Polestar Seats: Virtue Signaling Now Standard

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

In service of promoting its own sustainability goals, Polestar has opted to offer seating with small print that details the carbon footprint of your chosen upholstery. Though it doesn’t actually matter whether you’ve selected wool, Nappa leather, or faux-leather vinyl (which Polestar calls MicoTech) because the company appears to have labels ready for every option. It’s commercialized virtue signaling at its finest and will become commonplace on every model it sells, starting with the 2024 Polestar 3 SUV. 


According to Car and Driver, the manufacturer believes the labels will improve transparency about its climate impact and better inform customers about the alleged greenness of the brand. However, this was already standard practice for Polestar, which has been putting “sustainability labels" on its products for a few years. What’s different here is that some of the text is now emblazoned on the headrest and far more difficult for people entering the vehicle to miss. But, like so much corporate environmentalism, the whole thing seems rather hollow.


Details on the headrest labeling are pretty basic. Based on the promotional materials coming from the manufacturer, the text simply identifies which materials are being used (with an animal-welfare notice being added to any tags identifying genuine leather), followed by how much carbon per kilogram is produced, and then a label denoting that it’s been 100 percent traced – whatever that means to Polestar. 


While we’ve been told those labels will be subject to change, they don’t offer more than the most basic levels of information in their current format. Though the company said that it doesn’t even know the carbon footprint of any materials other than Nappa leather at present. Details about the other types of upholstery will be added once production commences, with Polestar promising to include the source of the materials used in the manufacturing process as well as what percentage is recycled or renewable. 


Honestly, it would be nice to see a manufacturer seriously commit itself to end-to-end traceability with an easy way for customers to track the production history of each individual component that goes into the car. Something like that would certainly solidify any brand’s commitment to transparency and eliminate any doubt consumers might have about companies being all talk and no walk. This would also help deflect accusations that the whole industry has been relying on forced labor for years. But feel-good labels are a lot easier to manage and don’t require a manufacturer to share information about its entire supply chain with the world. 


We’re not accusing the Volvo subsidiary of being less green than its rivals, just acknowledging that the term doesn’t typically mean much when it comes directly from the industry. Automakers have collectively been trying to cultivate a friendlier image for themselves since 2015. That’s when the dam broke and there was a deluge of corporate messaging about automakers shifting their focus toward promoting sustainability, equity, and environmentalism – with only the faintest hint of what those terms actually meant in terms of how the business would be managed. 


Our guess is that Polestar standardized virtue signaling will be a big hit with the kind of people that believe giving thousands of dollars to the right company will effectively nullify any environmental guilt they hold in their hearts. But that also feels like the manufacturer’s core audience, perhaps making the seat labels the perfect marketing tool.

[Images: Polestar]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.


Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 41 comments
  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Jan 03, 2023

    This is news from the land of Greta. How Polestar is different from Volvo? Why to buy Polestar instead of Subaru or Volvo?

    • See 3 previous
    • Sgeffe Sgeffe on Jan 04, 2023

      Or neither, since both are Chinese junk!


  • MK MK on Jan 04, 2023

    The label(s) looks incredibly tacky and really stick out, not in a good way. I wonder how much money was wasted on these trivial findings that are likely not even accurate, instead of making the actual product better.

  • MaintenanceCosts If you want a car in this category, you want interior space, comfort, predictability, and low running costs.That probably favors the RAV4 Hybrid, with second place going to the CR-V hybrid. The CR-V is a nicer-looking and nicer-feeling product, but it just has not proved quite as low-drama as the Toyota.The RAV4 Prime is a compelling car but it's extremely expensive and still hard to get, and the regular hybrids are a better value.There's no reason to choose the non-hybrid of either one. You get higher running costs and less refinement for no benefit.
  • Aaron Id lean towards the rav4. The crv1.5 turbo has had issues. The rav 4 has both port and direct injection, no cvt. Also the Toyota hybrid systems have been super stout
  • Jeff My wife owned a 2013 AWD CRV since new it has been trouble free but I am not a fan of turbos so I would lean toward the Rav 4. If I were getting a hybrid it definitely would be a Rav 4 with Toyota's hybrid system being the best. Honestly you could not go wrong with either a CRV or a Rav 4. My third choice would be a Mazda.
  • 3-On-The-Tree We like our 2021 Rav4 non hybrid.
  • Vatchy FSD never has been so what is with the hype about robo-taxis? You would need the first in order for the second to work.
Next