Abandoned History: The Life and Times of Edsel, a Ford Alternative by Ford (Part V)

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis
abandoned history the life and times of edsel a ford alternative by ford part v

Thus far in Abandoned History’s coverage of Edsel, we’ve learned about the brand’s introduction to the American consumer, and the immediate confusion its pricing caused. As far as product, thus far we’ve covered two of the four single-year Edsel models: Pacer and Citation. While those two models were sedans, there were also two Edsel wagons that bit the dust after one year. Meet the Roundup.


The Roundup was the cheapest wagon on sale at Edsel, though it shared the same 116-inch wheelbase as the other two Edsel wagons. Much of Ford’s full-size wagon product was closely related at the time, and in 1958 Ford’s lineup consisted of four different wagons that were largely differentiated via trim.


Two-door wagon offerings from Ford included the short-lived Del Rio, a replacement for the unsuccessful Parklane. The two-door sporty wagon was a relevant but declining segment at the time, and Ford struggled to compete against the likes of the Chevy Nomad and Pontiac Safari. Worth noting, that the Del Rio was also sold as Del Rio Ranch Wagon on some occasions. Separately, the Ranch Wagon was a longer-term nameplate at Ford and was available in two- and four-door versions. The Ranch Wagon was sold to the entry-level full-size wagon buyer and was the cheapest wagon at Ford.

A large six- or nine-passenger wagon held new appeal to the upscale family buyer in the Fifties: Customers desired them laden with chrome, wood paneling, and plenty of options. At Ford, wood paneling was reserved for the most expensive wagon, the Country Squire. For customers who couldn’t spring for the Di-Noc, there was the similar but more affordable Country Sedan. Upmarket domestic wagons of the era were always four doors, and neither the Country Sedan nor Country Squire was available with two.


Edsel’s Roundup was a massaged version of the Ranch Wagon, but unlike its Ford sibling was available only in two-door guise. Power was provided by one engine, a 361 cubic inch (5.9-liter) FE series V8. The engine was shared with the Ranger, Edsel’s base model sedan. New for ‘58, the 361 was considered an Edsel engine and was offered in five of seven Edsel models (Ranger, Pacer, Villager, Roundup, and Bermuda.)

The first FE series engine in any car, it was also added to 1958 Ford and Meteor cars in the Canadian market but was not used in any retail Fords in the United States. The engine was sold in the United States only for 1958 and only in Fords sold to law enforcement or emergency services fleet customers. In that use, it was sold as the Police Power Pack. 


In Roundup usage the engine had a 10:5:1 compression ratio, which meant 303 horsepower and 400 lb-ft of torque. With a four-barrel carb, the OHV engine was detuned slightly for more expensive Edsel models like the Corsair and Villager. The Roundup was available with either a three-speed manual or a new three-speed Cruise-O-Matic automatic. 


Because the Roundup was a basic model, the troublesome Teletouch transmission buttons in the steering wheel were an optional extra. In terms of size, the Edsel was slightly larger than its Ford counterpart because of its styling. While the Ranch Wagon was 203.5 inches long, the Edsel was 205.4”. Other dimensions were similar, though the Roundup was heavier than the Ranch Wagon as the Ford had a standard inline-six.

Like other Edsel models, the Roundup received front and rear clips in fine Edsel styling. And like other Edsels, the changes made to a Ford or Mercury to turn it into an Edsel often made it look worse. The Ranch Wagon of 1958 was a nice-looking design, with quad headlamps and a two-tier chromed mesh grille. The Roundup used the quad headlamps of the Ford but changed out the rest of the front end. 


A vertical Edsel horse collar grille displayed the company’s name in a vertical orientation, just like other Edsel models. Additional horizontal grilles flanked the central grille and wrapped around the front fender. Turn indicators were integrated into the horizontal grilles, which was really the only nice design touch at Edsel. The Ranch Wagon’s sensible chrome bumper was replaced by the Edsel two-piece design.


From a side view, there were only minimal alterations in the sheet metal in the transition from Ranch Wagon to Roundup. Pillars, roof, glass area, and sliding side windows were shared between both models. Paint schemes varied between the two wagons, as the Ford had a chrome trim strip from its front fender to just aft the door that was painted a secondary color, along with the hood. 

The Roundup had its secondary paint color on its roof and within the rear fender trim design. Unlike the other Edsels we’ve covered thus far, the Roundup did not receive a scallop design in its rear fender. The shape was replicated with trim, but the low price of the wagon did not warrant a change to the metal. Rear fins were identical between the Ford and Edsel. 


Like other ‘58 Fords, the Ranch Wagon had an unusual rear lamp arrangement of four ovoid shapes contained in two larger ovals. While the Ranch Wagon’s rear was less attractive than its front end, the Roundup’s rear quarters were even worse than its own front end. Unlike the Ranch Wagon, the tailgate of the Roundup was flat to make way for Edsel’s special tail lamp design.

And it was really something. V-shaped (or boomerang if you prefer) brake lamps were not similar to the Edsel sedans we’ve reviewed thus far. They stuck out on fins well past the tailgate, and the V pointed inward toward the middle. The tail lamps were set inside circular chrome dishes and were confusing to the eye. If a fellow motorist were behind a Roundup that indicated to the right, its brake lamp would blink and point to the left! Today it’s almost hard to believe the design passed through to production.


Inside, the Roundup received the special Edsel dash treatment with its drum-type speedometer but was limited in other special features given its entry-level status. To differentiate it from the Ranch Wagon, it had black rubber floors, standard ashtrays front and rear, armrests, an interior dome light package, and a headliner all in white vinyl. A split front seat was also a standard feature, so passengers could actually get in the back.

With its special looks and a V8 engine off-limits to Ranch Wagon customers, the Roundup asked $2,876 ($29,793 adj.) its one and only year. That was notably more expensive than the basic Ranger sedan, which started at $2,484 ($25,732 adj.). However, the Roundup was considerably more expensive than the Ranch Wagon, which asked just $2,504 ($25,939 adj.) that same year. For comparison, the much more luxurious Country Sedan was $2,771 ($28,705 adj.), still less expensive than the base Roundup. The wood-clad Country Squire asked $2,901 ($30,052 adj.) which made the Roundup’s pricing look even more ridiculous. 


As always, the proof was shown in the sales pudding. Just 924 of Edsel’s 63,110 sales in 1958 were Roundups. But even with that paltry sales figure, the Roundup sold better than the other one-year Edsel wagon - the Bermuda. But we’ll save that for Part VI.


[Images: Ford, seller, seller]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 14 comments
  • Jeff S Jeff S on Aug 27, 2022

    Jay Lenos Garage has a video on Martha's house and Edsel wagon.

  • Scoutdude Scoutdude on Aug 28, 2022

    I know the yellow car well. The builder and previous owner was good friends with a guy that lived 4 houses down from me. He also shopped at the same independent auto parts store that I did. He sold it to the person who listed it 5-6 years ago. I found that out when I found an ad for some Mustang wheels on Craigslist and went to pickup them up. Those pictures were definitely taken in his driveway. So either that ad has been up for years or he is stretching the truth about how long he has owned it.

  • Jkross22 "I’m doing more for the planet by continuing to drive my vehicle than buying a new one for strictly frivolous reasons."It's not possible to repeat this too much.
  • Jeff S Got to give credit to Chrysler for putting the 300 as a rear wheel drive back on the market. This will be a future classic.
  • Lou_BC How to Fix Auto Media? Stop fixating on soft touch plastics and infotainment systems. I did quite a bit of research on my ZR2. There was no mention of the complexity of putting the transfer case into neutral. (9 step process). They didn't talk about how the exhaust brake works with tow/haul mode. No mention that the exhaust brake does not work with off-road mode. Nannies only stay turned off with the lockers engaged. Only one review mentioned the tail pipe as a vulnerability.
  • EBFlex I think outlets should strive for quality over quantity. In-depth, thorough reporting that covers all aspects of a story. See what Phoebe Wall Howard has done at the Detroit Free Press. There is no stone unturned when she writes a story. Also, do the complete opposite of AutoBlog. Talk about trash
  • NotAnotherTeslaFanBoi Seems like Honda is taking the same approach they did with their first SUV’s- rebadge models from other makes to dip their toes in the market before going all-in.
Next