year on sale. That also happened to be its best year by far and explains why the car was quietly killed off in 2013.

Whether Honda’s luxury division feels like the model never got the praise it deserved or simply doesn’t want to risk using a more storied nameplate for its first EV is anyone’s guess. But Acura seems eager to assure the public that the upcoming vehicle will have more in common with the older ZDX’s more-practical successors, the MDX and RDX. 

"The ZDX will be Acura’s first zero-emissions SUV and the name pays homage to a previous Acura model of the same name, which was the first vehicle styled from the ground up in the Acura Design Studio which opened in Los Angeles in 2007,” the automaker explained in its release. 

Assumed to be released in 2024, the new Acura ZDX is being co-developed with General Motors. This means it’ll make use of the American carmaker’s Ultium batteries until Honda has established its own electric vehicle architecture. We also know that it’ll also be designed “from the ground up” at the Acura Design Studio located in L.A.

Beyond that, we don’t have a lot of information.

Acura said that there would be a Type S designed to cater to customers interested in spirited driving. But having effectively no information on the standard unit makes speculating about the performance variant pointless. We don’t even know what type of body style the ZDX will have – though Acura did say that the production model would be inspired by the Precision EV Concept. That probably means a straight beltline and two-box design with just enough curves to keep things interesting. Come to think of it, that kind of sounds like the Cadillac Lyriq – another Ultium EV that was previously rumored to share an assembly line in Springhill, Tennessee, with the model the Precision EV Concept was supposed to foreshadow. 

That could make the Lyriq a good starting point for making unsubstantiated assumptions about the ZDX. The Cadillac is roughly 197 inches in length and 78 inches wide with a single rear permanent-magnet motor and 100-kWh battery lurking beneath the floorboards. Our guess is that the Acura won’t stray too far from that recipe. While this likely means any visual influence from the previous ZDX will be minimal, something tells me this won’t be ruffling any feathers. 

Interested parties wanting to know more could be in for a wait, however. Despite news of the ZDX’s upcoming arrival in 2024, it’s unlikely that Acura will have much to say for at least a few more months. 

[Images: Acura]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends, regulation, and the bitter-sweet nature of modern automotive tech. Research focused and gut driven.

More by Matt Posky

Join the conversation
2 of 18 comments
  • Jkross22 Jkross22 on Aug 22, 2022

    Acura marketing believes resusitating a terrible name from a blah vehicle that was ugly and didn't sell well is a great name for their future EV?

    Let me help..... Here's a name they are free to use - skidmark. I'll use it in a sentence.

    The Acura marketing team is a bunch of skidmarks for thinking this is a good idea.

  • SPPPP SPPPP on Aug 23, 2022

    Well, some beloved nameplates have been resurrected and found success. There are several examples, including a number from Chrysler, like the Challenger and Charger. ( Some beloved nameplates have been resurrected and found a cool reception - like the Ford Thunderbird or (ominously) Acura's own NSX. The question is, what happens when you bring back an *unloved* nameplate? Oddly, Chrysler has done this to success as well, with the Pacifica. But can Acura manage it? (Edit for one more thought - This might be like Ford choosing to name its first "high-effort" EV after the Edsel, rather than the Mustang. Would Ford dare to try it, if they thought it was important?)

  • Lorenzo A union in itself doesn't mean failure, collective bargaining would mean failure.
  • Ajla Why did pedestrian fatalities hit their nadir in 2009 and overall road fatalities hit their lowest since 1949 in 2011? Sedans were more popular back then but a lot of 300hp trucks and SUVs were on the road starting around 2000. And the sedans weren't getting smaller and slower either. The correlation between the the size and power of the fleet with more road deaths seems to be a more recent occurrence.
  • Jeff_M It's either a three on the tree OR it's an automatic. It ain't both.
  • Lorenzo I'm all in favor of using software and automation to BUILD cars, but keep that junk off my instrument panel, especially the software enabled interactive junk. Just give me the knobs and switches so I can control the vehicle, with no interconnectivity of any kind.
  • MaintenanceCosts Modern cars detach people from their speed too much. The combination of tall ride height, super-effective sound insulation, massive power, and electronic aids makes people quite unaware of just how much kinetic energy is nominally under their control while they watch a movie on their phone with one hand and eat a Quarter Pounder with the other. I think that is the primary reason we are seeing an uptick in speed-related fatalities, especially among people NOT in cars.With that said, I don't think Americans have proven responsible enough to have unlimited speed in cars. Although I'd hate it, I still would support limiters that kick in at 10 over in the city and 20 over on the freeway, because I think they would save more than enough lives to be worth the pain.